Obama: I'm confident I could have won a third term as president

[JohnBrown1917]

That word has lost all meaning. Liberals used and abused it until most people don't give a shit anymore.

Most people? You mean the racists? I still have enough fate in western civilization to not think most of them are racist.

[Jotaux]

I'm confident he could have too with the current competition.

[Nihilanth]

Most people? You mean the racists? I still have enough fate in western civilization to not think most of them are racist.

Just because liberals call people racist, it doesn't mean they actually are. It means that the liberal in question has no valid arguments and seek the shame the person he/she is debating.

Well, it's not working for them. But they keep doing it.

Liberals are just retarded.

[JohnBrown1917]

Just because liberals call people racist, it doesn't mean they actually are. It means that the liberal in question has no valid arguments and seek the shame the person he/she is debating.

Well, it's not working for them. But they keep doing it.

Liberals are just retarded.

Just because somebody gets called a racist does not mean that person is not racist, its just racists trying to make it seem like racism has lost its meaning.
Its sad.

[Nihilanth]

Just because somebody gets called a racist does not mean that person is not racist, its just racists trying to make it seem like racism has lost its meaning.
Its sad.

Racist has a pretty clear connotation and definition.

The liberal definition of racist has been stretched to ridiculous proportions. For instance:

If you are anti-immigration.
If you are nationalistic.
If you are anti-multiculturalism.

They think that makes you are a racist.

[JohnBrown1917]

Racist has a pretty clear connotation and definition.

The liberal definition of racist has been stretched to ridiculous proportions. For instance:

If you are anti-immigration.
If you are nationalistic.
If you are anti-multiculturalism.

They think that makes you are a racist.

The reasons you support those things can still make you racist.

[LilSaihah]

The reasons you support those things can still make you racist.

You haven't actually responded to what's been said.

[JohnBrown1917]

You haven't actually responded to what's been said.

You mean the strawman of what liberals are?

- - - Updated - - -

You haven't actually responded to what's been said.

You mean the strawman of what liberals are?
I already addressed that racism still has a meaning.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

Just because liberals call people racist, it doesn't mean they actually are. It means that the liberal in question has no valid arguments and seek the shame the person he/she is debating.

Well, it's not working for them. But they keep doing it.

Liberals are just retarded.

Pot calling the Kettle Black.

[Kallisto]

Racist has a pretty clear connotation and definition.

The liberal definition of racist has been stretched to ridiculous proportions. For instance:

If you are anti-immigration.
If you are nationalistic.
If you are anti-multiculturalism.

They think that makes you are a racist.

Well first two is clearly a point of which somehow being from one area of the world makes you ultra superior to the others by virtue of saying those outside of if are not good enough to live here for what ever reason. So yeah that does make you racist.

Anti multi culturalism just makes you dumb since multiple cultures have lived together forever.

[Zomis]

He could win, we have a lot of uneducated voters, just a good thing most of them didn't bother voting in swing states.

[LilSaihah]

You mean the strawman of what liberals are?
I already addressed that racism still has a meaning.

If you think he's trolling or otherwise arguing disingenously don't respond to him.

In the meantime, respond to the arguments presented, not to the ones you've made up in your head.

[JohnBrown1917]

If you think he's trolling or otherwise arguing disingenously don't respond to him.

In the meantime, respond to the arguments presented, not to the ones you've made up in your head.

I don't think he is trolling, I responded to him.
What are you on about?

[ControlWarrior]

Trump barely beat Clinton, and lost the popular vote by almost 3 Million. He would have beaten him hands down, and anyone telling themselves otherwise has their head in the sand and like ignoring facts.

I can see how a Monday Morning Quarterback may come to this conclusion, but if you actually paid attention, you would know its impossible to say for sure. Clinton ran as a more moderate version of Obama, his "third-term" in fact. Obama campaigned hard for her and was rejected by many swing voters who wanted change. What did they want change from, if not from his administration? The people of America spoke, and while its a fun parlor game to speculate, no one can say for sure what would have happened

[Nihilanth]

The reasons you support those things can still make you racist.

And you could still support them, and not be racist. But that doesn't matter to liberals, you are still a racist nonetheless. Which is why normal people don't take them too seriously.

[FurryRedVixen]

Well.. there was that shoe that attacked Bush. >.>

[Nihilanth]

Trump barely beat Clinton, and lost the popular vote by almost 3 Million. He would have beaten him hands down, and anyone telling themselves otherwise has their head in the sand and like ignoring facts.

No one ran under the assumption that winning the popular vote meant winning the presidency. It's about time people stop using the popular vote as some sort of argument. It's a nothing more than a red herring.

[JohnBrown1917]

And you could still support them, and not be racist. But that doesn't matter to liberals, you are still a racist nonetheless. Which is why normal people don't take them too seriously.

No, that is just a strawman.

[Nihilanth]

No, that is just a strawman.

Don't you mean strawperson? You are sexist.

[Masark]

Well.. there was that shoe that attacked Bush. >.>