What? Snowflakes?
If you go for a interview not knowing what the company does, you're an idiot,
If you apply for someone where without the proper qualification or experience or with nothing releated to said business, then you're not getting in,
This isn't someone being a snowflake, this is people being stupid
What's the correct answer to the gun question? I can't tell.
Whining that 'those people' want to take ur guns or whining that we don't want other people to have any guns?
Good way to weed out the millennials that will just complain the whole time they're there.
Kom graun, oso na graun op. Kom folau, oso na gyon op.
#IStandWithGinaCarano
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
You forgot to answer "Why did you cry?". It all comes down to how you formulate yourself. If you answer in a way that fit their requirement routine then great, you passed, if you don't, then you didn't.
They would not need this kind of thing if they had a handful of applications but they do not, they have too many to handle. It doesn't matter if the test is great or horrible as long as it lowers the amount of applications and that some of those applications is good.
As someone who has participated in recruiting, I can say that there's a lot of things that can appear very offputting to hireing someone, as long as he isn't asking questions like "Which party do you consider yourself an affiliate to", there's, in my opinion nothing wrong with his questions.
It's his company and his money that is on the line.
If they stick with their definition of Snowflake, the answer do not matter, it's how you defend that is important. You can be for or against gun control (in the example) , if you cannot back that answer with a coherent explanation, I agree, you might be whiny and unproductive.
Same with political believe, as long as they judge the explanation and not the answer, I'm all for it.
MMO-Champion, once the place to get WoW News, now the home of the haters and their clickbait and doomsaying threads
Yeah, it is interesting what people will admit to in interviews.
I found behavior interviews to be a piece of cake (basically asking you to describe a time in the past where, for example, you had a conflict at the workplace and how did you handle it), but, doing those interviews myself now, I'm blown away by how easy it is to catch people describing bad behavior while trying to rationalize that it was actually good behavior on their part. The technique is pretty easy and works extremely well.
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
You cried "when your mother passed away" cool, and "why did you cry"? Was it because you were sad that she's gone? Happy? Tears of relief that her pain finally was over? Was it tears of anger? Did you only cry because everyone else did and you thought that was how you should act?
Nothing personal. Your answer just makes my questions sound so damn harsh...