that chip is on my shoulder cause you claimed in your first post "we had to save yer butts " and yes, that pisses me off. Had you claimed before that it was a combined effort with heavy emphasis on Russia i would not have.
Nice of you to dodge many of the points in there though but fine.
you really think Russia has a desire and plan to go the "third reich" way ??????
Sure, there's room for everyone. And you know what ? Before Crimea stuff, I even hoped Russia and NATO could merge in a new " Alliance ". But since Crimea stuff, and because USA and Russia still feel so much resentment since the cold war, I don't think it'll be for soon ...
You know what Haven ? We should depassionate the thing at a people scale, far from politics. We have to admit that yes, we may be wrong in some decisions, behaviors, and leaders have the balls to assume things when they are questionable in the eyes of the rest of the world, like with Syria, " Yes, he's using chemical warfare against his populations, but he's our ally and we support him anyway " instead of denying/contesting. And if they don't assume or disagree with things, they should simply deny to engage when it is so (like we did with the US WMD in 2nd Iraq war ... what a " social " price we paid for not engaging military with the USA ...). Like I said about the shot plane thing : if tomorrow you hear that yes, a russian missile shot it, will it change anything in the mind of those who always supported the fact it was a western lie ? I'm not sure.
Like for the nuke think, does one need to have 1000 nukes to definitively ruin another country, may it be in a nuclear ripost ? I don't think so. Nuclear warfare is not " if you have 10000 you're way more dangerous/stronger than if you have 100 ". European have enough nuclear stuff, may it be from land, submarines or bombers to be a rival threat for any other nation, even the USA.
Sorry to all the Russians :P
Just annoyed by the fact that the people that shot down MH17 will walk freely without any kind of trial.
Not much point in discussing anything further considering the europeans will back up europa, american people will back up america and russian people will back up russia.
We'll have to wait and see what the future brings.
Last edited by Mifuyne; 2016-12-22 at 09:52 AM.
What's the point of standing up to a mock tribunal? It was determined from the start that it was supposed to blame Russia. The very fact that the tribunal was supposed to take place before the investigation was finished should've raised suspicions...
Russia tried to enter NATO in 1954. The initiative was rejected in Europe without discussion. The reason is quite clear - the sole purpose of NATO at that time was to deter Russia. Not much has changed. Putin tried again in 2001, with the same result.
Thing is, by now the truth simply can not be established. Just like 9/11. Even if someone finds rock hard, absolute, undeniable proof, tons of it - it's going to be dismissed as "conspiracy theory" or "propaganda". Well, I suppose it means "welcome to the world of informational warfare". What can we do? Think critically and not let ourselves get consumed by hatred.You know what Haven ? We should depassionate the thing at a people scale, far from politics. We have to admit that yes, we may be wrong in some decisions, behaviors, and leaders have the balls to assume things when they are questionable in the eyes of the rest of the world, like with Syria, " Yes, he's using chemical warfare against his populations, but he's our ally and we support him anyway " instead of denying/contesting. And if they don't assume or disagree with things, they should simply deny to engage when it is so (like we did with the US WMD in 2nd Iraq war ... what a " social " price we paid for not engaging military with the USA ...). Like I said about the shot plane thing : if tomorrow you hear that yes, a russian missile shot it, will it change anything in the mind of those who always supported the fact it was a western lie ? I'm not sure.
Well that's a horrific miscarriage of justice, giving Crimea's treasures to Ukraine just because they were occupying the reason at the time they were loaned is just stupid.
I.E if Scotland loaned the Scottish crown jewels to the Netherlands and then left the UK would the send them to England? Of course not.
Obvious political stunt is obvious.
- - - Updated - - -
Not really, WW2 was already won before the USA finally joined in, the only question was how much of Europe was the USSR going to annex before the allies met them. As for WW1 most people don't know that the USA was even involved, it just replaced Russia for the final year.
