Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Trump is a liar. Water is wet. We breath air to survive. MMO Champion posters are the pinnacle of political discourse.
Ok that last one was fake.
- - - Updated - - -
By this logic, every pundit that was pro-Trump has zero credibility as well. Oopsie, guess your own bad logic backfired.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Now now, let's calm down. You don't need to quote Trump verbatim.
You can quote his press secretary verbatim!
"n9y25ah7"
-- Sean Spicer, Jan 25
"Aqenbpuu"
-- Sean Spicer, Jan 26
That's right, twice since taking his position, Sean Spicer tweeted a length of nonsense letters and numbers that look a lot like a password.
And the internet never forgets. Go ahead and type "aqen" in your Google search bar. See what it autocompletes.
The funniest thing is Bannon asked for this NYTimes interview. To tell them how useless they are. Or something.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...-from-nonciti/
"Oops, we lied about Trump lying. Again"
Trump’s order for “major investigation” into voter fraud is based on misquoted ODU research
sourceOriginally Posted by pilotonline
Hahaha, that's hilarious.
- - - Updated - - -
So you told a lie about lying about lying?
http://pilotonline.com/news/local/tr...99719bc13.html
It's pretty ironic that conservatives spend all day bashing NYT and WaPo for being biased fake news, but when they want to give their upstart wingnut rag a credible sounding name to trick people into thinking it's a legit source, they go with "Washington Times" and hope that the readers are too stupid to notice that all the articles are nothing but partisan spin and misdirection.
Worse the study is based on Polls
so they ask people ''did you vote and are you a citizen or not'' and based on that this guy came up with X numbers that says CLinton could have gotten X number of votes.Based on national polling by a consortium of universities,
So it's based around assumption and build up with further assumptions.
If voter fraud was real don't you think that republicans would have gotten something at this point?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.70cdc985f679