Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ...
6
7
8
9
10
... LastLast
  1. #141
    The Undying Cthulhu 2020's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rigging your election
    Posts
    36,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Deathcries View Post
    It's expected. The butt hurt is glorious.

    - - - Updated - - -



    I think you're thinking of Hillary. As Putin said, she was trying to start WW3. Thank God we avoided that catastrophe. Be glad all you're going to be for the next 8 years is butt hurt, and still alive.
    Will believe Putin about Hillary starting ww3, remains defiantly antagonistic towards US government findings.

    If you're going to be a fountain of bullshit, at least be consistent. Or don't. I'm sure we're not going to be too torn up if you continue to make it easy to laugh at you.

    That the Trumpkins are coming into a thread about Trump admitting the Russians were behind the attacks and talking about anything but that is pretty telling of how they're still trying to figure out how to twist this without admitting they were wrong.
    2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
    2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"

  2. #142
    I give zero fucks clinton lost. Fuck her. She should be put in prison so she can never even look at a computer ever again. She is a stain on american politics.
    Last edited by Barnabas; 2017-01-08 at 10:50 PM.

  3. #143
    Quote Originally Posted by Zan15 View Post
    Of course they blamed the democrats, on the same level as blaming a women for dressing to sexy and a skirt that made it too easy to rape her.
    This isn't equivalent to blaming a rape victim because of their clothing. This is more like leaving some cash on the street with a sign that says it is illegal to take it while actually expecting nobody will take it. Expecting a woman to give up their personal freedom to choose their clothing and expecting that an organization meets reasonable standards to protect sensitive information are not even close to the same thing. Blaming someone for utter incompetence is fine. Blaming someone for exercising basic freedoms such as picking clothes is not.
    Last edited by Sesshou; 2017-01-08 at 11:03 PM.

  4. #144
    Quote Originally Posted by Deathcries View Post
    It's expected. The butt hurt is glorious.
    - - - Updated - - -
    I think you're thinking of Hillary. As Putin said, she was trying to start WW3. Thank God we avoided that catastrophe. Be glad all you're going to be for the next 8 years is butt hurt, and still alive.
    If someone breaks into your home to rob you, what do you, as a gun loving conservative do to protect yourself? Shoot them in the face, right?
    Why then are we OK with a foreign entity- not just Russia- stealing information and trillions of dollars from the US? Your answer is to ignore it and it will go away and we will be safe.
    We are less secure than we were during the cold war and we will all be "butt hurt" because you can expect financial institutions and businesses to continue to be raped by cyber attacks in the future. Americans have been attacked and this is so much bigger than Trump or Hillary.
    We need to stop buying fighters and start employing the most brilliant computer and network engineers to combat this threat. Bruce Boxleitner and Jeff Bridges are looking for work.

  5. #145
    Not really related to the topic but I just picked the first Trump-thread I stumbled upon. A nice thing about Trump is that next time the Americans want to "drain the swamp" it will be really easy, because Trump's cabinet including Trump himself are so old. I mean some of the most influential posts are held by people in their late 60's through 70's. Won't be many Donald Rumsfeld's there who started in the Nixon administration and continued having considerable influence up until George W Bush.

    Anyway Trump is an idiot. Hope there's enough sane and able people around him to moderate him. Glad that even an idiot can, at last through much to great avail, see reason. And for those of us who are ever-optimistic we can always hope that Trump gambled on some sort of madman theory thing, speaking of Nixon, and that in fact he will turn on Putin and somehow end up being hurtful for his reign and accelerate the inevitable decline of this Russian authoritarian regime.

  6. #146
    I realize some people see this as a good thing. But I would like to point out that better international relations with Russia isn't necessarily a bad thing. And regardless of what Trump believed, that is what he was headed towards. Using Russia as a scapegoat for Trumps election is a dangerous proposition. I wonder who benefits most from this and how it could be used to manipulate the public into accepting unwarranted actions against Russia or other countries.

    This shifts the conversation away from domestic problems. I'm not sure if the Trump team has realized how well this could play to their advantage. Or maybe this is them realizing that just now. The last thing we need is a war with Russia, or some Russian sponsored state, as a means to distract the public from domestic problems. This all seems similar to Bush/Iraq in 2001.

