You're dreaming. First of all Democrats have consolidated into the party that is for small government on social issues while being in favor of big government on economic issues, while the Republicans have consolidated into the party in favor of big government on social issues and small government on economic issues. And Donald Trump is very much big government on social issues. If he is going to be big government on economic ones too (obviously he isn't given his tax plans, only thing he has going for him is sometimes seeming to express support for universal healthcare) then some Republican free-trade supporters may switch to the Democrats for a time. Especially when it hits the US economy that protectionism doesn't work, then the left-wing of the Democratic Party may give that idea up and re-double their focus on income inequality, social justice and environmentalism - something which is the anti-thesis of what Trump stands for. The truth is and has always been that free trade benefits both sides, both economies grow. The problem is that while the pie grew larger the slice of the pie that the middle-class got shrunk. Now that could've easily been solved by taxing the wealthy who reaped the benefits and share that larger pie more evenly. Republicans refused to even consider that, which is why you have the largest wealth inequality since before the Great Depression, and now all of a sudden you are stuck with this guy who will ultimately shrink the pie rather than redistribute the wealth of the larger pie. In fact he intend to redistribute less, shrinking the slice of the middle-class even more.
You don't have a point. You're continuously asking rhetorical questions that I can only assume you believe are relevant. Your whole argument is that you voted against cronyism by supporting Trump, yet Trump has shown himself to be all in favor of cronyism. Your vote was rightfully your vote, and what you did with it was entirely up to you. However if you actually give a shit about the things you are complaining about it is on YOU to hold him accountable. Not to make excuses for him.
Actually the mantra of the Nazi Party was that everything was the fault of Jewish bankers (like the Rotchild's, George Soros or some other phantom "elite") and Jews in general (a religious minority group) and that the "mainstream media" was the "Lügenpresse" (the lyin' media). Sounds familiar?
Answer the questions and we can move forward with a discussion. They are not rhetorical.
You are missing the point. You just want to keep going around and around. You think your side has some kind of moral superiority in this.
Your attitude is such that oh my side would never screw us. Oh they are looking out for my best interest.
They are not on your side. None of them are. The ACA is prime example of it.
You act as though any of what he is doing is out of the ordinary. So far he is appointing exactly what he said he was going to appoint. If you think anyone of those appointments are part of the republican establishment your wrong. Are they business related yes they are.
- - - Updated - - -
Please read before you go forward:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/.../naziprog.html
- - - Updated - - -
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/.../naziprog.html
go read
You know these so called "wortheless fucks" used to just get Medicaid before Obamacare, and they still do if their income is below the threshold. Anyone else get Obamacare because THEY ARE WORKING.
feel free to link your W2 insurance Box 12 for the year prior so we can see how affordable your insurance was. Just want to see that one box you can hide everything else. mine has been over the 18k you are talking about for at least 8 years now.
We used to have bigger issues then : "He mocked a special needs person", mostly because then, the president of the United States had never mocked a special needs person in public. If you mock a special needs person, you do not respect them. How are you supposed to represent an entire slice of your population, if you can't even respect them. The same goes for minorities and women.
It's the same about women, he has shown time and time again he doesn't respect women. How would you feel if Trump had molested your wife by grabbing her by the P$$$. Would you simply forgive him, because he has bigger problems facing him then the assault of a single women?
The leader of the "free world" mocks disabled people, and gropes women.
You speak of your life, and how you should be a standard for others that have had a difficult life. Trump is also set to be a standard. He is the standard to which all americans should strive for. He is their leader. He represents an entire people, the most powerful nation in the world. No wonder the world looks down on americans. Look at who they chose as a role model.
Your questions are childishly rhetorical, but I'll play along...
I didn't assume he'd do anything other than what he's done. Which to date, is to basically ignore his promises, appoint people who reinforce the idea that he never intended to "drain the swamp", make stupid and irrational statements on Twitter, and deny reality.
I didn't expect anything from him. I didn't vote for him simply because I believe he doesn't comprehend the full breadth of the office. I expected nothing worthwhile from him and so far he has lived up to that expectation.
I don't even know what your side is. Your arguments are barely coherent. You seem to believe you are some sort of anti-establishment/anti-Washington warrior, but at the same time you defend him doing the ordinary, Washington things. It's not so much that I'm missing your point, as it is that your point is meaningless.
Last edited by NYC17; 2017-01-16 at 10:18 PM.