If you push a button that finds you a 'random group' and it gives you a random group of people with random skill and random knowledge then you have no right to complain that a 'random group' button did what it was designed to do. The fault lies in your inability to make friends to play with instead of relying on a button designed to be random. It is a 'random group' button, not a 'best of the best' button.
Maybe they have a tape of him admitting to sexual assault and mocking American POWs and Gold Star Mothers. Man, if conservatives ever found out that Trump did stuff like that....
Trump is so brilliant. Using this Russia news to distract from Sessions to distract from Meryl Streep distracting us from Jared Kushner
Democrats are the best! I will never ever question a Democrat again. I LOVE the Democrats!
The thing to think about is, now that all the major intelligence agencies are looking into it what will they find? And what will they do with the information if they find something incredibly damning.
Big parts of the FBI are full on Trumpist but the other agencies aren't, and many in the NSA and CIA hate him due to his Putin lovefest. Its pretty obvious in the way they leaked this story to CNN. So even the agencies themselves sit on damning information about Trump its highly likely it'll be leaked anyway.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=5Tr630q_DH4
That's the video of Evan McMillan before the election clearly calling out the Trump Russia connection and CNN had to treat it like it was radioactive because it was an unconfirmed story.
If you push a button that finds you a 'random group' and it gives you a random group of people with random skill and random knowledge then you have no right to complain that a 'random group' button did what it was designed to do. The fault lies in your inability to make friends to play with instead of relying on a button designed to be random. It is a 'random group' button, not a 'best of the best' button.
Be more concerned with media, once a reporter gets a juicy bone they gnaw at it until they crack that sucker open to get the marrow inside. Govt agencies are prone to hiding details to 'conserve the democratic way of life' but reporters entire existence revolves around being the first to break the story publicly.
If you push a button that finds you a 'random group' and it gives you a random group of people with random skill and random knowledge then you have no right to complain that a 'random group' button did what it was designed to do. The fault lies in your inability to make friends to play with instead of relying on a button designed to be random. It is a 'random group' button, not a 'best of the best' button.
LOL this i great watching the left contort themselves over every headline about Trump. And we have another 8 years of this to look forward to.
"One reason the nation's intelligence chiefs took the extraordinary step of including the synopsis in the briefing documents was to make the President-elect aware that such allegations involving him are circulating among intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress and other government officials in Washington, multiple sources tell CNN".
Key point is bolded. Does anyone seriously think that if there was anything out there about Trump that we wouldn't have heard about it before the election? Clinton had a whole army of sycophants dedicated to dig up dirt on Trump, is anyone suggesting they couldn't find this? But a bunch of B Grade Russian hackers could?
I think that this, in itself, is enough to take this with a grain of salt.CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats. At this point, CNN is not reporting on details of the memos, as it has not independently corroborated the specific allegations. But, in preparing this story, CNN has spoken to multiple high ranking intelligence, administration, congressional and law enforcement officials, as well as foreign officials and others in the private sector with direct knowledge of the memos.
Don't get me wrong, again, the more transparency, the better.
I just feel that this is a smearing campaing by the anti-Trump circle (note how I didn't say democrats here).
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
... You.. you do realize there are members of the Right looking into this too right? And don't pretend ones like you aren't just sticking your fingers in your ears and blaming the left for everything that may make your glorious leader look bad. He's a human being, he makes mistakes too.
I'm not sure that everything out there could be found. And Trump was never vetted the way other presidential candidate are - no one took him seriously until he got the nomination and no one thought he would win until he did.
If they are circulating the intelligence agencies that is much different than just floating around DNC headquarters.
If you push a button that finds you a 'random group' and it gives you a random group of people with random skill and random knowledge then you have no right to complain that a 'random group' button did what it was designed to do. The fault lies in your inability to make friends to play with instead of relying on a button designed to be random. It is a 'random group' button, not a 'best of the best' button.
@Yvaelle already covered this in detail, but I want to emphasize a thing he didn't state outright: at no point was that picture claimed to be evidence. Sometimes a background picture is a background picture (and as to why, read said post by Yvaelle).
Out of curiosity, was this person already a billionaire before the fall of communism?
The American public has tons of compromising information on Trump, but millions of them just don't care. Seriously, what could actually come out, that would stop his legion of zealots from supporting him?
The guy hid his taxes, which showed he didn't pay any, his supporters cheered him for it.
The guy personally admitted to sexual assault on tape, his supporters didn't hardly flinch.
More than a dozen women come forward to corroborate what Trump actually said, his supporters threatened to kill those women.
Trump said sexist and misogynistic things about many women, people cheered him on.
Trump bankrupted businesses and screwed over thousands of people, his supporters call him a great businessman.
Trump made fun of a handicapped man, his supporters loved it.
Trump called for his supporters to turn violent, they obliged.
Trump race baited like a motherfucker, his supporters just said that he was speaking for them.
It does not matter what information you find, his supporters won't care. His popularity is based on willful ignorance... so no amount of evidence or facts will sway people like that.
I am open to it. Again, the more transparency, the better.
I doubt this would have any impact on Trump. As he'll be president of the United States in ten days, that will make him immune to these allegations. I certainly want it exposed, though, if that is true. We need people who watch and call out the people up there, they shouldn't have the leisure of standing immune in their ivory tower.
However, due to the timing and which camp push this narrative, I have a hard time grasping what exactly could be true and what is artificially inflated.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..