  7. #147
    Quote Originally Posted by Zmaniac17 View Post
    I realize some people see this as a good thing. But I would like to point out that better international relations with Russia isn't necessarily a bad thing. And regardless of what Trump believed, that is what he was headed towards. Using Russia as a scapegoat for Trumps election is a dangerous proposition. I wonder who benefits most from this and how it could be used to manipulate the public into accepting unwarranted actions against Russia or other countries.

    This shifts the conversation away from domestic problems. I'm not sure if the Trump team has realized how well this could play to their advantage. Or maybe this is them realizing that just now. The last thing we need is a war with Russia, or some Russian sponsored state, as a means to distract the public from domestic problems. This all seems similar to Bush/Iraq in 2001.
    I'm sure a lot of people though "the last thing we need is war with Germany" when they started invading neighboring countries by way of arguments that they were to protect ethnic Germans in the 1930's. In the end we cannot and should not cave to authoritarian regimes. Putin's actions is unacceptable and he bears the responsibility of these bad relations. We cannot have him annex parts of other countries without consequences. Then it will only get worse. It is already getting worse, since nobody cared when he went into Georgia. Then he went into Ukraine. What's next, Estonia?

  8. #148
    The Lightbringer Ahovv's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,015
    Quote Originally Posted by The Batman View Post
    Will believe Putin about Hillary starting ww3, remains defiantly antagonistic towards US government findings.

    If you're going to be a fountain of bullshit, at least be consistent. Or don't. I'm sure we're not going to be too torn up if you continue to make it easy to laugh at you.

    That the Trumpkins are coming into a thread about Trump admitting the Russians were behind the attacks and talking about anything but that is pretty telling of how they're still trying to figure out how to twist this without admitting they were wrong.
    You're right, it's hard to believe she would have started WW3. That's a pretty bold claim.

    However, she repeatedly stated her intent to topple Assad, which would have inevitably led us to further funding/aiding radical Muslims. Morons like John McCain already support this, and a Clinton presidency would have expanded this policy.

  9. #149
    Cannot wait for him to tweet that him not believing in Russian hackings was a propaganda move by the "dishonest" media.

    Oh, nevermind, he already implied that in a tweet 4hrs ago.
    Last edited by HumbleDuck; 2017-01-08 at 11:22 PM. Reason: Update

  10. #150
    Quote Originally Posted by Zarc View Post
    I'm sure a lot of people though "the last thing we need is war with Germany" when they started invading neighboring countries by way of arguments that they were to protect ethnic Germans in the 1930's. In the end we cannot and should not cave to authoritarian regimes. Putin's actions is unacceptable and he bears the responsibility of these bad relations. We cannot have him annex parts of other countries without consequences. Then it will only get worse. It is already getting worse, since nobody cared when he went into Georgia. Then he went into Ukraine. What's next, Estonia?
    Ok, well the same holds true for the United States. Many people around the world feel the same way about U.S. invasions of foreign countries as well. I agree with you that there is some point where military action is the only choice, but that has to be the last card on the table not the first or even the second. And it certainly should not be used as a distraction tactic by politicians attempting to hold onto power.
    Last edited by Zmaniac17; 2017-01-08 at 11:32 PM.

  11. #151
    Quote Originally Posted by Zmaniac17 View Post
    I realize some people see this as a good thing. But I would like to point out that better international relations with Russia isn't necessarily a bad thing. And regardless of what Trump believed, that is what he was headed towards. Using Russia as a scapegoat for Trumps election is a dangerous proposition. I wonder who benefits most from this and how it could be used to manipulate the public into accepting unwarranted actions against Russia or other countries. This shifts the conversation away from domestic problems.
    Your first two sentences say the same thing, and I agree that having positive relationships with countries that we don't have the warmest relationships with is almost certainly a positive thing. I can't believe I am going to quote scripture, but the love your enemy injunction appears in Luke and Mathew. Trump would do well to "love" Putin's Russia but lets also add Bashar al-Assad and North Korea. What's the harm in having warmer relationship with them? Iran? How about the Palestinians?
    Here is another spiritual quote: "Happy New Year to all, including to my many enemies and those who have fought me and lost so badly they just don't know what to do. Love" Donald Trump.
    Before we have warmer relationships with foreign countries, I hope that he can embrace his domestic "enemies" and try to have a warmer relationship with them.

