MSNBC has Trump's Tax Returns. (Will show them at 9PM EST)

[Wells]

https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/st...12345185046528
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/st...99616324255745

I see Julian is feeling out of the spotlight today.

[Deleted]

And? He lies on a daily basis. His position does not allow him to create reality, regardless of how much he wishes it did.

Many people lie on a daily basis. Hillary Clinton lied on a secondly basis during her election campaign

[StayTuned]

Well this should be interesting.

It would be nothing short of a civil war.

Mid-America vs. Coastal America. A peaceful way of getting rid of Trump would be him resigning.

[Boreaz]

Wait...now she's saying what they have is from 2005? Hmmmm

[Wells]

Many people lie on a daily basis. Hillary Clinton lied on a secondly basis during her election campaign

Clinton isn't president dude. Get a new fucking excuse.

[Deleted]

I was referring to Trump stating he isn't taking his salary, you know, the important part of the conversation.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39264663

he even donates the money. What a great man giving his salary to the less fortunate. One does have to respect helping the poor. Well atleast I do

[HumbleDuck]

Pick a talking point dude.

I'm predicting the response.
Just like the leaks that were obtained through illegal means while being fake.

[Sky High]

I also feel like it's a pretty bad idea for MSNBC to be the one that shows them if they actually do have them. Trump supporters and really moderates could just dismiss MSNBC as biased. They should hand them off to Reuters or the AP if they really want the information out there and not just ratings.

which news organization do you think is better suited for this? I mean I doubt we wont hear FAKE NEWS regardless who presents it. except maybe Fox news.

[cubby]

So you say I should look for new sources, but you don't want to share where you get your information.

That is not very nice of you, but I have to respect your decision.

If you're serious, start with:

New York Times
New York Post
The Washington Post
The Economist
The Christian Science Monitor
The BBC

And then pick the 10 biggest cities in the United States, from there pick five of them randomly, and read those city's top circulated newspaper.

[Deleted]

Clinton isn't president dude. Get a new fucking excuse.

rightfully so

- - - Updated - - -

If you're serious, start with:

New York Times
New York Post
The Washington Post
The Economist
The Christian Science Monitor
The BBC

And then pick the 10 biggest cities in the United States, from there pick five of them randomly, and read those city's top circulated newspaper.

Thank you I will look into those, though I have already had a couple of those in my bookmarks!

[Beazy]

oHHHhhhhHHhhh Hes going to be so mad!!!!!! Hes so fucked!

[cubby]

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39264663

he even donates the money. What a great man giving his salary to the less fortunate. One does have to respect helping the poor. Well atleast I do

He says he will, but he hasn't yet. Key difference.

[CostinR]

This should be good.

[cubby]

Wait...now she's saying what they have is from 2005? Hmmmm

That's pretty old . . . . Shoot.

[Deleted]

He says he will, but he hasn't yet. Key difference.

He has just been president for a few weeks and he has a lot on his plate bringing the country back to its former glory.

He openly said he is going to donate it and I believe him!

[alexw]

I also feel like it's a pretty bad idea for MSNBC to be the one that shows them if they actually do have them. Trump supporters and really moderates could just dismiss MSNBC as biased. They should hand them off to Reuters or the AP if they really want the information out there and not just ratings.

They will get passed around. MSNBC got them first so they will do the exclusives first but after that everyone will get their hands on them. They will be pretty complex documents so are going to take a lot of digging into, and that requires the resources of more than just MSNBC to do,

[Sky High]

I don't want to be rude, but i said which ones in the comment you are replying to. I have to assume you just didn't read it.

I noticed, the last bit didn't appear until after I posted it for some weird reason.

[Thepersona]

This should be good.

indeed, but they have the 2005's tax returns, what we can expect to see from them?

[Vanyali]

You lost me there, buddy.

how dare you imply that it's a tabloi-- i mean, it's a perfectly reasonable source. please reconsider dragon jesus!

[callipygoustp]

So you say I should look for new sources, but you don't want to share where you get your information.

That is not very nice of you, but I have to respect your decision.

So judgemental over such a petty thing.