You don't know they're desperate. We don't know that. All we have is their word of mouth. I also won't comment on what makes illiterate hairy brownies gang up on leaky dinghies, or sink their own leaky little dinghies at the first sign of someone else picking up and fixing their shit.
All I'm going to say that if you can't see the writing on the wall you're going to be thrown to the wolves when these people start causing havoc. We're not going to take kindly the useful idiots of yesteryear.
Okay what? You said that we should decline their applications if we don't consider them to be refugees. We did. The issue is not us, but commies babbling about "solidarity" and "sanctions" even though we didn't break a single fucking rule. It's the EU that's breaking the rules, not us.
We have some experience with this bullying, believe me. When we said "no" to Greek bailout they were babbling again, because that's all these incompetent clowns can do. Our government collapsed because of it. And again it was the EU breaking the rules, NOT US. So, to the EU - fuck off with solidarity and some other made-up shit. We didn't sign up for YOUR solidarity. We didn't agree with bailing out GERMAN banks and we won't solve GERMAN problems now.
And EU would be wrong which has been said numerous times in an abundance of articles during 2015-2016 if you just bothered to look it up. And before you complain that "EU have said it is safe" EU said it was safe because they needed help to take care of the refugees they could not take themselves so they asked Turkey to shelter them according to international law. And you know since Turkey probably said "yes we will" and there was a timesensitive issue they said it was safe. When human rights organisations and help organisations have been onsite in Turkey they have seen that this is not the case. I mean when Greece sent back refugees they could not recieve Turkey had place for 200k people and they had millions of refugees! You think that makes it safe?
Well that's what I mean by "appropairate investments". Basically throwing around money is not going to produce results. And I agree that more personel would be part of the path forward for managing the situation.
Other things I would include are policy based around language, benefits, locations, resettlement back home in secured areas etc to ensure that those coming across are in serious need to do so rather than those taking do so for convenience. Because I honestly feel like quite a few are simply jumping ship because it's easier rather than they down right need to.
In essence with some serious and followed through commitments, I believe the EU could do an effective job of stopping the influx and managing those who the EU deems to be in genuine need.
Well, I simplified and might have missed some of the development - but I don't see how that changes it significantly.
The eastern route wasn't blocked immediately when Hungary began erecting fences in July - and the treaty-suspension can still have acted as a pull-factor - even if it only were for Syrians.
However, the main point is that both Germany and Hungary now have border controls - and Germany and Greece are following Dublin - thus making a repeat of 2015 unlikely even if Erdogan tries to open the flood of refugees.
It wouldn't be hard to find a country refusing the so called "refugees" and forced quotas. There's like 4 of them in Europe in total.
And it would be even easier to find a country whose government collapsed because it refused to support Greek bailout.
So, Slovakia. Have fun, not sure what you're going to do with it.
So i have yet to find anything relating the rejection of applicants who aren´t considered refugees. This isn´t about the ~800 refugees that should´ve been relocated to slovakia, right?
Anyway, the NO vote in your parlament caused the collapse of your government, nothing to do with the EU, furthermore, slovakia was a full member of EFSF since dez. 2010 roughly a year prior to the bail-out of greece and other countries (!!). I mean, you become a member of an institution and then don´t want to follow what they do? And the ECJ ruled on this and the EU did not break any rules.