Someone had to agree to notifications being sent to that phone. If that happened then gl with that lawsuit lol.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
We get it, you don't have your own finances. "Charge by Uber" isn't an itemized receipt. "Charge by uber for trip from 121 East Main to 983 West Front street at 11:30pm" is. Hence why the records are important. Maybe I recently had an uber, but that wasn't the right one. But with your world, I just see "Uber", so I have to assume its the right one. But it's not.
If the bolded was the case, it would be my other, older outlook account, since that was in use (still is somewhat) when the phone was new, and the gmail tied with the phone was created. The new outlook I use, is far newer than either of those, and isn't linked to them in any way. The phone doesn't text me either. It's a sound notification, a unique sound the phone doesn't use for anything else I might add, and it leaves notification in the upper part of the screen, where other notifications like battery status are. I guess you could call it app notification? Dunno.
How's it possible? As far as I know, it shouldn't be. I do like it tho, quite abit. Anyway, since the point of the thread was about notifications where they shouldn't be, and that being violations of some privacy, then maybe I should sue someone for violating my privacy to...myself? ^^
He logged into the app, which has options to opt out of push notifications. He consented that he would receive push notifications when he installed the app and logged into their services, then further neglected to log out or disable notifications. His rights were not violated, he opted in for these notifications and then he scrolled past the EULA and hit accept.
Network Access and Devices.
You are responsible for obtaining the data network access necessary to use the Services. Your mobile network's data and messaging rates and fees may apply if you access or use the Services from your device. You are responsible for acquiring and updating compatible hardware or devices necessary to access and use the Services and Applications and any updates thereto. Uber does not guarantee that the Services, or any portion thereof, will function on any particular hardware or devices. In addition, the Services may be subject to malfunctions and delays inherent in the use of the Internet and electronic communications.
Except the case seems to be that a glitch is sending that information to devices that are not logged into that account but have been at one time.
."The technical fault is thought to be that after you log in to Uber on another device, it can keep information on you as a user and continues to give updates on that phone," the report noted, adding that the issue appears to be limited to the iOS versions of the app updated after Dec. 16, 2016
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
Might be that he either:
1) Didn't *actually* log out and is just saying he did
or
2) Enabled the family notifications
Id is no foult of de husband. De wife shoud have kept her warlord contented.
Following your guys' stupid logic, if the guy used his wife's car to cheat and when he was done he tried to be really thorough in cleaning the vehicle, but missed something and a guy at a car wash the wife took the car to, found it and gave it to her.....then the husband should sue the car wash.
Simple fact of the matter, is that if the husband didn't make the decision to use the wife's phone then Uber doesn't get him caught. His fault.
Also, what proof is there he logged out? And there is a thing that is basically a "soft logout".
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
I have a bank account, thanks very much. I also know that when I buy something, I know how much I'm being charged at the time of purchase, with or out a receipt, because I'm not a fucking idiot that makes a payment without knowing how much that payment is. Generally, the charge gives an abbreviated form of the place I made my purchase from. Also, the dates of the charges line up with the date of purchase (a day or two later when I pay a bill online, though).
If I see "Pizza Hut", and I know that I haven't been to Pizza Hut recently, then I know somehow my bank account how hi-jacked (yes, this happened once).
Well yea but just because something is in an EULA doesn't mean it can't be challenged in court, otherwise they could just put any silly old thing in there and you would be legally bound to it. Generally speaking when using the app a certain level of privacy is expected and it's fair to challenge them on that.