Since we are on the topic of virtue signalling

[PosPosPos]

Would conservatives each adopt at least one child borne out of unwanted pregnancies if Trump successfully illegalizes abortions?

Fair's fair after all, since the far righters are complaining liberals don't walk the talk on refugees.

[Barnabas]

Can you just stop having babies you don't want?

[sachinsadhukha]

Don't bring babies!

[Theinquisition]

Or people could...you know...use protection

[Super Kami Dende]

Would conservatives each adopt at least one child borne out of unwanted pregnancies if Trump successfully illegalizes abortions?

Fair's fair after all, since the far righters are complaining liberals don't walk the talk on refugees.

I'm pro-choice and even I think that is a stupid comparison.

[Sharkconas]

Would conservatives each adopt at least one child borne out of unwanted pregnancies if Trump successfully illegalizes abortions?

Fair's fair after all, since the far righters are complaining liberals don't walk the talk on refugees.

They wouldn't, hell I wouldn't and I lean liberal. But at least I'm being honest #novirtuesignalling lol.

[zoomgpally]

I'm pro-choice and even I think that is a stupid comparison.

How is it different from expecting everyone pro-immigration to accept strangers into their homes?

[Wyrt]

Or people could...you know...use protection

Republicans could also not start stupid wars that destabilize entire regions of the world and cause a massive refugee crisis, but you know...

[Super Kami Dende]

How is it different from expecting everyone pro-immigration to accept strangers into their homes?

Because you can use contraceptives to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Yet if you want to prevent refugees you are a "bigot, racist" etc etc etc.

[PosPosPos]

I'm pro-choice and even I think that is a stupid comparison.

Why is it a stupid comparison? In both cases, one party expects the other to fulfil an obligation just because the latter supports it.

- - - Updated - - -

Because you can use contraceptives to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Yet if you want to prevent refugees you are a "bigot, racist" etc etc etc.

Oh, but conservatives can also choose to not start wars in the middle east for oil thinly veiled under the pretext of liberating people from tyranny.

[Super Kami Dende]

Why is it a stupid comparison? In both cases, one party expects the other to fulfil an obligation just because the latter supports it.

Tell me how conservatives can prevent Refugees with a 99% accuracy and your comparison would be legitimate.

- - - Updated - - -

Oh, but conservatives can also choose to not start wars in the middle east for oil thinly veiled under the pretext of liberating people from tyranny.

Conservatives like Obama which didn't stop said "wars"?

[PosPosPos]

Republicans could also not start stupid wars that destabilize entire regions of the world and cause a massive refugee crisis, but you know...

Don't worry, they will next blame liberals for brainwashing a Republican president into starting the war in the middle east.

[Super Kami Dende]

Don't worry, they will next blame liberals for brainwashing a Republican president into starting the war in the middle east.

Don't worry, they will blame conservatives next for a Democrat being in power for 8 years and doing nothing to stop said Wars.

[PosPosPos]

Tell me how conservatives can prevent Refugees with a 99% accuracy and your comparison would be legitimate.

Because there's no need to? Conservatives hate middle eastern refugees, not those that come from other places.

Conservatives like Obama which didn't stop said "wars"?

If you prematurely end wars without leaving behind a stable government, you get groups like ISIS popping up to take advantage of the power vacuum. Unlike childish conservative group-think, it's never just a simple case of pulling out the troops.

- - - Updated - - -

Don't worry, they will blame conservatives next for a Democrat being in power for 8 years and doing nothing to stop said Wars.

Spoken like a true conservative without any inkling of cause and effect.

[Anevers]

Would conservatives each adopt at least one child borne out of unwanted pregnancies if Trump successfully illegalizes abortions?

Fair's fair after all, since the far righters are complaining liberals don't walk the talk on refugees.

This is great, I just thinking about this after reading that other thread.

[Liftbrul]

How is it different from expecting everyone pro-immigration to accept strangers into their homes?

I think this argument is borne from a movement in Europe during the beginning of the immigrant crisis when a lot of people supposedly offered to house the immigrants, from average people to politicians.

[Mayhem]

Or people could...you know...use protection

Don't bring babies!

Can you just stop having babies you don't want?

Rape is a thing in this world, you know that?

[Super Kami Dende]

Rape is a thing in this world, you know that?

the % of unwanted pregnancies that are a result of Rape are incredibly small compared to that of Unwanted pregnancies due to useless people not using protection, thus still making the comparison stupid.

- - - Updated - - -

Newsflash, you can still get pregnant while using protection and on birth control.

Generally because idiots use it incorrectly.

[PosPosPos]

the % of unwanted pregnancies that are a result of Rape are incredibly small compared to that of Unwanted pregnancies due to useless people not using protection, thus still making the comparison stupid.

Except it was the choice of republicans to start the war in the middle east, leading to a refugee crisis.

[Super Kami Dende]

Spoken like a true conservative without any inkling of cause and effect.

I'm not even a conservative, I'm just not retarded enough to think your proposition makes any logical sense.

- - - Updated - - -

Except it was the choice of republicans to start the war in the middle east, leading to a refugee crisis.

Actually it was the choice of both Liberals and Republicans in a Senate. Nice try though Kiddo.

- - - Updated - - -

I think it's a pretty good comparison. One of their biggest arguments is that someone will want that "child" you're wanting to abort. So why not them? It's the exact same argument some of those very same people use about refugees. "If liberals want them then they can live with liberals!"

If we let Abortion be legal, can we abort unwanted refugees from our Countries? I mean, if we are using comparisons and all, your answer would be Yes correct?