Goddamn I'm soooooooooooooooo fucking tired of cons being so ridiculous and hypocritical about this stuff.
They call libs every name in the book, but when libs rightly point out that a vote for Trump is a pro vote for xenophobia, bigotry, the alt right, etc. they start crying about being called names. Especially when that is not the reason we lost.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
Solution based legislation?
See, this is what I'm talking about. You just assume privatization is bad, and somehow a rip off. But, if you were considering two jobs, you would take the one with the 401k over the pension. Because you know actually getting the money and investing it yourself is safer than relying on some charlatan to manage the account with success. Even if he isn't incompetent, it requires growth to actually work. Medicare is no different than Social Security in this way.
Why do Liberals just assume any change is bad, and any money not held by the government is bad?
Fair point. I think that was more detail than the conversation called for thus far, I was shooting for an accessible name. I don't think it weakens my point at all to compare him to FDR, when that is the most well known example in American politics of applied Keynesian theory and also happens to be wildly successful in practice.
I'm curious what's so 'piece of shit' about it. Not talking points, but actual experience with it.
Do you have any first hand experience with medicine? Are you a physician, therapist, hospital secretary, social worker, nurse, or anyone else with first hand knowledge of how hospitals and outpatient clinics work?
Much in the vein of your attitude toward "liberals," I'm genuinely interested in the real facts and ideas. Not dismissive rhetoric.
Something I need to understand
Why does mmo-champion hate liberals so much?
Why do they apply the term to such a wide demographic of people? Do they seriously think all liberals are the same?
Your tin foil is showing. You are literally claiming that Obamacare was fashioned to appease people who didn't cast a single vote for it. Even if that was Obama's plan, and I personally do not think he is that dumb, clearly it would have been a massive failure to both appease those who didn't vote for it, and to also not know he didn't need their votes. I'm pretty sure Obama can count to 60 just fine on his own.
I wouldn't agree that a no-fly zone inevitably leads to war with Russia. Something has/had to be done about Syria and a no-fly zone is at least a decent starting point to stop the double-tap bombing the Russians have been doing. The goal being to prevent the immediate loss of life.
Okay, seeing as everyone loves facts. I'll stick with Australia because we have 'free' healthcare.
Total healthcare cost 2015 $161 billion, which equates to roughly $7000 for every man, woman and child per year (that wonderchart is old btw). That is around 10% of GDP. Health costs are rising approx. 3% every year and will rise exponentially due to all the baby boomers getting old.
I was pretty healthy that year, I know I didn't use $7k worth of healthcare, but I had to shell the money out anyway. Isn't socialism just wonderful!