I am not talking about refugees, refugees deserve protection under the law and are an entirely different matter. I think thats an interesting topic and deserving attention what europe can and should do, but it is absolutely not what I am talking about.
I was talking about the differences you experience when you come about people of different cultures, especially very conservative ones (when it comes to gender equality yada yada), in low income, low education settings and high income, high education settings.
In the example I proposed I used "afghan" nationality as merely a placeholder for "very foreign". I mean whats not to like about having an afghani doctor as your neighbor? Except that he is taking up the space of two supermodells, fucking nothing.
I think citizenship is easier to obtain in some EU countries than it is on others, especially for people from former colonial teritories. Which the countries of europe have had many of. The UK themselves has debated how to handle the fallout that comes with free movement and the right to settle within the empire for not decades but probably centuries. France has been experiencing the consequences for several decades at least.
You will have to seek your debate about inter EU migration, especially the case of workers from eastern europe migrating for work into the UK, with someone else though. I think expanding the EU east was a bright idea, although it lacked refinement in its execution. I dont approve Brexit, I think it was a bad idea.
However I get why some people feel differently about it. I think many saw the vote for Brexit as a surrogate and a means to send a message.