They are more likely to leave comments or articles that are easily misunderstood on purpose. The media holds a lot of power now a days, and many of them see journalism as business.
As the saying goes:
"If you don't follow the media, you are uninformed, if you follow the media, you are misinformed".
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I just googled adam86shadow pewdiepie and you knew about him back in 2015, in fact you alluded to watching his videos in the comments
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...tually-die-out
you also asked another question "What's GlobalCitizen Festival exactly?" so others could google it for you.....
You seem to ask a lot of basic I could google them myself question for internet post points.
Last edited by infinit; 2017-02-18 at 05:44 PM. Reason: Quoted the wrong post
Just like I'm sure Info Wars and Alex Jones are asking the important questions. You know, the person who seems to think that the 'Globalist Elites' are planning on taking over and murdering most of the population. Bannon is better, but only marginally. He's still essentially an anarchist who wants to tear down the system and let 'the natural order' rise from the ashes.
I really don't understand it, Jedi Batman. I especially don't understand the sudden 180 over these past couple of years against the media. No one claims the media is perfect, and in fact a lot of us have been shaming them for their fear-mongering, but at the same time they have a considerably better, longer track record than Trump or any of his people, and have reported on the truth enough to build up good will.
I never claimed I didn't know PewDePie but your post is an example of a horrible trend of people getting uppity about people asking questions... Questions and answers are an important aspect of social communication, dismissing every question with "Google it" shows a lack of social skill or interest in conversation.
That's exactly my point. If you know you don't know anything about a subject don't try to act like you're a fucking expert. It's a waste of everyone's time and energy.
When I wander into a topic I have no clue about, I usually say something along the lines of, "I don't know enough about x to make an informed comment about it." Then, if I don't care at all about the subject I just drop it there, or if I do care I ask the person I'm talking with to explain abc so I can come away better informed.
Not everything has to be a competition where you're trying to win points.
These people see what they want to see. Yes, we've been shaming the media for their shams and fumbles. Numerous polls have shown that liberals are extremely skeptical of left wing news sources, and will often not take them at face value, needing either sourcing or multiple sources to back it up to show belief. Meanwhile on the other side of the coin we have these same polls showing that conservatives were willing to trust and believe their news outlets without further investigation, without further proof, without "questioning" the very nature of the article or its contents.
And then these same people come in, supporting Trump, and claim that we're all slaves to the main stream media... while themselves basically believing anything that comes out of Breitbart.
It would be cute, it would be endearing in just how idiotic and hypocritical it was...
If it wasn't affecting national policy and millions of people's lives.
The fact that they unironically come in here and do the EXACT SAME THINGS THAT THEY'RE ACCUSING OTHERS OF DOING would be endearing, if it weren't so frightening. Frightening, again, because it's affecting policy over millions of people.
Last edited by Cthulhu 2020; 2017-02-18 at 05:58 PM.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I don't watch Pewdiepie and WSJ is not one of my news sources. I freely admit most media has bias, which is why I tend to rely on several but there are very few mainstream that I would out right claim prints out false news.
So why don't you walk me through through the Pewdiepie debacle and tell me where it goes wrong.
The story seems to be as follows, WSJ produced an article showing Pewdiepie had made a few videos with some very pointed anti semitic content, and even went as far as paying people to hold up anti semitic signs and film themselves, which he also included in his videos.
As a result of the article, Pewdiepie lost quite a bit of the commercial partnerships he has gathered. Pewdiepie then makes another video that both apologizes for his anti semitic content, and at the same time attacking the media, especially WSJ, as having an agenda against him and for missing the context of the video.
So as someone who does not watch Pewdiepie nor reads WSJ, give me some context in which these anti-Semitic videos, which obviously were made, were taken out of context?
I'm honestly curious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDkvGT_mNd4
To CNN's credit, they apologized for it, but at the same time they only did so after getting caught. I'll leave you to make judgments about that.
For the record, I'm not affiliated with this youtube channel or with the channel that they pulled the clip from. Once again, I found this with my google fu.
As a warrior, one of our most crucial tasks is... protection. We are the shield of the Horde, and we keep our weaker brethren safe. If you are to join in our ranks, then you must prove your mettle to me. -Veteran Uzzek
Calling the media class an enemy of the people is not exactly wrong. Maybe not in an American context, but say in Britain that would actually be a very apt statement.
In America its fuzzy, but in general the media as a class are acting as a specific political party with specific collective political interests.
Most of the media objectively dislikes the election results and the population that voted for Donald Trump, similarly most if not nearly ALL of the media in Britain is aghast at the public's vote for Brexit.
This partly because the media in general is typically drawn from a similar class of people with similar ideas and ideologies.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
There is nothing social about sitting in front of a computer and asking a basic question you already knew the answer to, or even if you did not know, could spend five seconds looking up.
you learn how look things up in school as the teachers will not answer every elementary question.
Well, that is what Trump does, if I understood him correctly at that news conference. However, there is a big difference between lying and slanting. Slanting is what MSM (on both sides) has always done and will continue to do. Outright lying is magnitudes worse and should elect rightful anger. That is why it is such a big deal that Trump is calling slanted media fake and fabricated.
Because when you can't outright ban freedom of speech, the next best thing you can do is work to make sure no one trusts it.
My daughter's in her teens now, and if the channel isn't about snakes, reptiles, and/or MMA, she doesn't give two fucks. Nor do I. Pewdiepie isn't on my recommended channels list, and the fucker has never come up in conversation of which I am involved.
That being said, a simple Google search has given me the information I would require to contribute to that particular subject matter further. But again, zero fucks.
Last edited by King Shark; 2017-02-18 at 06:25 PM.
9 out of 10 people agree that in a room full of 10 people one person will always disagree with the other 9.