Originally Posted by
Arikan
Of course I can guess. Here are some guesses:
- You yourself didn't read it.
- The primary point of what you quoted doesn't fit with the narrative you want to create, so you ignored it.
- The actual conclusion of the study isn't something you want to discuss.
- You just love to cherry-pick data.
- Having multiple factors is confusing to you, so you just went with the one that said what you wanted to hear.
Those are my guesses.
As to the first... ok, I'm not asking you to type out a wall of text. Its just that the majority of what you posted from the article isn't even talking about the point you were trying to make... so why post it at all. Its like if I posted a block of text from an article about endangered animals that talked about the dwindling cheetah population, then said we need to do more to protect elephants from poachers. Sure, they're connected, but why didn't I post a quote about elephants if that's the topic I wanted to get across?
Do you even brain?*
*This question is rhetorical. Nobody on Gen-OT brains.