I don't know what's more retarded. The idea in itself, or the fact that someone asks if this "could work for Western countries"... Wtf?
Although I wouldn't hold a certain country of FREEDUMZ! above instating something like this. Not only are people poor because they're lazy, but they should have to PAY for being poor in cold hard cash!!
As usual, people disregard details and the actual purpose and reasoning behind this tax. Lukashenko is more intelligent than most people believe (although he indeed is hard set in the soviet ways). He would not stay in power for the last several decades otherwise.
1. This tax affects people who have not paid taxes for the past 183 days (half a year) only. This would help tax people who are not employed officially, but get their salaries "out of an envelope", i.e. unregistered, unofficial gray workforce.
2. A person that has not paid taxes either because he is working unoficially, or living from dividends from property or capital, next year are obligated to pay something like $230 in tax. That is it, an annual pay of $230. It is not crazy amount even for Belarus. Close to a monthly salary in a government employ. We have a similar structure in business organization called "single" or "unified" tax, where you do not pay income, value added or other taxes, but pay a single sum based on your total turnover. This is very simplified of course, but it works for small businesses.
3. This law does indeed hurt the lowest income category of citizens (i.e. homeless without a job). But it is not aimed at them. I am sure that in this case amendments are going to be made if they already were not included (I am too lazy to try and translate actual law complete text, google does a shitty job at it). The primary purpose of this law is to combat gray and illegal employment. Basically illegal workers. I am sure that at least people in the US can relate, especially those who support Trump's ideas as to illegal immigrants.
The funny thing is, it does work in western countries quite nicely. You are obliged to pay taxes out of your unemployment benefits in the US last time I checked. Please explain me how is it different? I mean of course, in the US you can choose not to pay this tax by not receiving benefits at all. But that just basically means that instead of a partial amount, the government gets it all.
This law in Belarus is the same! It serves a similar purpose, while at the same time targeting gray employees. Believe it or not, but unemployment pay in Belarus was tax free until recently.
Last edited by Gaaz; 2017-03-26 at 10:02 AM.
That is "coming from abroad" :P
If you want "local" there is plenty too; like actual "owner" rather then "manager" of his property he has little patience for his managers stealing from him.
This is madness!!!
Madness???
This...
is....
Sparta!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Rudkobing; 2017-03-26 at 12:12 PM.
I wonder whats stopping you from claiming you work 90 hours a week for 1 cent with that policy.
Sigh...
These days it is less about who wants to work and who doesn't. Amount of jobs is decreasing. It will keep decreasing. This is due to technology and automation. Many jobs are simply unneccessary. Even, if you put people to do certain jobs, it would be far less efficient than putting machine do it. Therefore you can't even artificially "create jobs" since they will cost more than is gained from it.
Therefore this tax is idiotic. Its not like unemployed got money to pay this tax. More will turn to crime. I'm betting this causes more damage than it "fixes".
Perhaps in US it might be true in some places, but that wouldn't be true for Belarus - they certainly created lots of jobs there, they are just having trouble filling some of them - as well as trouble with extracting enough added value from them to pay for all their social programs without Russian "subsidies" .
In Belarus "turning to crime" in any large quantities isn't really an option, their interior ministry is quite well-funded.Therefore this tax is idiotic. Its not like unemployed got money to pay this tax. More will turn to crime. I'm betting this causes more damage than it "fixes".
And/or just implement consumption taxes. While granting that there's still some economic activity that skips surveillance, the percentage of people in first-world countries that manage to skip both standard W-2 style taxation and buy everything they get outside of businesses that would follow sales tax laws is going to be pretty low. I wouldn't really worry about it, for the most part.
You can't tax non-working people. If they get welfare, then you are basically just giving them less money. We have something similar in Germany. They'll try to get you to sign an agreement with which they can penalize you if you don't do what they want. That way they can take x% of the money you get each month, keep that for themselves and continue to intimidate and blackmail you. We even had people here commit suicide, because they were so desperate cause they were getting fucked by this corrupt system.
Belarus is basically North Korea (a bumper state between Russia/China and the evil capitalist civilized West, ruled by a standard dictator with a minuscule penis). Knowing that, you shouldn't be shocked any any of this.
Last edited by mmoc594fd2488f; 2017-03-26 at 02:52 PM.
That does not work in CIS countries. For example, I worked with a person from Russia who in effect was self employed underwater welder (gas pipelines). He was not registered as an employee in any company, and simply provides a service to pipeline owners. Since he is not a company or an employee of a company, pipeline owners can attribute his pay to their expenses, but do not have to deduce tax from it. Basically, his salary was tax free.
This is not a unique scenario. This situation is extremely widespread in that region. Anyone who is self employed basically does not pay taxes at all. And there is really very little you can do from the employer side in terms of "draconian measures". They are their own employees.
However, if you tax them directly, as a citizen, it becomes much more difficult to avoid taxation. Unless you do not deal with government structures at all (schools, hospitals etc.).
I know that it is not ideal. I know that it is based on a somewhat flawed system. But it does solve the problem at least partially. The only alternative would be scrapping entire tax codex and starting from scratch, as well as somehow making all self employed people, starting from a turnip growing grandma all the way to computer specialists (who are frequently self employed there), register their incomes (under a pinishment of what - jail time or draconian fines? Back to square one.).
So, they want to tax people for not having money...
I am both the Lady of Dusk, Vheliana Nightwing & Dark Priestess of Lust, Loreleî Legace!
~~ ~~
<3 ~ I am also the ever-enticing leader of <The Coven of Dusk Desires> on Moon Guard!