Here is a good article with many different sources regarding the reasons a woman would have an abortion: http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/poli...abreasons.html
Less than 1% of abortions were because of incest/rape. Most common were unreadiness, social stigma, and financial reasons.
It is Eugenics. Planned Parenthood was founded by a woman named Margaret Sanger. It isn't unreasonable to argue that the pro-choice movement is also a Eugenicists' movement.
- - - Updated - - -
Another great example of leftists and eugenics.
Down Syndrome isn't what they typically consider a major abnormality. I'm talking about situations where the kids are born with under-developed organs, or their heart out of their chest, or a dozen other messed up things that just involve bringing a dying, suffering, or struggling infant into the world with very little guarantee of their continued existence. All this does is force them to be in physical pain and distress and their parents to be in emotional pain as the life they were unwilling to bring into this world falls apart in front of them.
- - - Updated - - -
I mean, kind of? He got her pregnant without her permission, so...
Women don't need a reason to get an abortion in western society. It doesn't matter if the child has a major or minor abnormality, and more often than not the child is perfectly healthy when they give the abortion. (http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/poli...abreasons.html) So lets not try to mask this pro-choice argument in rhetoric that we are ultimately doing what's best for the child. It's ultimately about the parent not wanting to take responsibility or accountability for their life choices.
- - - Updated - - -
It's reasonable to assume that planned parenthood has/had similar goals to Margaret Sanger. At the very least it would be a cause for concern that your founder was a racist and a eugenicist. Hitler was likely influenced by Margaret Sanger as she came well before the Third Reich in Germany.
No woman should be forced to bear the child of her rapist. That's fucking terrible. "We don't know much about the kid except that half of his genes came from the man who raped you". Sounds terrific. Lawmaker seems to have uncovered part of the hypocrisy of religion but not all of it (as has been laid out by other people here) and his peers seem uncomfortable with what he is saying (that God essentially willed or allowed the rape to occur).
That said idk wtf is up with these lawmakers in OK. Everything I hear out of there is awful. Getting a tattoo wasn't even legal there until ~mid 00s I believe.
Agree 100%. Its even worse when they're specifically including genetic abnormalities as a consequence of incestuous rape.
Oddly enough, even though I disagree with his conclusion (namely: the whole @!#$ing bill), I don't disagree with the reasoning.
For a monotheistic faith, you have to accept the paradoxical nature that good & bad events both come from a singular divine will.
My conclusion though, would be that the test of faith would be on the person going through the trials, and NOT on anyone else to force their preconceived notions of what the right course of action should be. If the rape victim feels she's strong enough to bear and raise the child, then so be it. If not, that as well. Only a demon would shame & blame someone placed into a choice like that.
Worst part about it though, is that I'm sure there's a few politicians that voted for this not out of any personal morality, but because they did it out of professional self-interest. I have more respect for the idealist that feels he's doing whats right, then for the pragmatist that feels he'll get the most benefit from this, right or wrong.
Now we are comparing apples to oranges. Planned Parenthood is a publicly funded non-profit. It is completely tax exempt because of this. It's debatable whether Ford accepted government money in a bailout. When we were discussing the article about de-funding Planned Parenthood, you seemed to be very strongly opposed to that idea. I feel like if you support policy that finances Planned Parenthood, you should be able to form a cohesive argument about why it requires my tax dollars. Let's stay on topic here.
While I don't agree with or like his view, it's quite a natural one for a christian to have. If God is all-knowing and all-powerful, and everything is a part of his plan, then rape is a part of his plan.
I don't know why he'd be against abortion though. If the rape is god's will then surely so is the abortion the woman has afterwards...