It's very clear. From his posts, it shows he has very little experience in any professional setting. He's yelling for Data about things that are standard in any financial statement. I'd tell him to go look at his company's financials, instead of googling for his answers, but real life examples come hard sometimes.
I'm actually citing my company's financials which are confidential with regard to their specifics, but this trend has been confirmed by a majority of claims as well, namely the tech industry and hospitals.
My dad was underpaid on his H1b visa as an anesthesiologist by almost 110K, but that's another vague comment.
You should cite your company's financials as well, but it seems you don't have access to them.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
So America wants to become 1990s China to beat 2010s China? Top kek.
Uh huh.
This is the weirdest iteration of internet tough guy I've ever seen.You should cite your company's financials as well, but it seems you don't have access to them.
I mean this really is super simple. If you're discussing national labor policy, claims should be based in verifiable facts with like numbers and stuff. Not nonspecific anecdotes that can't be in any way verified or backed up.
Challenge Mode : Play WoW like my disability has me play:
You will need two people, Brian MUST use the mouse for movement/looking and John MUST use the keyboard for casting, attacking, healing etc.
Briand and John share the same goal, same intentions - but they can't talk to each other, however they can react to each other's in game activities.
Now see how far Brian and John get in WoW.
From my understanding it's not being ended but just upping the minimum base pay, from 60,000 to 130,000 (think the 60,000 was set back in the 90's?)
if they are that highly skilled doesn't 60'd seem a bit low?
I found the article
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/04/u...ents.html?_r=0
No you're right, it is simple. I can very easily state that your graph contains a subset of H1b workers, which in conjunction with improvements in technology directly supports the argument that the workerbase in America is very productive without seeing the proportional pay increase, as suggested by the flatline of the salary line. Therefore, based on your own data, you have a high productivity with no increase in pay due partly to Improvements in tech, and partly to H1b brain drain.
Second, I told you that these claims have a company specific base (my company). I just won't show them to you. Salary information is confidential, and productivity is subjective. You can read any article for those vague generalizations if you want for generalized national labor policy. Clearly, the story that is cited by these individuals who are behind this national policy change to stop H1b has a story aligns with mine.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence[note 1] and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;