Originally Posted by
BananaHandsB
The amount of argumentative fallacies in this post seem to indicate it was written by a child, but hey that's ad hominem so let's take a look. It's funny because there might be some good points to be made in this argument, the OP just made an incredibly elaborate post that seemed to ignore them and stick almost purely to the fallacies. The post ends up being a 'I DONT LIKE ARENA AND THIS IS WHY' rant, rather than "this is why I think arena needs to be removed from the game".
Begging the question and circular reasoning.
Misquote. They said competitive esports in wow was the problem; arena was just the avenue they took. Never said anything was wrong about arena in wow without the competitive esport aspect.
Faulty generalization. It's incredibly different than the MOBAs you listed.
Ad consequentiam. Not to mention 0 explanation of what is really meant by this. Appeal to vagueness? (making that one up)
Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Also ad consequentiam.
Ad antiquitatem and Genetic Fallacy. Ignores the argument of "why this needs to be removed" and instead just laments the "good old days".
Many in this one but anecdotal fallacy, (a ton of) ad populum, hasty generalization, appeal to spite, false authority, and riddled with little more than personal opinions of arena.
Faulty generalization and strawman.
Ad consequentiam, Texas sharpshooter fallacy, but largely ad populum.
Practically every fallacy in the book made it's way in this post. See #6. Again purely argues why he/she doesn't enjoy arena, but not why it needs to be removed.
Appeal to accomplishment, false analogy, false equivalence.
...and many more. It's been awhile since English 110.