There is a Night Elf anointed as a Paladin during its events, one Delas Moonfang. The occurrence is definitely reminiscent of the inclusion of Tauren as Paladin with Aponi Brightmane.
There is a Night Elf anointed as a Paladin during its events, one Delas Moonfang. The occurrence is definitely reminiscent of the inclusion of Tauren as Paladin with Aponi Brightmane.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
This thread feels quite unnecessary. The subject was widely discussed from this page on, in the previous 7.2 spoilers thread. It would have had more sense posting there rather than open a new thread.
Can't we just leave Ner'zhul in the past? I get that many players disliked how he was dealt with in the book, but Blizz was right saying that he had to go because Arthas was the ultimate protagonist of the scourge story.
Bolvar becoming evil is definitely more interesting than "Ner'zhul is back and is controlling him". Bolvar has all the required stuff to become a major figure in WoW: former paladin, former Stormwind reagent, infused (?) with red dragonflight magic, iron will that even Arthas couldn't break, and self proclaimed jailor of the damned. And now he's doing shady business with the deathlord and Acherus.
The success of this formula can be already seen in this (and other) forums, since players speculation and hype is mostly directed towards Bolvar and the void/N'zoth.
Its all does not explain why/how he is becoming evil, and what does it have to do with void lords. He was acting similary to arthas just a bit more subtle. trying to control minds, resurrecting the dead and we see that his actions are made against the legion like he has some personal buisenes with them.
We cant throw away ner'zul... again, the visions, forseeing things, it was all ner'zuls tricks way before the helm of damnation.
I didn't mean Bolvar and the voidlords are related, just that both subject are at the center of the community attention.
Also, Ner'zhul is dead and it has been confirmed. We can assume that despite he's no longer in the helm his powers remained in the Crown, thus giving Bolvar occasional visions.
One thing that stuck out to me rather pointedly in the 7.2 Death Knight Order Hall quests is that Bolvar says "The Helm of Domination shows me many thing." The subject/object agreement of that sentence was not lost on me - it makes it sound more like Bolvar is enthralled by the Helm than the other way around (e.g. "The Helm of Domination enhances my sight" or "With the Helm of Domination I am afforded greater vision.") It adds more fuel to the argument that *something* about the Helm is influencing him especially as his new personality is pretty starkly different from his previous incarnation.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Maybe I didn't express my self clearly enough. I'm sure the lore nerds of this forum didn't expect him to be evil, but the majority of the player base just see Lich king = evil. Therefore you get an evil Lich king as expected. Blizzard lore writing isn't exactly complicated or coherent. Not after WC3 anyway.
As I said in the other thread, the Lich King's behavior and actions seem Old God'ish to me. Not the kind of Old God-stuff we'd see from a faceless maybe, more along the 'create strife and suffering'-lines.
I know you can see that if you are on the "Old God-train" like me and not see it, if you're not.
To me the lines from the Memory of Arthas in Val'Sharah, when you get your artifact power from it sealed my bet on Old God shenanigans:
Memory of Arthas whispers: The darkness does not die, <name>.
Memory of Arthas whispers: Rage Against the Nightmare. Struggle as you will.
Memory of Arthas whispers: The infinite darkness is patient. We will all be claimed in the end.
But mainly I hope they do something with it. The biggest let down for me would be, if nothing at all comes out of it and Bolvar just goes back to being silent and nothing comes from the DK nasty stuff-side.
Bolvar could only fit the role of quest boss. Raid final boss lol no. Expansion major villan. No fucking chance ever
And who is th e 7.3 finale boss? Jaraxxus?
Sargeras is dting because you cant d4ive a story with Sargeras and no legio . If hea not dead he becomes the void lords dark titan.
Convinently legion pushes azshara and nzoth the two last villans and not surprisingly the void lords two most powerful and last servants on azeroth.
Fucki ng bolvar expansion. What a fucki ng joke. Making bolvar a expansion villan after arthas is like making Jaraxxus the leader when KJ dies. Bolvars is a fucki ng nobody compared to arthas. We have fought the lich king. We dont need to fight a shitty B version of the Lich King. No thanks
This thread needs to return to its original topic or I will definitely begin cleaning it up.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Hoping they tie it all up by the end of the expansion, because I sure as hell don't want a WotLK 2.0.
Take a break from politics once in awhile, it's good for you.
It is on topic you think he wont die because of a reason you dont have and that they will milk the Lich King B team expansion concept. Thats on topic because you apparently believe in the power of the player DKs as an enemy faction
Now give me your reasoning or you shouldnt of even.made the damn argument.
- - - Updated - - -
They will for the simple fact these questlines need a finale to them all. None have hit a climax yet.
Im more concerned about the priest old god blade and the ramifications of slaying Sargeras with it. Could the blade itself pierce deep and cause unforseen consequences such as the birth of the Dark Titan ironically from the one that destroyed the universe in opposition of its creation
Infracted.
Last edited by Aucald; 2017-02-28 at 12:51 AM. Reason: Received Infraction
We can't really say what Blizz has planned for Bolvar right now...they can make him into a sideboss, they could give him a power update (maybe he creates a new, more powerful Frostmourne or whatever) and make him into a new major expansion boss, etc. It's completey up to Blizz right now
IMO, Bolvar won't do much outside of what he is currently doing so long as the player DK upholds their end of the bargain. He's necessary for the plot, to keep the Scourge in check. While he strongly suggests that if the Deathlord falls, he will take matters into his own hands, the fact that the Deathlord won't fall thanks to plot armor, I doubt anything will truly change.
You could HOWEVER. The entire dk story is class specific so bolvar out of nowhere for 90% of the playerbase would be a nonsensical stupid curveball.
Lastly i doubt KJ holds the same grudge he held for nerzhul and arthas betrayal that he would for bolvar. Bolvar is irrelevant to KJ. Absolutely pathetic
- - - Updated - - -
And if a move was made against the deathlord by bolvar it would be the dk class hall to deal with. NOT global player content.