Hundreds of thousands rally in Iran against Trump, chant 'Death to America'

[Deleted]

So the US is banging the War drums.
The Twitter in Chief threatened war.
The US reapplied Sanctions even tough Iran is following the Nuclear deal.
Americans are howling about "Liberation".
Spicer was caught lying about Iran attacking a American ship.

Yet you are surprised that they are screaming at America to go die?

[Aeula]

Welp. All the more reason to enforce a travel ban on Iran.

[zenkai]

I think Iran just gave Trump a good argument why we shouldn't let them test missiles.

[purebalance]

So much this.
It's not like Iran introduced a bill that would allow them to start a war with the US, because that would be idiotic.


They already have a system where the unpopular dude becomes the leader No need to bring American Democracy^TM over there.

You mean the slightly less popular one who knew what the rules of the game were. Trump could have easily worked to get popular vote and lost like Hillary did.

[lordsphinx]

It's funny that you only chose to qoute hardliners whom are equivalent to tea-party in US.

No, these aren’t just hardliners. These quotes are from the Ayatollah, the President, Chief Military advisors, etc etc. Comparing them to a fringe political party with no real political power. There is a stark difference here.

And no, blastic missile technology is not banned by UN when it comes to Iran.

Yes, it is. You shouldn't be talking out of your ass when you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about...

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1929, from 2010, says the Security Council "decides that Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities."

And:

U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231, passed in 2015, the Security Council endorsed the nuclear deal, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA. It terminated the provisions of the 2010 resolution and added language deep in one of the annexes saying: "Iran is called upon not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology, until the date eight years after the JCPOA Adoption Day or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, whichever is earlier."

It’s really amazing that liberals can sleep easy at night defending countries like Iran, who blatantly sponsor terrorism and Jihad, while throwing fucking temper tantrums if a bakery won’t cater a gay wedding or a county demands that people use the bathroom that corresponds with their gender at birth. Un-fucking-believable.

[Rooflesstoofless]

What is the alternative? Allow them to proliferate unchecked?

I mean OK, Ill be the first to say let them nuke each other into oblivion in the ME, but then I'd be accused of being heartless.

I always thought a ME would be a great place for the rest of the world to store their radioactive waste. It would be even easier to find if it glowed in the dark!

[purebalance]

It's more than that, it's sympathy with the people of Iran.
The people there are pretty awesome and the ayatollah's are losing power, they'll be gone before 2030.
Iran is going to be the centre of the Middle East. And they aren't in bed with the US, which is why they get harassed this much.

Attacking this country would be a crime against humanity that would ruin the entire Middle East for the next 30 years.

- - - Updated - - -


It are Iranians.
So the worst that could happen is that your country becomes a better place, especially since it reduces the percentage of idiots.

I'll have to agree on this. Persians that I know(not sure if it makes a difference they prefer to be called Persian versus Iranian) are actually fairly well off and decently educated although 1 of them who is a doctor was asked to leave there and that's why he's here(he drank) and the other is some version of Muslim that seems almost like a gypsy or hippie it was hard understanding how she explained it and she didn't feel welcome there.

[Deleted]

No, these aren’t just hardliners. These quotes are from the Ayatollah, the President, Chief Military advisors, etc etc. Comparing them to a fringe political party with no real political power. There is a stark difference here.



Yes, it is. You shouldn't be talking out of your ass when you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about...

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1929, from 2010, says the Security Council "decides that Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities."

And:

U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231, passed in 2015, the Security Council endorsed the nuclear deal, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA. It terminated the provisions of the 2010 resolution and added language deep in one of the annexes saying: "Iran is called upon not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology, until the date eight years after the JCPOA Adoption Day or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, whichever is earlier."

It’s really amazing that liberals can sleep easy at night defending countries like Iran, who blatantly sponsor terrorism and Jihad, while throwing fucking temper tantrums if a bakery won’t cater a gay wedding or a county demands that people use the bathroom that corresponds with their gender at birth. Un-fucking-believable.

The Security Council? LOL You mean the group that America votes veto on everything that does not fit its view? When was the last time a SC vote went through that effected the US in a similiar way?