  12. #152
    The Unstoppable Force Super Kami Dende's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    The Lookout
    Posts
    20,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    People still think Trump isn't a misogynistic asshat.
    People still believe all the lies Trump tells, no matter how much evidence is against him.
    People care more about winning, than being logically consistent.

    This is fun.
    Keep up that victim narrative bruh.

  13. #153
    Quote Originally Posted by Hubcap View Post
    They also flooded the EU with refugees with the help of their buddy Assad, caused the Brexit, it passed by just a few percentage points, and they might get rid of their enemy Merkel.
    Russia is trying, and is partly succeeding in destabilising The West. The big question is: Why is Trump helping Russia?

  14. #154
    I find it amazing that you are more upset about russia exposing the crimes rather than the fact that the crimes where comitted. Surely they did your country a favor? You were about to vote in a perosn who had hidden criminal acts as your fucking PRESIDENT!

  15. #155
    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel SnackyCakes View Post
    Keep up that victim narrative bruh.
    I'm not sure how that's a victim narrative. I was merely demonstrating the willful ignorance of Trump supporters. It's not as if I wanted Hillary to win, I cannot stand the woman.

  16. #156
    Quote Originally Posted by Aphrel View Post
    I find it amazing that you are more upset about russia exposing the crimes rather than the fact that the crimes where comitted. Surely they did your country a favor? You were about to vote in a perosn who had hidden criminal acts as your fucking PRESIDENT!
    What crimes? Will she be prosecuted? I hope so anyway. Imagine the backlash. Democrats would finally get up and vote for a change and maybe even organize.
    We should be much more concerned with the hack than what they found if you have any respect at all for the Fourth Amendment and the future of cyber security in the US. Attacks will continue but it wil be felt by republicans, buisnesses and the common Joe.
    In fact, just as I am writing this, just saw on Fox a minute ago that Wikileaks is putting up identities of individuals with Pornhub search histories from web browsers! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfr64zoBTAQ
    It's that kind of stuff that is going to really do a number on our society. Can't erase that horse porn search from 2012 from the servers, bub. Though break.

  17. #157
    Quote Originally Posted by alexw View Post
    No. I'm not a Trump supporter. He hasn't convinced me of anything. I saw through his lies immediately.

    I mean come on, really, how can any intelligent person believe those lies of his when his ability to lie is like that of a 5 year old?
    Right, you ironic donkey. Again, why are you trusting intelligence "agencies" companies like NSA with no evidence? Would you trust McDonalds if they said a ton of trans-fat was good for you? I mean, they might have classified documents with some declassified papers there.

    A statement is not enough evidence.
    Last edited by Fojos; 2017-01-09 at 01:04 AM.

  18. #158
    Quote Originally Posted by Fojos View Post
    Right, you ironic donkey. Again, why are you trusting intelligence "agencies" companies like NSA with no evidence? Would you trust McDonalds if they said a ton of trans-fat was good for you? I mean, they might have classified documents with some declassified papers there.

    A statement is not enough evidence.
    Are you being serious?

    You do realize classified information means its not supposed to be released to the public? And that the techniques they use to gather information and the information itself are, well, classified?

    By your arguments noone anywhere would ever trust any intelligence agency. We might as just get rid of the whole lot and operate blind, that's how stupid what you are saying is.
    Quote Originally Posted by Redtower View Post
    I don't think I ever hide the fact I was a national socialist. The fact I am a German one is what technically makes me a nazi
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    You haven't seen nothing yet, we trumpsters will definitely be getting some cool uniforms soon I hope.

  19. #159
    Quote Originally Posted by Fojos View Post
    Right, you ironic donkey. Again, why are you trusting intelligence "agencies" companies like NSA with no evidence? Would you trust McDonalds if they said a ton of trans-fat was good for you? I mean, they might have classified documents with some declassified papers there.

    A statement is not enough evidence.
    And in a recent news post, nothing will be done about the hacking because 'The democrats invited the hacking'. He literally just did a 'Well she was wearing a short skirt, can't blame a guy' in politics.

  20. #160
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,922
    Quote Originally Posted by Dumbleduck View Post
    Cannot wait for him to tweet that him not believing in Russian hackings was a propaganda move by the "dishonest" media.

    Oh, nevermind, he already implied that in a tweet 4hrs ago.
    Womp wwoommppp

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •