Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucrece View Post
    Not as a affliction with demon skin. There's not a single WQ I can't tank myself with drain soul spam, siphon life, death coil, healthstone, and unrelenting resolve.

    I can do Collaborators or the Conspiracy elite WQ's in suramar by pulling packs myself as affliction and keeping siphon life rolling alongside channeling drain soul.

    If I'm feeling extra faceroll, I bring phantom singularity and it's virtually impossible to die unless you pulled and entire hall of elite mobs in suramar.
    I'm failing to see where you can't use voidwalker in this scenario
    ..and so he left, with terrible power in shaking hands.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Netherspark View Post
    Lose Meta to Demon Hunters
    Get a Demon Hunter pet

    okay

    notbad.jpg
    I am the one who knocks ... because I need your permission to enter.

  3. #23
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by FelPlague View Post
    i think blizz should just allow us to "enslave" demons like a hunter, so we can choose what we want, have them each have a differant build, like how hunters have it now, they each fit a family, dreadlords=doomguard, inquisitor eye=imp, inquisitor= doomguard
    In the lore we don't tame demons, we summon them. However, the idea is interessting. I would preffer if all demons were alike in power, with unique utility. That way we can pick and choose what we want for whatever we do, questing, PvPing or raiding. If the requirements for summoning these demons would demand certain quests that involved learning about the demon we summon. Then we'd would be forced into the world, hunt down the demons we want in order to learn how to summon them. Also, more sexy Succubusses for my army of demons please. I'd love a reason to use this one in a boss fight.

  4. #24
    Bloodsail Admiral DaHomieG's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,191
    I wish there was a glyph to replace the felhound with this:



    Please Blizzard

  5. #25
    Scarab Lord TriHard's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    FF14 > WoW. Not an opinion, that's facts.
    Posts
    4,344
    They couldn't give the old succubus ( even though it's updated) pants because people would get triggered, so I suppose they gave this one some pants to satisfy Anita
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by DaHomieG View Post
    I wish there was a glyph to replace the felhound with this:



    Please Blizzard
    looks epic but the doomguard and infernal are already too big imo

  7. #27
    Merely a Setback FelPlague's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    27,603
    Quote Originally Posted by Colactic View Post
    In the lore we don't tame demons, we summon them. However, the idea is interessting. I would preffer if all demons were alike in power, with unique utility. That way we can pick and choose what we want for whatever we do, questing, PvPing or raiding. If the requirements for summoning these demons would demand certain quests that involved learning about the demon we summon. Then we'd would be forced into the world, hunt down the demons we want in order to learn how to summon them. Also, more sexy Succubusses for my army of demons please. I'd love a reason to use this one in a boss fight.
    well yes we dont tame them, but we have enslave demon, so we should be able to enslave it, then learn to summon that demon

    we have control pitlords and other great demons before...

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Count Zero View Post
    Lose Meta to Demon Hunters
    Get a Demon Hunter pet

    okay

    notbad.jpg
    demon hunter pet? whut? its literally just an armoured upgraded sucubus
    Quote Originally Posted by WowIsDead64 View Post
    Remove combat, Mobs, PvP, and Difficult Content

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Baconeggcheese View Post
    We should probably question how we're supposed to enjoy this when balance is done intentionally so that we don't want to use the pet.
    Literally my first thought.

  9. #29
    Immortal Raugnaut's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Frogspoison#1419 Battletag
    Posts
    7,134
    Quote Originally Posted by jojoushi View Post
    Why the pants ?
    Someone at blizz has a fetish for pants, duh.

    A nice buff, if only the Succubus was actually USED outside of a CC-oriented PvP thing.

    Warlocks been going downhill ever since they got rid of the warlock dev.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moounter View Post
    I think your problem is a lack of intellect.

  10. #30
    Deleted
    Great glyph.

    Now let me use the pet.

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by FelPlague View Post
    demon hunter pet? whut? its literally just an armoured upgraded sucubus
    dictionary.reference.com/browse/joke
    I am the one who knocks ... because I need your permission to enter.

  12. #32
    Really impressed with this.

    But like others, I wish I had a reason to use her. Forcing us in to one pet per spec was not a great idea. Then again, if she did as much damage as my doomguard, I still wouldn't use her, due to the run between targets annoyance. Sigh.

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Xeranath View Post
    Really impressed with this.

    But like others, I wish I had a reason to use her. Forcing us in to one pet per spec was not a great idea. Then again, if she did as much damage as my doomguard, I still wouldn't use her, due to the run between targets annoyance. Sigh.
    You know, pets running between targets doesn't really take any longer than a Doomguard takes to cast. Plus she has a 20 yard range on her attacks anyway.

