its seriously just the other political side being beyond stupid fucking butthurt that thier person didnt win, this shit wont mean jack fuck. the world isnt ending, we arnt turning into nazis. its just qqqqqqqqq.
- - - Updated - - -
yeh boy did russia make democrats do shady shit, god damn those crafty kgb for rigging clinton to beat bernie.
I think you are already on a break, and for good
You people are so arrogantly ignorant that cannot even get the historical facts through your skull even when presented to you graphically ...
He is a laying con artist with misogynistic, egomaniacal psychopathic behavior and no respect to science ,equality or progress who already screwed alot of people and already is in violation of Constitution on day one,
But no, you do not believe in facts, or observable measurements, no. It's of course the same as when right wingers thought Obama is gonna lock them up in Walmart and invade the southern states to take their guns and ban straight marriage.
As a chilean i feel a little safe. Was talkin with my mom about trumps presidency and the only good thing is that we live fucking 12000 kms away from the shit. We can even survive a nuclear armaggedon.
Please.... please skroe you and your conservstives, rally together, and protest trump, do not let him have any bresthing room. We (as a world) need for the first time that your people and the dems act together. Global warming is too fucking important to let this monkey to ruin everything. We now have the bigges forest fire in recorded history in my country, because of the droughts (agw again). We cant let this slide
Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker
http://heavy.com/news/2017/01/how-ma...ndance-photos/
http://www.nbc26.com/news/national/w...erican-history
You cherry pick a lowball estimate so that makes it fact? Truth is, you can't estimate how many people showed up to protest based off a shitty picture showing Lincoln Park.
You have confirmation bias and see what you want to see.
:edit: Just went to that obviously biased twitter you linked. They estimate 500k women showed up in DC. That is nowhere near Trumps inauguration. Save yourself the embarrassment and stop posting.
Last edited by ujx; 2017-01-21 at 11:00 PM.
The alliance with Saudi Arabia is purely pragmatic and based on sound history. In the 1980s it was the US and Saudi Arabia that conspired together to crash the cost of a barrell of oil, which drove the Soviet Economy into a depression. In combination with immense political change in the country, the Afghan War, Chernobyl, and Eastern European anti-Communist movements, the entire thing was destroyed.
Saudi Arabia in other words, as the effective veto wielding member of the global oil supply, is the kind of country we want our our side, or they _will_ be on the others side and used against us.
Secure access to energy supplies is a legimtate reason to have good relations with a country. It's a moral compromise to be sure, but a modest one. That fundamental relationship, as evidenced by how it played a role in destroying the USSR, is worth the downside. Or let me put it another way. If the opportunity cost of partnering with the Saudis to have privelged access to global energy supplies and destroying the USSR in the process was the spread of Wahabbiism, I'd call that a bargain. The former goal is much more significant than the latter problem.
In theory there could be, but it's unlikely. The US Navy seems less interested in naming every carrier after every President anymore (Congress can also order it, but they've declined to of course). The current Carrier that is 99% complete is the first in Class Gerald R. Ford. It's succesor, ready in 4 years, is the second Aircraft carrier named John F Kennedy (rather than the first named "William Jefferson Clinton). The first USS John F Kennedy carrier was a historically important ship and retired a decade ago, but the fact that the US Navy looped around to a President who already had a carrier is telling I feel.
Furthermore the third Ford-class carrier's name is to be... "USS Enterprise", which succeeds the historically important USS Enterprise that was retired in 2012. Some in Congress wanted to name the ship USS Arizona. Others wanted to name it USS America, another famous carrier, which ended up being the name of the new Marine's Amphibious Assault Ship class. The funding for the fourth Ford class should begin in the next budget, but a name is a few years out. I fully expect it to be named after a famous World War II ship or battle, or historic figure in the politics or Navy. Another USS Benjamin Franklin, USS Kitty Hawk, USS Constellation or USS Ranger is probable.
At the same time the Navy has started to name other ships after President. The Jimmy Carter is the third, and most advanced, of the Sea Wolf class attack submarines (and is probably the most advanced submarine in the world). That's fitting because Carter was a submariner. The USS Lyndon B. Johnson is the name for the third, final and most advanced Zumwalt Class destroyer. It will be a frighteningly advanced and prominent ship to be sure, but not a carrier.
Bill Clinton is 70. George W Bush is 70. Barack Obama is 55. To be honest, I doubt Clinton or Bush will ever get carriers. Amphibious Assault ships or Attack submarines maybe. And considering the ruinous tenure of Barack Obama lackey Ray Mabus as Secretary of the Navy, considering Barack Obama's "lead from behind" foreign policy, I kind of doubt he will get a carrier any time soon either. Maybe at the later end of Ford class run.
Could there be a USS Donald Trump one day? Maybe. But I'd expect a lot of recycled names for the Ford-class first.
to early to tell.
Member: Dragon Flight Alpha Club, Member since 7/20/22
The banner on the account is openly mocking Trump and you want to tell me there is no bias in their reporting? A laughable lowball estimate of the turnout and the plethora of negative Trump articles don't set off any alarms?
- - - Updated - - -
Thanks for the hyperbole. I'll be sure to file it next to "Trump is Hitler" and in between "Hillary has a 90% chance of winning".