You completely misunderstood my post. When I stated "A husband is struggling to come to terms with this" I was stating this in conjunction with the wider situation. I thought this was quite clear, because how can you break the situation down into small component parts, and act as if they are somehow detached from everything else? No human thinks or behaves that way, surely?
He has the trauma of knowing that the woman he loves has been attacked, injured and abused. He may well feel shame or guilt that he was unable to prevent this. And now he has the issue that his wife wants to keep the resultant child. All of these things have to be considered when talking about the best outcome for what is a horrific situation.
At no point did I even suggest that this situation was nothing to do with the husband. I certainly never suggested anything like the notion that he is a "servant" in this setup, rather than an equal partner. I would suggest you read my post back, without the filter of your own fairly obvious prejudices (shown up in your last paragraph), and reconsider.
When challenging a Kzin, a simple scream of rage is sufficient. You scream and you leap.
Originally Posted by George CarlinOriginally Posted by Douglas Adams
This really depends on what you mean by "get a say". Legally, no, of course that's her decision. Ethics are a squishy subject.
From a practical, interpersonal standpoint though, saying that spouses have no say over what their partners do with their bodies is nonsense. Partners should very carefully consider their spouse's well being and preferences in addition to their own.
Honestly, not sure why I am bothering to reply to this thread except that maybe there's a 1% chance that its a real/true scenario and the husband in question is seeking opinions because he feels truly conflicted. That said...
As the woman, I would never carry the product of rape to term. I would get that object of hate and violence out of me at my earliest opportunity. The fact that the woman supposedly feels conflicted because of religious reasons beggars my credulity. I have zero respect for such a viewpoint especially if it would cause her husband distress. Given her supposed religious views I would think that whatever a man might want her to do should mean a lot. There's just something about the whole thing that feels really passive-aggressive about keeping a baby like that, esp against the wishes of the husband.
As the man I would ask my wife to terminate the pregnancy. If she refused on religious grounds I would seek divorce on the grounds of irreconcilable differences. I simply would 100% refuse to have anything to do with such a child or its upbringing. It's not that I blame the woman for being raped, far from it. Rape is a ghastly crime. But if she can't see reason on the issue then I'd have to wonder about her ability to compromise on every day issues too. The one compromise I might make is this: carry the child to term and place it up for adoption. As the husband I would despise that situation altogether, but if I truly loved the woman I might agree to it. This solution respects the (imo bullshit) concern about abortion as murder, but then the couple is free to truly move passed the rape by not raising the child themselves. If the wife refused even that compromise then she is welcome to carry on by herself. I'd dump her like a hot potato.
The situation is one of those impossible scenarios - there is no good solution that addresses all needs or concerns. Still, there's something about the woman's intransigence that makes me think she's a bit loony.
Here's an interesting bit:
Mothers may also face legal difficulties. In most US states, the rapist maintains parental rights. Research by legal scholar Shauna Prewitt indicates that the resulting continued contact with the rapist is damaging for women who keep the child. She wrote in 2012 that in the US, 31 states allow rapists to assert custody and visitation rights over children conceived through rape.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_from_rape
Oh and hey, know what? Fuck that...!
Is it OK for him to *want* her to get an abortion, absolutely.
Does she have any requirement to do it if she doesn't want to, absolutely not.
Is it ok for him to want her to do it? Yes, its okay for him to want to do anything. What matters is actions, not thoughts.
Is it morally acceptable? Well, see, when it comes to abortion there is no morally right choice. Thats where people get caught up - they try to find the morally right choice and there simply isn't one.
At the end of the day when it comes to abortion, you're debating the happiness of the mother vs the life of an unborn child. Personally i'd take the former, but again, because theres no right answer, i can see why the latter is also a potential choice.
In an ideal world, we would just say "fuck it" and let these retards deal with their own bad decisions (getting pregnant) like we do with people abusing drugs and such, but thats the thing - you can't. You can't when theres an innocent 3rd party - the child.
I would want my wife to get an abortion if she was raped, even though thats a really shitty thing to do right after a rape, but thats my feelings on it.
If i actually wanted kids , i may want her to keep it, but even then it would be a tough choice.
If i was the woman i'd get the abortion easily, no thought at all.
Life is not a dress rehearsal. Everyone has the right to seek happiness in their own way and not to have to feel responsible for the bad decisions of others. We have precious little true freedom and I see no problem with someone wanting to express that freedom however they may wish to do so.
The woman has options. The man has options. Choose wisely.
Guilt take the hindmost, to alter a cliche.
- - - Updated - - -
Agreed, but its is not the most obvious nor simplest meaning of those words. Plus look at the whole statement. The phrase "he doesn't want to raise a child not his own" suggests that what is being contemplated is in fact keeping the child to be raised as their own.
The thread was over in the first response - "no court anywhere will force the woman to get an abortion". I think, however, that he would have good cause to leave her. And hey, no child-care payments.
(although they should do a paternity test - how is the husband sure it's not his?)
Um, what? I quoted a single comment. There is no context in which what I said does not apply.
I fail see how what he said is a "lack of social development". Logic dictates that you don't stick your dick in crazy and if the crazy surfaces after the fact, get the fuck out.
Maybe I'm misreading what you're saying here but it seems a bit out of context. First, leaving her is not "punishing her". It's protecting himself. That it comes at the expense of her "feels" is irrelevant. Secondly, the so-called "punishment" would be for keeping the baby, not being raped.
That's the problem with imaginary friends - They're never around when you need them.
Just because it happens doesn't mean it's legal in those countries. In fact, a quick google brought up islamqa.info/en/40269 which talks about this very point, having said that abortion in Islam is allowed if it's due to rape (provided it is done as early as possible).
Blanket statements are never right.
This is so good it needs to be a sig and on a bumper sticker. Should be freshman orientation, too.Logic dictates that you don't stick your dick in crazy and if the crazy surfaces after the fact, get the fuck out.
(not being sarcastic here, just to be clear)
Could not agree more - if she really wanted to get rid of the baby and still keep religion, there are passages and phrases she could use. I would bet (with zero evidence) that she just really wants a baby and they haven't had one yet - but again, total speculation.Maybe I'm misreading what you're saying here but it seems a bit out of context. First, leaving her is not "punishing her". It's protecting himself. That it comes at the expense of her "feels" is irrelevant. Secondly, the so-called "punishment" would be for keeping the baby, not being raped.
Not bumper sticker worthy, but definitely a good chuckle.That's the problem with imaginary friends - They're never around when you need them.