Maybe I should have expressed myself clear. I do not see much connection between needing 300.000 (or more) immigrants and an influx of refugees. Some of those 300k can be refugees if they qualify or will be educated to qualify for the vacant jobs. I would try to seperate the immigration 'system' (you could argue that Germany has none) and the asylum system. The first one is there to fill those vacant jobs and create a relative demographic stability, the other is there to help people in need. The asylum system is not there to satisfy our own interests.
Nevertheless, most of the asylum seekers are quite young. So we can take the chance and try to educate them as best as we can. We do not only need doctors, professors and IT experts, we also need craftsmen, geriatric nurses etc.
Immigrants are not a problem. The problem comes with those who won't adapt to the culture. Usually, arabs are the people who have the least chance/desire to adapt to the their host countries (that gathered from purely personal experience in Canada, france and the UK).
That's not how solving unemployment works or for that matter how unemployment works. People not qualified for a job can hardly be hired for jobs they are not qualified for. You also have season-related unemployment (construction workers for instance), people who are moving to a different place, people who got fired because businesses have closed or simply temporary workers who go from job to job rather than having a fixed job.
In East Thuringia the prognosis is that 25% of all companies have to close not because they are doing bad but because there is a lack of apprentices, there won't be anyone left to run their business. We have jobs for which they already are hiring from overseas especially in healthcare business (clinics and hospitals). We have vocational schools closing because there are barely enough trainees for one class. Schools have been merged or closed because of lack of children. The overall outlook isn't about unemployed people anyway, it is about vacant positions which if not filled will have dramatic side effects. The healthcare sector can already tell you stories about it: The German healthcare industry is already suffering from chronic need to save and chronic understaffing.
Last edited by Ravenblade; 2017-02-15 at 01:56 PM.
WoW: Crowcloak (Druid) & Neesheya (Paladin) @ Sylvanas EU (/ˈkaZHo͞oəl/) | GW2: Siqqa (Asura Engineer) @ Piken Square EU
If builders built houses the way programmers built programs,the first woodpecker to come along would destroy civilization. - Weinberg's 2nd law
He seeks them here, he seeks them there, he seeks those lupins everywhere!
No, not rather pointless. Liberal-conservatism incorporates a lot of (social) liberalism in their policies, which is often left-wing, unless you mean classic liberalism. That doesn't mean the party as a whole suddenly strays from being centre-right due to such policies but it also means that they introduce left-wing policies.
Yeah, but lets vet immigrants first if they actually qualify to pick up an apprenticeship in these professions ok?
You dont get to ask for a german apprentice who has a high school degree at the very least but disregard that when you ask for an immigrant. Lets check wether the immigrant you allegedly need to fill that position passes the same bar. Because even a butcher needs to be able to read, write and understand the native language enough to follow the course and the instructions at his workplace.
Which is a bar 9/10 dont pass.
You do realize that all of these people CREATE jobs as well? They all need food, shelter, healthcare and and and...
And that the vast majority is unemployable is a myth. Mayn will have jobs with a low entry level, which is true, but your claim has no base in reality.
I never said it did. I'm explaining what liberal-conservatism is.
What liberal-conservatism usually incorporates is not classical liberalism, which you seem to be talking about. It's more often socially liberal policies they implement, which is a hallmark of left.
Liberalism =/= liberal-conservatism.
But which is a bar that immigrants will pass in the near future. Language is the real barrier, and this requires school and training.
Current projections show that more than 50% of all immigrants will be regularly employed within 5 years. Better than let them drown in the mediterranean or rot in some border camps.
Final numberes show about 1.1 million in 2015.
OP's "source" took Merkels words way out of context. That makes it made up shit.
Can we stop these sensationalist crap threads please? Would be a good start if people knew what a proper source of information is... reading 3 headlines on that page was enough for me to consider it trash that's not worth the time it takes to read the articles. If their are any sort of emotionally loaded words in the headlines, I don't even bother.
Last edited by Heltoray; 2017-02-15 at 02:02 PM.
Try to understand the context of who I replied too.
Which still, what my whole point was, does not make Merkel left-wing.What liberal-conservatism usually incorporates is not classical liberalism, which you seem to be talking about. It's more often socially liberal policies they implement, which is a hallmark of left.
Liberalism =/= liberal-conservatism.