Oh my the Organisation the US has so much control over decided something about a Enemy of the US. Clearly their judgement will not be biased in any way.

[lordsphinx]

The Security Council? LOL You mean the group that America votes veto on everything that does not fit its view? When was the last time a SC vote went through that effected the US in a similiar way?

Oh my the Organisation the US has so much control over decided something about a Enemy of the US. Clearly their judgement will not be biased in any way.

@Dumbleduck said that there was no UN resolution restricting Iran’s ballistic missile program. I showed that there are. Whether or not you agree with that resolution doesn’t make it not real.

[HumbleDuck]

No, these aren’t just hardliners. These quotes are from the Ayatollah, the President, Chief Military advisors, etc etc. Comparing them to a fringe political party with no real political power. There is a stark difference here.



Yes, it is. You shouldn't be talking out of your ass when you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about...

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1929, from 2010, says the Security Council "decides that Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities."

And:

U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231, passed in 2015, the Security Council endorsed the nuclear deal, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA. It terminated the provisions of the 2010 resolution and added language deep in one of the annexes saying: "Iran is called upon not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology, until the date eight years after the JCPOA Adoption Day or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, whichever is earlier."

It’s really amazing that liberals can sleep easy at night defending countries like Iran, who blatantly sponsor terrorism and Jihad, while throwing fucking temper tantrums if a bakery won’t cater a gay wedding or a county demands that people use the bathroom that corresponds with their gender at birth. Un-fucking-believable.

Yes, they are still the tea-party of Iran, very much like Trump and his team right now in US.

About the resolutions you mentioned:

In Resolution 2231, passed in 2015, the Security Council endorsed the nuclear deal, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA. It terminated the provisions of the 1929 (2010) resolution and added language deep in one of the annexes saying: "Iran is called upon not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to becapable of delivering nuclear weapons

So, no there are no restrictions on Iranwhen it comes to developing blastic missiles unless they are designed to deliver nuclear warheads, and even then it can be argued that the language of the resolutions is not restrictive.

It's really amazing that you can sleep at night knowing you qoute stuff without even reading them.

[ati87]

So the US is banging the War drums.
The Twitter in Chief threatened war.
The US reapplied Sanctions even tough Iran is following the Nuclear deal.
Americans are howling about "Liberation".
Spicer was caught lying about Iran attacking a American ship.

Yet you are surprised that they are screaming at America to go die?

But did they all do that yesterday?

If not then it doesn't count at all

[cubby]

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...-idUSKBN15P0QV



Looks like they need some,

/sunglasses

Freedom


YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!~~~

God dammit, now he's banned and I don't get the /sunglasses joke.

Someone please explain it to me.

[Tsar Bomba]

Only on MMO-C could there be perceived sympathy for.... Iran....

This is like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Some of you are quite literally bonkers.

If a crowd in the US was chanting "Death to Islam', convincing the Left that this had some ethereal meaning and wasn't a direct attack on Muslims, would be impossible (rightfully so). Apply the same logic to this situation and the Left has no problem obfuscating "Death to America" or assigning it a more benign meaning. Pathetic.

[DarkTZeratul]

God dammit, now he's banned and I don't get the /sunglasses joke.

Someone please explain it to me.

It's a thing from the TV show CSI.

[Wyrt]

Kind of the end result of overthrowing the Iranian government, having a puppet in place, and then treating them like shit after the puppet was deposed.

[Kaleredar]

The US removing those Iranian Ayatollahs and Revolutionary Guards would be the best thing that could happen to Iran and the Middle East.

The US' track record of unilaterally removing middle eastern leaders has gone just so swimmingly in the past.

[Milchshake]

Jokes on Iran, America is already dead! With the help of Putin, a fatal but slow poison was administered last November.

History just isn't kind to one-party rule.

[schwarzkopf]

People in Iran shout Death To America - people go crazy.
People in the USA shout Death To Clinton - meh, she deserves it.

Be rational folks.

[Celista]

http://www.theonion.com/article/fbi-...k-and-en-35788

Seems relevant.

[shoc]

They have these rallies every year, with 'Death to America' chants and all, but this year it is a rally 'against Trump'?