Exactly, all these nations are great nations, proud nations (sometimes consumed by pride or moronic things like " I could beat you with my nuke "). Not more than 2 days ago, my wife was remembering me how we LOVED Moscow (and we'll be back ). What did we see in Moscow ? The same we have here. People going to work, kindly serving us great food (those potatoes fast-food yummies ), chatting, shopping with their families ... We all just want to live the best life we can (and can afford) for us and our families, everywhere in the world. It's the same. We must think about people first, even if what we see first is the consequences of politics (even when supported by people for the best and the worst).
I'm still hoping, truly, deeply, that we'll all calm down, be more reasonable, sincere and honest one with another, and leave room for all of us to live in peace with correct standards.
The 10 reasons Russian media (aka your government) gave for the killing of 300 people with flight MH17:
http://listverse.com/2015/09/07/10-o...crash-of-mh17/
Bellingcat analyses of the official Russian version of MH17 crash:
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-a...-were-exposed/
Why the Russian government can be called corrupt and thus can hardly be trusted:
https://www.transparency.org/country/#RUS
Preliminary results criminal investigation MH17:
https://www.om.nl/onderwerpen/mh17-v...ntation-joint/
Why the Dutch goverment can hardly be called corrupt:
https://www.transparency.org/country/#NLD
If you think we're powerless, you're making a grand mistake. Sure the populists in the US and in Europe are teaming up with Putin. Credit to him for luring them into his camp. But the rest of us, still a large majority in Europe and a small majority in the US, keep thinking. And analysing. And aren't as undereducated as the vast majority of the populists.
Another part of Europe, the former East-Block countries, experianced Russian influance first hand. Thats why they've democraticly chosen to be a part of the EU when they got the chanse. (and shot all the Russian tools that oppressed them for decades)
Ceausescu
The majority of the West did not forget, nor are we fools. The majority of the former Russian enclaves did not forget, nor are they fools either.
And military speaking: we are strong enough to counter any Russian attack on our soils.
A small tip: Start looking to Asia. (mabey you'll remember that i said that one day) Putin and Trump aren't teaming up for nothing, there is something to gain. China's infuance in Asia is a great concern to the USA and Russia. They're gonna try to stop China together and it will end in war.
As last: don't believe people like Putin will bring peace to the world. Look at how he took power and what he is doing to stay in power. Extend that line to the future and think.
Last edited by Adolecent; 2016-12-22 at 11:28 AM.
Depends on how you look at it really. Many EU countries are very weak and underfunded. The US of course is very capable of defeating the Russians in a possible WW3.
I personally don't worry about if "we" can win or not, but about the destruction on the European continent and the nuclear aftermath for the survivors.
Have you seen Russia? Half their submarines have either sunk in port or been scrapped due to under maintenance. We outnumber their air force by more than three to one not counting half their planes don't work. Granted they have a lot of tanks but the war in Libya showed that ground forces are worthless when the enemy has air superiority.
Invalid comparison. Scotland is internationaly accepted as a soverein country, Crimea isn't. Crimea is still seen as a part of Ukraine, occupied by Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...olution_68/262
The jewels were on loan to a museum in Amsterdam, not to the Dutch government. I know it's hard to understand for many people, specialy people who live in dictator-ruled-countries, but the Dutch government has nothing to say about that museum nor the independant courts... So blaming the Dutch government is just stupid populist crap. (go read a book!)
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-go-to-ukraine
You do realise that if the US should ditch Europe you know who will probably join into NATO or make a similar agreement with the EU countries?
Yes that would be Russia, and Europeans working with the Russians could mean all sorts of trouble for the US.
Prolly not gonna happen though.
Fine I will make it clearer, if Catalonia gained independance from Spain and some of it's treasures were on loan to a foreign museum, would they be expected to return them to the museum in Catalonia that owns them or to give the to Spain? Exactly.
This is nothing more than dirty politics, the west want to punish Crimea for choosing to leave Ukraine and so are doing this to hurt them.