Intel: Russia has Compromising info on Trump.

[LaserSharkDFB]

Yeh, and? Thats a fact, what they presented was make believe. Its news, its supposed to be factual.

Are you being serious right now? It's a graphic. It's not like they had a video of the actual hacking going on. It's just 'we're talking about hacking so look at this thing that reminds you of hacking for three seconds.' You're really reaching here.

[alexw]

Nothing like the Democratic Hypocrisy Machine to amp their deflection tactics 1000-fold.

What has the the democratic party got to do with the CIA/FBI/NSA alleging that Trump has been compromised by Russia?

- - - Updated - - -

Seems like left winged conspiracy here in other words fake news by the MSM if thye try to tkae Trump down prepare for a civil war

Drink everybody!!!

[Torto]

Yup. It's this -

Bwahahahahahaaha.....MOJO!!! Could you not find a more left wing 'independent' news organisation?

And you guys rubbish us when quoting Breitbart

[Kaleredar]

Nothing like the Democratic Hypocrisy Machine to amp their deflection tactics 1000-fold.

Why are democrats in any way relevant in this discussion?

Trump is going to be president. Both houses are controlled by republicans.


You can't blame any of this on democrats. Everything that comes down the pipes is going to be on republican heads. Democrats don't have to "deflect" for anything.


Trump, on the other hand, looks like he may have some explaining to do. And unlike in the election, he and his supporters can't just shout "butbutbut Shillary!" anymore.

[Deleted]

Seems like left winged conspiracy here in other words fake news by the MSM if thye try to tkae Trump down prepare for a civil war

It's actually about understanding that Russia has you guys (Dems, Repubs and Trump) by the balls, but feel free of being happy that "your side" won.

[Sky High]

Seems like left winged conspiracy here in other words fake news by the MSM if thye try to tkae Trump down prepare for a civil war

there's another one, keep this up I don't have a buzz on yet.

[alexw]

Bwahahahahahaaha.....MOJO!!! Could you not find a more left wing 'independent' news organisation?

And you guys rubbish us when quoting Breitbart

And its been corroborated by CNN and political leaders of both parties.

[WernerCD]

Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.



Maybe the Chickens have come home to roost.

A foreign government could use this information to help persuade or influence a government official on policies.

Wikileaks is on record as saying they have stuff on Trump as well... but it's no worse than what he puts out on a daily basis.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/w...-donald-trump/

"“We do have some information about the Republican campaign,” Assange said. “I mean, it’s from a point of view of an investigative journalist organization like WikiLeaks, the problem with the Trump campaign is it’s actually hard for us to publish much more controversial material than what comes out of Donald Trump’s mouth every second day, I mean, that’s a very strange reality for most of the media to be in.”

Trump has issues... but he shit was front and center - and the reality is better than the ZOMGITSTHEENDOFTHEWORLDWTFBBQ!!:!@# that the left puts out there...

On the other hand, the ZOMG SHES AS PURE AS THE FIRST WINTER SNOW!!! the left puts out there is just as equally bs.

[Yvaelle]

I know I am, but we, the people, need to demand MORE from them. They fucking owe it to us.

Now on the face, the using of a F4 screen to show hacking is not some OMG thing, but it just shows the laziness or carelessness on their part. Would a screen of a guy writing a script for a hack have been that hard to get? Doubtful, go down to IT tell Jim to look like he is hacking something, snap a pic. And it would have presented their viewers with accurate information, the end goal (ideally) of a news organization.

See, I feel like if you went down to Jim in IT and asked him to look like he was hacking something - he'd turn off the room lights, put on his life jacket and sunglasses, and stare intently into a Windows '95 scrolling marquee screensaver of the phrase 'L33t H4x0r1ng' (because he buys into the fantasy/allegory of hacking), whereas if you wanted a real photo - you would sneak up behind Janice in Accounting take a picture of a rather plain-looking middle-aged woman staring a little too intently at a massive Excel sheet.

The problem with that, is that it's unrecognizably boring and normal looking work - versus the portrayal that people are used to, even if it's not accurate - which is Matrix code flying down the screen and cyberpunk dudes in black trenchcoats decking their way into virtual realities.

I care a lot more about the quality of their writing and reporting, and basically nothing at all about the quality of their photos. I don't see any harm in their photo of hacking not being a realistic portrayal of hackers/hacking - particularly in an article which is not an expose on the life of modern hackers.

