Criminal insanity is fine and all when the system works, but if he stops taking his meds and kills someone again he should be held accountable for that decision and the consequences as a sane person. It's like a person drinking and getting behind the wheel of a car and commiting vehicular manslaughter. I would also have him go to a psychiatrist peroidically to help him sort out through issues that may come up on top of the medication he is recieving.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2017-02-16 at 07:02 AM.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
And this is why the death penalty for murderers should be mandatory.
If someone murders me i dont give a flying crap what mental disorder they had, they deserve the death penalty for doing it.
Otherwise it should be legal to murder anyone with a mental disorder you deem as a threat to defend yourself.
Pick one.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
Right. And his condition is not curable, meaning he'll need medicine for the rest of his life. Unlike a bipolar disorder, however, when he goes off meds (which a large percentage of schizophrenics often do), he doesn't just end up in a hospital, people end up dying. I'm not saying lock him up. I'm saying continue supervised medication. I don't think that's unreasonable given his condition and what he's been shown capable of when off medication.
This is wrong. It means you get medical treatment. The only time you'd get committed to an institution is if it's determined you're a potential threat. A psychotic break caused by trauma, for instance, isn't necessarily going to repeat itself.
And if you ARE so committed, just like as would happen if you HADN'T done something terrible, you're released when your doctors think you're safe and fit to re-enter society. It isn't a punishment. It's treatment.
Saying he did not commit a crime doesn't mean he didn't do something wrong. The way you are spinning it is like the law pretty much condones what he did because he's viewed as insane. What he did was still extremely violent and heinous whether he was in his right mind or not. People have every right and reason to be extremely wary of the gov't simply allowing him free rein with no mandate to continue taking medication.