It is a very poor euphemism. It invokes the concept of physical violence, which some of those on the left have resorted to.
I for one do not give two shits what a actor's opinion is on politics. They are actors, nothing special outside of that. Using their platform to express political opinions is unprofessional in my opinion. In a interview and asked about politics, that would be different.
I'd split this up but mobile editing sucks on my phone.
The 1980 and 81-82 recession are related, even says so on Wiki. The tech bubble "recession" was caused by the fed, the recession in itself is barely considered one Anna's hardly meets was criteria of a recession. It's not even worth mentioning. I started around 1980 because it's somewhat similar to our economy in function and driving. Why mention the 50s when we wouldn't care if there was a draught or whale oil prices are going up. Late 70s early 80s is a solid start of globalization and it's effects.
On terrorism. I 100% agree. But that isn't what you originally mentioned. You and a lot of other people liked to mention Nazi and compare that propaganda to now. There is no state sponsored propaganda. There is no support or evidence to show for state, affiliate propaganda campaigns. They don't exist. News is the closest we get, and it's largely laughable attempts at stirring up ratings.
As you said though, there is still a threat and we do owe it to do our best to address it. Just not this travel ban shit, I get it's intention, it makes sense in a cold methodical sense, but it's pretty asinine from a logic standpoint.
But no where is any of this warrant comparisons to the Nazi.
In this matter you are fascists employing the same terror methods that Nazis and Communists used against dissenters. You use violence. Every time you do this, the gap between left and right increases as more join the right.
The right has always been a reactive force to the left. The more you push, the more we will push back.
You got a big mouth for someone supporting Communism whose birth country is now one of the closest to Nazi Germany. It must be sad to support an ideology that is dead.
Last edited by DJ117; 2017-01-31 at 03:04 PM.
Not directing this directly at you, but again, Donald Trump did similar shit, and now he's President. People were waving that shit off as just talk. Can people be fucking consistent for once?
Why is it everyone hand waved Trump's bullshit, while running as leader of the free world no less, but are all over this random guy accepting a random award?
9 out of 10 people agree that in a room full of 10 people one person will always disagree with the other 9.
The ratings from the clips of this statement outweigh the ratings of this award show's entire historical existence. I legit did not even know this awards show was a thing. I find it amusing that some uneducated (generally) actors feel the need to speak their own words for once, and have them received as well as the ones they repeat for a living.
And we already have people advocating for violence against Breibart writers now, pure insanity.
Fascism from both sides, left is no better then the right.
Neither a state communist or a Russian.
And if punching Nazis turns more people into Nazis.. well.. then I really have no good words for those people.
Seems like a low bar to turn to wanting to gas the jews.
- - - Updated - - -
With trump in charge, its now the job of Germany.
Better resist that urge for a 4th reich!
You have always hated Jews. The communist terrorist groups of the past targeted Jews and Israel. In recent times, you have been pro Islam and pro Palestine, and fighting and boycotting Israel at every turn.
There are no national socialists, only nationalists. There are no communists left, only regressive fascists. We punch hardest. You lost.
Which proves that rebanding works. Just make whites/males/christians your enemy, advocate for violence in the name of equality, censor and screech at other viewpoints and gather a mindless mob mentality.
Liberalism is truly rebranded fascism and the sheep flock to it despite being "educated" about the past. It just proves that useful idiots will never cease to exist for the elites and powerful to take advantage of as fodder for their goals.
The core conceit behind Communism isn't genocide, it is for fascism.
- - - Updated - - -
No, it's the rationale behind self-defense.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, I have no issue with defending myself by attacking Nazis and making them too afraid to fight back. "Never Again" might mean nothing to you, but it does to me and a lot of people.
- - - Updated - - -
Considering that systemic genocide against white people hasn't really been a THING in the West? No.
Edit:
Ok, look. Is political violence good? In the pure abstract sense, no, it's bad. However, when it comes to the protection of human rights, too much is at stake to take violence off the table outright. And when the opponents are out-and-out fascists, there are not a lot of options on the table to begin with.
This is pretty obviously wrong. Implementing communism requires stripping property holders of all of their goods; this will effectively result in mass murder, as has been observed time and again. Claiming otherwise is the moral equivalent of Spencer's "non-violent ethnic cleansing". It's not possible, this isn't how it works - dispossessing people of everything they own results in resistance, which results in mass murder. There are basically no examples of this going any other way.
So, punch a communist day then?
- - - Updated - - -
Where's Haiti?
Christ some of you people and your moral high grounds over one another.
Get over it, it's just a punch. Barfights happen. Guy was a nazi, don't defend that shit.
Free speech and all that, sure, but freedom enough for others to accept your free speech as shit and react accordingly.
They should own up to being a dipshit instead of whinging about the 'left' or 'violence against words' as if it's some new trending thing.