[Belize]

Seems like left winged conspiracy here in other words fake news by the MSM if thye try to tkae Trump down prepare for a civil war

Yeah, all those Trumpeteer internet keyboard warriors will really put up a fight in the civil war.

I mean, you guys might send mean Tweets, watch out.

[jackofwind]

I know I am, but we, the people, need to demand MORE from them. They fucking owe it to us.

Now on the face, the using of a F4 screen to show hacking is not some OMG thing, but it just shows the laziness or carelessness on their part. Would a screen of a guy writing a script for a hack have been that hard to get? Doubtful, go down to IT tell Jim to look like he is hacking something, snap a pic. And it would have presented their viewers with accurate information, the end goal (ideally) of a news organization.

I mean I understand what you're saying, but they do it with sports team logos, names, and stuff like that all the time as well. None of it is very meaningful, they're just mistakes.

I'm not saying they shouldn't try to do a way better job than they're doing, but I think that there's a lot of sensationalising of their sensationalism of the news going on these days. (If that makes sense).

- - - Updated - - -

Wikileaks is on record as saying they have stuff on Trump as well... but it's no worse than what he puts out on a daily basis.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/w...-donald-trump/



Trump has issues... but he shit was front and center - and the reality is better than the ZOMGITSTHEENDOFTHEWORLDWTFBBQ!!:!@# that the left puts out there...

On the other hand, the ZOMG SHES AS PURE AS THE FIRST WINTER SNOW!!! the left puts out there is just as equally bs.

Everyone is shit, #nolivesmatter, #fuckthheanthroparchy

[Brubear]

The intelligence agencies had no issue investigating Hillary over the emails scandals, and that was during the heat of the election campaign, remember? Are you suggesting that they wouldn't investigate Trump if they had even a hint of illegal activities?

So we have the intelligence agencies saying that 1) Russia was trying to influence the election 2) That they are sitting on incriminating information about Trump.

Someone asks why it wouldn't have come out before the election.

Please, enlighten me. WHAT other reason would there be for that incriminating evidence to have not come out before the election?

Either all of the agencies are wrong (we're talking ALL of them, along with a large number of sitting members of Congress) and this is just a disinformation campaign to undermine Trump, or their reports are true.

Tell me, which one of those sounds like more of a conspiracy theory?

[Shadowmelded]

What's even happening anymore.

[DeadmanWalking]

Is he trusted in the same way that Wikileaks was a trusted source of official leaks, until they had information against a Democrat? Excuse me while my Believe-Your-Bullshit meter continues to peg at 0.

Are you trying to assume that I thought WikiLeaks was ever a source of official news? You need to know who you are talking to before you go off making assumptions and leaping off cliffs.

[Aeluron Lightsong]

I'm glad we reached the point where we can just call "lol fake" on every news source now. next meme of 2017 guyz.

"But it's CNN Bruh."

[Kiri]

Wikileaks is on record as saying they have stuff on Trump as well... but it's no worse than what he puts out on a daily basis.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/w...-donald-trump/



Trump has issues... but he shit was front and center - and the reality is better than the ZOMGITSTHEENDOFTHEWORLDWTFBBQ!!:!@# that the left puts out there...

On the other hand, the ZOMG SHES AS PURE AS THE FIRST WINTER SNOW!!! the left puts out there is just as equally bs.

Wikileaks does not equal Russia though, not sure where you got that. If Russia is holding back something they potentially have on Trump, they would not give it to Wikileaks to review...

Regarding the Hillary deflection, why is everyone not on 'the left' so obsessed with her? I do not see anyone here calling her super pure or anything outside of people who do so 'ironically'.

[Belize]

What's even happening anymore.

Kinky. In a weird way.

[Wolfheart9]

What's even happening anymore.

.. Wat

While that's a drop in the bucket for news and won't do a thing to him, it does kinda further the point that he's an overgrown man-child.

[Deleted]

Bwahahahahahaaha.....MOJO!!! Could you not find a more left wing 'independent' news organisation?

And you guys rubbish us when quoting Breitbart

CNN is still right half the time, Breibart, however, has never been right about a thing, and makes up a lot of stuff as they go.

Partially correct CNN > Imaginary Breibart.

[alexw]

Buzzfeed just released all the source documents the British spy provided to the FBI. You can read them here.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinge...Ew7#.uo5NvVqrz