That's probably the most retarded statement and generalization I've read today. You are seriously trying to prove a point by providing anecdotal evidence and generalizing how males and females experiment sexuality based only on sex and nothing else?
In the hypothetical case that the kid in this case was forced to eat her pussy to get a passing grade, it's okay because the teacher thought of all of this shit as a very emotional relationship. What the actual fuck.
This is really baffling, I'm starting to understand the widespread hate towards millennials. Oh well... I guess we can just say...
"The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it's indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference."
Elie Wiesel (1928 – 2016)
She's smiling because she knows women sex offenders usually get a slap on the wrist compared to men.
I'm with the law on this, don't care if the kid is 17, no sexual relationship should exist in a school between a teacher and a student, it breaks so many moral issues ( and im not necessary talking about only the kids mental state, but also the other favors the teacher could have been doing, such as fixing grades, etc)
Yes, that's correct. I'm generalizing male and female sexuality because they're actually quite different from each other. That's why we have these "stereotypes".
Sure it's possible that she was forcing him to eat her pussy or else she was going to give him bad grades. But do you really think that's what was happening? I'd give it a 5% chance at best. If it was a male teacher having sexual relations with a female student well then the chances of such a thing are probably 25% or higher. Now of course I'm just guessing without any sources, but I'm probably in the ballpark.
Generally speaking men rape women. Women don't really rape men. For every 100 cases of rape I'd say maybe 3 at most are cases of women raping men. The other 97 are going to be men raping women or men raping other men.
Random chick comes up to a random dude and says, "Wanna fuck?". What percentage of guys do you think will say yes?
Random dude comes up to a random chick and says, "Wanna fuck?". What percentage of girls do you think will say yes?
It's common sense. Not sure why you're so surprised that men and women are different.
Last edited by Docturphil; 2017-03-22 at 05:02 PM.
lol.. at 17, i think i would have been the guilty party if caught with a teacher... there was one I may have done anything to get in the sack, and yeah, can be very charming and persuasive too..
I think in the UK the legal age of consent is 16, but it is still frowned upon if you're in your twenties and they are 16/17. I was a very mature guy at 16, but some of my friends, were children, they would definitely have qualified as been prayed upon if a teacher or older person allowed their sexual feelings to develop into something -- even a hint of coercion should not be tolerated. Toleration is not acceptable for everything
This isn't just my perception of reality though. It's just generally how things are.
Do you really need a scientific study to tell you this shit? I'm not going to try and prove anything because this shit should be a no brainer. Wake up and smell the coffee beans.
Let's be real, this 17 year old male was in heaven. Best class he's ever had.
Have to be honest,
This is the only time I don't think double standards should be a thing, I think (not saying all the time) when theres a age gap this big and the tutor is a male and the student a female, I do believe it has a massive effect on a woman, more so than that of a man.
He'll be sat there, with his mates in a park with a can of beer having a laugh about it, he'll be gutted he won't be getting any more from her, and probably slighty upset over the whole thing, but that'll pass. For me, a woman has the potential for it to be a bigger thing that it actually is.
I kinda need a shovel because this is coming out far worse than I mean it to.
Nah you're right. People don't like to hear it because it can be perceived as contradictory to their whole "men and women are equal" thing. Which, by the way, I totally agree with. But the plain fact is men and women are different and this double standard is one of the results of that difference. Just how it is.
People trying to suggest we need a scientific study to prove it though is just fucking hilarious. Yeah, sure you go ahead with your scientific study. I'll just sit here and wait for however many years it takes to reach your conclusion. You'll come up to me with your conclusion and I'll be like, "NO FUCKING SHIT. Can't believe you actually wasted your time on that."
Man, all my teachers were male or 65+ females, and one butch dyke that was around 50. I think one time we had a sub that was mid twenties to 30, who was somewhat attractive. Where was all the eye candy teachers back in the day? These damn kids always gettin spoiled
You missed the * at the end
*if you are a woman you will probably receive 75-100% reduction in the sentence, and half the time won't even have to be put on the sex offender list.
I also like how everyone says the kid was in heaven.
Do you think young female students can't also be in "heaven" when having sex with a hot male teacher?
Last edited by Zan15; 2017-03-22 at 06:17 PM.
If the age of consent is 17, and that is the age of the boy, then no jail time is required.
Though she should be fired for breaking the code of conduct.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.