Last edited by mmoc957ac7b970; 2017-01-22 at 08:45 AM.
The episodes about Troi's mother were a hoot.
- - - Updated - - -
What "Star Trek stands for" started going out the window as soon as Roddenberry died. Deep Space Nine was not a show that Roddenberry would have approved of at all, in my view, based on things Roddenberry told writers and media over the years. Perhaps that's why it's arguably the best series.
This. If you're going to watch any of them, this is the one.
- - - Updated - - -
I remember reading somewhere that DS9 works better if you think of it more as a story about the Bajorans, than a Star Trek series, or something like that, so that might help your quandry somewhat.
How joyous to be in such a place! Where phishing is not only allowed, it is encouraged!
The important thing to realize about ST: DS9 was that only about half the regular cast played Starfleet personnel. It was never going to be a typical Star Trek show.
Since I haven't seen it mentioned here yet, one that hit me right in the feels:
TNG: S03E20 - Tin Man
also a mention for:
TNG: S03E04 - Who Watches the Watchers
My DK
(retired since januari 2017) solely playing PoE now.
Its a necessary episode that shows the problems Gene vision always had with star trek. Hes was kinda similar to prequel Lucas where his vision was the only thing, unlike young Lucas that really dug deep for help because he always thought of himself as a terrible writer. For TOS Gene hated the red tape he had and wanted full control. Which he was given for the first 2 season of TNG, which unsurprisingly were some of the worst star trek ever for the most part with episodes down right offensive, terrible and boring and with most of his writer absolutely hating working for him.
Having a vision simply does not make you a screenwriter or an executive director it turns out.
With regards to "Pale Moonlight" I guess I tend to side with a77 to a degree. I think it's a well-made episode and I like the unique narrative structure and challenging moral dilemma. However, watching it in 2017, the theme of patting oneself on the back for conveniently abandoning moral principles does seem a bit cheap and cliche (and a bit anti-Trek), albeit an attitude that's very much in vogue at the moment.
That said, DS9 is about a Wild West situation where these guys are out in the boondocks in a very tough situation, and they have to make a lot of compromises. Romulans on one side, Cardassians on the other, a precarious alliance with the Klingons, the Dominion pouring in trying to destabilize everything, so the Federation is perhaps at its most desperate here. So it's understandable.
Sometimes I like to watch Trek through a subtextual lens; what if what we're seeing is only one skewed perspective? Change just a couple things and Picard is an amazing demagogic villain (I think Q once called him a Roman centurion patrolling the outer reaches of the empire). His post-Locutus dealings with the Borg are a good place to start. What if Sisko really is just a shell-shocked and schizophrenic lunatic struggling to deal with the massive pain and loss he's suffered? What if the Prime Directive, as Chakotay actor Robert Beltran argued, is just self-serving fascist hegemony? What if the Maquis, for example, are the real good guys? Why does Dr. Crusher get so excited about performing autopsies every single week? I don't necessarily believe those things, but it's a fun moral exercise to have.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah I like the occasional episode when someone like Lwaxana or Q strides in and takes everyone down a peg.