Smith and Wesson or Henry rifles
browning automatic rifle.
r.i.p. alleria. 1997-2017. blizzard ruined alleria forever. blizz assassinated alleria's character and appearance.
i will never forgive you for this blizzard.
They call these "pumpkin slingers" around here, it's a felony just to have one in your possession. It's also the most intimidating thing in the world to have pointed at you.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
By "used" if you mean by a bunch of people stuck on nostalgia unable to *Elsa Voice* Let it goooooo, then you would be correct.
Its use in military or police (or even private security) applications is about zero. Out dated design and low round capacity pretty much did that.
Its pretty funny when people buy these high dollar $3000 Wilson Combat 1911's then need to "break it in" to get it to feed and function with reliability.
Meanwhile, a plastic brick known as Glock comes straight out the box wooping ass with even the most cheap ammo.
637s became razor blades years ago though.
- - - Updated - - -
The USMC still prefers it over the M9.
The M1991 (cheapest Colt made 1911) I owned had no issues feeding 230gr FMJs right out of the box, which is the round it was designed for.
Funnily enough I only have a Glock 20. Which is a European made pistol.
I was at the gun shop the other day and my dealer was talking about getting some new Henry that has original loading mechanism and blah blah blah. $1700+
I had a Marlin 1894, 44, sold it when bills came in and can't find another for a good price. Was a lot of fun and I miss it.
"I only feel two things Gary, nothing, and nothingness."
The capacity is the main handicap for a modern officer I'd think, function wise the only downside is the perception that somehow a cocked hammer is less safe than an internal firing pin, when both require a 5lb pull to discharge, without modifications.
Generally you don't need to break in a Wilson, though a Les Baer might need 500 rounds before you can comfortably rack the slide. I always preferred Ed Brown and Rock River, myself. The slide/frame has no resistance and no side-to-side play, very well done. I just stick with Colt though, so not for me.Its pretty funny when people buy these high dollar $3000 Wilson Combat 1911's then need to "break it in" to get it to feed and function with reliability.
Of course, comparing a $500 glock to a $800 Colt 1991 would be more accurate, neither will need breaking in and both should feed anything. There are high dollar Glocks on the market, and I don't think you gain much for it.
Don't get too cheap though. When a Glock blows up, all that energy just wrecks the guns. A 1911 directs the energy much better with a kaboom. And that polygonal rifling really hates lead buildup.Meanwhile, a plastic brick known as Glock comes straight out the box wooping ass with even the most cheap ammo.
"I only feel two things Gary, nothing, and nothingness."
A timeless classic, truely a masterpiece of craftmanship.
PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
BLUE LIVES MATTER
NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
/s
And this thread America, is why everyone hates you.
Revolver. Esp. the Smith & Wesson .38 special. Model 10. So reliable and many still function perfectly even today after decades of service. Rugar Blackhawk .357 Mag, is another one I like.
- - - Updated - - -
Everyone as in non Americans? If so, we do not care. They usually call us for help if they get invaded.
The 357 magnum can also fire 38 specials, which is nice for target practice because they are cheap.