...............Actually, it isn't.
so you now agree that Bliz has (recently) made easy to play highly mobile specs strong in raids and might well in the future?
Create whatever strawman you like.
No strawman. You said that anyone, which directly included Roger because he posted before you said this, suggesting BM could be useful in NH, was lying.
Literally the entire argument is based on hedging the bets that the movement of Nighthold is so punitive to MM that BM can overcome its extreme numerical shortcomings. There has not been evidence presented to this effect.
Yes, that is the argument. And neither side of the discussion has presented meaningful quantitative evidence. I dont know why you think that makes one side liars ?
So Mythic raid representation is not a good indication of how effective a current class design is?
LOL - no it is certaintly not. Do you really think either raid representation or even raid effectiveness is an excellent measure to use of good class design? In fact that (high representation and/or high effectiveness) can just as easily be the result of bad broken design. . . . . . consider just for example a class design that had one (and only one) spell, which instant killed the boss, and then (after boss dead) instant killed the whole raid.That would be bad design, but would be rather 'effective' and you would pretty quickly see high representation in mythic progression.