We are still looking for our first TRUE post-Trump racism outbreak story. They have all been fake. No arrests, only a couple police reports. It's all just nonsense. The same people who voted Trump voted Obama. The nation was not magically turned racist by the Trumpster Fire.
Turned racist no. Letting their racist flag fly? Hell yeah! Finally a candidate that get them and their dislike of Mexicans and A-rabs. He's going to build that wall and send them all back!
Let's face it while Trump is possibly not racist, and the majority of his followers are not likely racist. There however is a segment of racists and white nationalists he has energized.
People like this: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/viral-v...s-838716483925
The closest state that Trump won was by 10,000 votes. The national meeting of white supremacists in DC, the one they filmed them saying "hail trump", managed to get a mighty 250 to show up. White supremacists are a smaller group of people, than people with one hand.
Calling every white person a racist is why the Democrats are now just a regional party. People are tired of that game.
Judging every white person by the actions of a few fringe nut jobs has a name: McCarthyism.
Law Enforcement: "The Russian's directed the hack of information, that they ultimately used in an attempt to sway the election results toward Trump."
Trumpets: "I don't believe you. We don't care."
Law Enforcement: "Some black guy burned down a church in an attempt to sway the election results toward Hillary."
Trumpets: "OH MY GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD."
Eat yo vegetables
The simpleton logic of the left.
First, it is the supposedly the CIA's assessment that hackers backed by the Russian Government accessed files and then gave those files to wikileaks. The CIA has provided no proof of this other than their own speculations.
Second, the wikileaks showed that Hillary Clinton was trying to rig the election.
Third, the black guy who burned his own church down and wrote "Vote Trump" was caught and Law Enforcement has evidence that he did it.
No one ever said we don't believe the Russians hacked, people don't that Trump is tied to Russia.
You're one sad individual to bring that up instead of addressing how someone faked a fake hate crime by burning down their own church, this shows how brain washed you really are.
- - - Updated - - -
He doesn't care about truth he just wants to make Trump look bad. If Trump even did half of what Hillary had done they would have crucified him.
Hmm in most of those threads the questions I see most is what info did Russia release that swayed the election so much? not that no one cares, I'm curious myself, I've not seen any damming info that looks like it was released on her that could be blamed on the Russia for changing it just that that they did hack the DNC, it's possible I have not just ran across it yet, you have any good links to what that info was that changed everyone's mind about her and made them vote trump?
Last edited by Dadwen; 2016-12-22 at 02:31 PM.
He served 8 years for armed robbery, he's a felon. In Mississippi and many other states he can't vote.
https://www.aclu-ms.org/download_file/view_inline/19/1/
I'm sure he was just that obsessed with the elections though, right? He can't vote so burn down and church as a false flag. No way politics could have been a cover.
He got away with it for a month and a half. Go ahead and link the interview you claim he would have given in that time, I'll wait.
Last edited by -Nurot; 2016-12-22 at 02:51 PM.
There's plenty of publicly available evidence. But much of it will remain classified. As it should.
Yeah, no. They did no such thing.Second, the wikileaks showed that Hillary Clinton was trying to rig the election.
But have you seen the evidence for yourself? Have you verified the evidence? Or are you just taking the word of Law Enforcement officials that the evidence exists? Quite a pickle you've put yourself in....Third, the black guy who burned his own church down and wrote "Vote Trump" was caught and Law Enforcement has evidence that he did it.
Eat yo vegetables
Like I said, simpleton liberal logic.
The evidence is the burned church, that is physical evidence that a crime took place, you also have the words "Vote Trump" on the outside, you also have the suspect in custody.
So you have a crime that has been committed, you have the outcome of that crime and you have the person you believe responsible for that crime in custody pending trial. They are linked together.
The Russian conspiracy has no evidence other than rampant CIA speculation. They have no one in custody, and they have no evidence linking anyone to the leaks.
And yes, there is evidence of Hillary Clinton rigging the election. This is a pretty established fact, from colluding with the DNC, where Debbie Wasserman-Shultz was forced to resign, to the new interim DNC head giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton.
What evidence do you have access to, that links the suspect to the crime? Have you seen it with your own eyes? Or are you taking the word of law enforcement officers?
We have four separate, independent cyber security firms, that have all concluded that the Russians are responsible for the hacks.The Russian conspiracy has no evidence other than rampant CIA speculation.
You and I have vastly different opinions of what "rigging the election" means.And yes, there is evidence of Hillary Clinton rigging the election. This is a pretty established fact, from colluding with the DNC, where Debbie Wasserman-Shultz was forced to resign, to the new interim DNC head giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton.
Providing one or two questions for a debate is unethical. But that wasn't prompted by Hillary asking for the questions. And it certainly didn't do her any favors.
And the DNC is allowed to favor certain candidates. They're a private organization.
If Hillary was rigging the election, she did a piss poor job.
Eat yo vegetables
Absolutely no surprise here
The problem that the liberals are having isn't that someone (presumably the Russians) hacked the DNC servers. They are upset because the emails showing corruption were released at all. These are the same people that think that Edward Snowden is a hero and should be given a full pardon and maybe a medal. This is the hypocritical problem that they have; you can't advocate for full disclosure of questionable ethics in one case and cry foul in the other.
If the FBI catches the person who committed the hacking then prosecute them the same way you would anyone else for hacking a business network. But, stop crying about the information that was released. Nothing released was classified, it was all just proof of corruption and poor ethics within a political party.
"My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility
Prediction for the future
First, I wouldn't classify myself as Republican, and second I don't see Russia as a foe to me as an American. I am not sure where this new red scare, contemporary McCarthyism comes from.
Once again, no evidence exists other than rampant speculation regarding the Russian link to wikileaks.
- - - Updated - - -
Wonderful, please present this evidence.