its hardly the majority, its half at best and even then thats stretching it and even then thats no where near 100% of the time, the only fight i was looking at was cenarius bcoz that is really the only fight where there is anything to pad since the other encounters stuff needs to die anyway hence not padding
you're absolutely correct but also absolutely wrong, what you dont get is that most other classes dont pad bcoz the things they dps has to die anyway, hence no padding, but when a destro lock starts padding on the dragons on cenarius, adds that dont need to die btw which you know as well as i do, then if a destro locks does well on that fight then it is 100% bcoz of them padding bcoz they are the only class that can actually pad on that fight unless ofc you're tanking the dragons on the boss.Like.. you're blaming padding as the reason why a Lock can do well but ignoring how much padding other classes do to appear to be destroying Locks in your eyes. Priority damage, Destruction locks are ridiculously good. The entire benefit of being a Destro Lock that when they DO cleave, they don't lose any damage from other priority targets so that makes up for their lack of single target when there isn't an add. Like.. Literally any.
i never said that, or atleast not the way you said, what i meant is that there was no way the person in question could consistantly get into top 3 unless the other players either suck or is undergeared, if you can get into top 3 on guarm hc or xavius otherwise then your raid sucks, and you know it.Again, a double standard. You're saying that other classes in your guild should be able to pull damage away from Destro on the add but the Destro locks can't pull damage away from the other classes. So if the Lock does well, he's either padding or his team sucks but if the other classes beat the Locks it's just because their classes are better? Get real.