Yes
No
I don't expect most voters to be familiar with Orwell, fortunately.
- - - Updated - - -
Actually, no. I was highly critical of the ACA for not including a public option largely because I view private health insurance as an unsustainable pyramid scheme.
Coastal liberal elites such as myself are blue, not red.
Where does he even praise Obamacare once? How does stating that Red states receive the most welfare yet vote to get rid of it label them as inferior? "wont take the honor of exposing you." Holy shit man at least have some context or quotes or something before you go off and make yourself look nonsensical.
People typically only care when it's not their candidate, this isn't a new phenomenon.
I am the lucid dream
Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh
It wasn't the ultimate healthcare solution thanks in large part to Republican obstructionism and Obama having to add a ton of pork to the bill before it was allowed to pass. The ACA wasn't anywhere close to how it was originally envisioned and that's what we get for trying to compromise with those who did nothing but obstruct. Amazingly now they have the gall to turn around and tell the democratic party to suck it up and stop obstructing .
If you admittedly don't know anything about it then your opinion doesn't hold much water I'm sorry to say.
Prior to the ACA passing you couldn't even be put on most insurance policies thanks to pre-existing conditions. After it passed a record number of people had affordable health insurance for the very first time and they didn't need to put themselves in debt for a simple appendicitis surgery or chemotherapy treatment for cancer. Yes it wasn't affordable for everyone and some people saw their premiums go up but overwhelming it was beneficial to the US citizens at large.
"It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."
I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)
I think there's a fair share of people who did so.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
I just realized that you answered a different question. Now you saying doublethink makes more sense as it explains how people can agree with bullshit as long as it's from someone they support. I was going about how it doesn't really seem like that's happening. She fucked up and she got a warning as there's no punishment mentioned in the actual law and it's left to the discretion of whoever dispenses the punishment. If she was being lauded as a hero or some other bullshit or if there was no comment on this then sure, i'd agree that it's an issue because whoever was in charge fucked up as well.
If it's being handled i don't see how it's an issue, let alone a big enough issue to go out and say that all Trump supporters like corruption.
Well it does say His position. That clearly vindicates her because she is not a he. Don't you dare try to use gender neutral terms either, because that would be sexist. If you haven't noticed, I am doing this on purpose.