  14. #34
    Looks good, but...why are they making glyphs for a pet basically no one uses? I think they would better spend their time making other glyphs for different pets/spells...

  15. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by gar1234 View Post
    Looks good, but...why are they making glyphs for a pet basically no one uses? I think they would better spend their time making other glyphs for different pets/spells...
    You have the cause and effect confused. They didn't make a new Succubus model for Warlocks because they were bored or think it'll encourage pet diversity or someone in the art department has a fetish. They made some new Succubus models for the upcoming Tomb of Sargaras raid, and decided to get out ahead of player requests for once and immediately offered up a glyph to give Warlock players access to them. Which is commendable, even if the Succubus is still a useless pet that never gets used.

  16. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Baconeggcheese View Post
    I'm failing to see where you can't use voidwalker in this scenario
    Because it's useless and I'm better off with a doomguard/infernal to get my shit done faster anyways?

    The only purpose of that pet is to tank, but there's no content where I need the voidwalker to tank for me where said voidwalker would not die immediately. Open world is the only place I can use a voidwalker much like a succubus, but both are suboptimal pets.
    Last edited by Lucrece; 2017-01-26 at 04:33 AM.

  17. #37
    Hmmm, if only there's a reason to bring them out.

  18. #38
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucrece View Post
    Not as a affliction with demon skin. There's not a single WQ I can't tank myself with drain soul spam, siphon life, death coil, healthstone, and unrelenting resolve.

    I can do Collaborators or the Conspiracy elite WQ's in suramar by pulling packs myself as affliction and keeping siphon life rolling alongside channeling drain soul.

    If I'm feeling extra faceroll, I bring phantom singularity and it's virtually impossible to die unless you pulled and entire hall of elite mobs in suramar.
    But by any reasonable measure the succubus is the last pet you'd use. Basically you're saying that the pet is rendered so irrelevant you can use one that is essentially useless. And you won;t be doing this in 7.2 because those elites will be back to what they were before we outgeared them by crazy amounts.

    I don;t get why they'd spend so much time and effort making such a terrific looking pet by focussing on the succubus, as it has zero use whatever outside of pvp. Indeed, the specialisations are designed that way: each one pushes you to use a specific pet and using the succubus as any warlock spec if a dps loss. For affliction and destruction the only viable choices are the Supremacy demons - doomguard for single target, infernal for aoe/tank or the specific spec pet in the form of the felhunter and imp for damage and the voidwalker and a tank if you don't have Supremacy.

    I have long said that I'd love for the succubus to be viable, particularly for affliction (I think she actually fits better with the fantasy, with Lash of Pain: we kill our victim slowly, she makes them enjoy it lol)

    Can but hope for rejigs on the other demons. The succubus redesign looks great. But in pve you just won't use it

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by derpkitteh View Post
    now give me the glyph that gives me incubus, female felguard, female wrathguard, etc.

    been waiting on those since cataclysm.
    You won't get an incubus because they are demon rapists.

    Succubi seduce their victims. The wow succubus even has that as an ability.

    Incubi are a bit more umm "direct" in what they do....

    I think it's a shame our poets are so limited. We've had whole expansions based around demons, in Legion we wield a legendary weapon...and these are the best we can bind to our wills?

    Particularly demonology. You don;t feellike a "master of demons" when all you got is some lowly imps, dogs and a felguard. At least you get a fel-lord in PVP.

    The irony being in WoD you tier armour randomly summoned a much wider variety of demons

  19. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by Farron69 View Post
    They couldn't give the old succubus ( even though it's updated) pants because people would get triggered, so I suppose they gave this one some pants to satisfy Anita
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
    Anita Sarkeesian is the Trofim Lysenko of video games. - Troy Leavitt

    Succubus model looks good, but I'm still waiting to do more with her than PVP or /flirt.
    Back when dot snapshotting was a thing, I wrote this piece of junk.

  20. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Nebiroth99 View Post
    You won't get an incubus because they are demon rapists.

    Succubi seduce their victims. The wow succubus even has that as an ability.

    Incubi are a bit more umm "direct" in what they do....

    I think it's a shame our poets are so limited. We've had whole expansions based around demons, in Legion we wield a legendary weapon...and these are the best we can bind to our wills?

    Particularly demonology. You don;t feellike a "master of demons" when all you got is some lowly imps, dogs and a felguard. At least you get a fel-lord in PVP.

    The irony being in WoD you tier armour randomly summoned a much wider variety of demons
    succubi are rapists, too. they seduce in a way that's much more rape than seduction. forcing the semen out of the penis, then they either transform into the incubus and rape a woman or give it to an incubus to rape a woman and impregnate her, depending on the mythology you go with.

    besides, they're simply based on religious demons. they don't have to behave the same exact way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •