Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ...
5
6
7
8
9
... LastLast
  1. #121
    Void Lord Aeluron Lightsong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    In some Sanctuaryesque place or a Haven
    Posts
    44,683
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowraven View Post
    I don't understand why so many of you are asking for a remaster of Warcraft 3. I'd rather they make a Warcraft 4 with new lore and added units and factions.
    Warcraft 3 was great, but why not go forward instead of just reliving the past? WoD was a reliving of the past, how many of you liked that?
    It wasn't executed correctly that's the thing and Warcraft 4 is not going to be a thing for the forseeable future.
    #TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde

    Warrior-Magi

  2. #122
    The Patient
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    338
    I am so stoked for this!

  3. #123
    Deleted
    That's my Summer dissapeared

  4. #124

  5. #125
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    Am I the only one who read the last line which is "Download and play for free."?
    You read it wrong. It's about original SC/BW from 1998/1999. Not about remaster.
    the original game and the Brood War expansion, will be free to download and play.
    Last edited by Serissa; 2017-03-26 at 04:34 PM. Reason: typo
    Why you think the Net was born? Porn! Porn! Porn!

  6. #126
    Preserved gameplay, more screen space.

    Looks absolutely great. Can't wait for it!

    Only thing I'd want is an option for the old sprites.

  7. #127
    That has to be a 1st of april joke...

  8. #128
    This gives me hope for Diablo 2 remastered. Leave the core gameplay alone and just upscale the graphics. Would buy in a heartbeat.

  9. #129
    Bloodsail Admiral Xerra's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,171
    Would be funny if they made HD Diablo 2 remastered and it outsold D3

  10. #130

  11. #131
    Damn awesome, can't wait to play!

  12. #132
    Quote Originally Posted by Amerissis View Post
    I don't understand. Why would they spend resources on an old, old game, while there's already a new, better version of it? What a waste.
    SC2 is not a better version, there's a reason the game have almost completely died out.

  13. #133
    Quote Originally Posted by snackfeat View Post
    SC2 is not a better version, there's a reason the game have almost completely died out.
    It is a better version. And it hasn't died out.

  14. #134
    Quote Originally Posted by paralleluniverse View Post
    It is a better version. And it hasn't died out.
    Keep telling yourself that.

  15. #135
    Quote Originally Posted by snackfeat View Post
    SC2 is not a better version, there's a reason the game have almost completely died out.
    Only the most popular RTS game on the market. Totally ded gmae......

  16. #136
    It feels like April's fool (as Blizzard usually do). If not, I hope they at least upgraded the Unit selection tab. (More then 12 at the same time). But it just feels like recycling all over again. We need something new, something big, RPG/MMO/Adventure style.

  17. #137
    Bloodsail Admiral TheDeeGee's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,194
    Free for those who own all StarCraft 2 Collector's Editions i guess?

  18. #138
    People are this fucking dumb and give blizzard money for old games. It's all window dressing. Here's an idea why not make something new.

    I hope people are not dumb and fall for this and waste thier money.

  19. #139
    Quote Originally Posted by grexly75 View Post
    And there is the rub, games producers are in a way unwilling to try something new unlike in the past.. Because these days if it fails the amount of toxicity from the gaming community is enough that it scares any other developer from trying something innovative and interesting..

    I suppose that is also why there has been SFA of interest coming out of Hollywood, it is reboot central over there at the moment.. The funny thing is if you want to see something interesting and original in a movie your best bet is Europe and Asia..
    It comes down to cost. I'm pretty old for a gamer (born '72) and 8 bit and 16 bit games where developed by groups of 1-10 people in 6 months. Today the teams are over 100 people and cost millions and take more than one year. That's a BIG commitment and big risk. So they play it safe. I don't blame them, it's a systematic problem of the complex modern tech and I also can't offer a good solution. Indy games are one way to tackle the problem. But people also want top graphics and sound, but that's expensive and takes time...
    Atoms are liars, they make up everything!

  20. #140
    Quote Originally Posted by jarbulldog View Post
    People are this fucking dumb and give blizzard money for old games. It's all window dressing. Here's an idea why not make something new.

    I hope people are not dumb and fall for this and waste thier money.
    Who are you to decide it's a waste of other peoples money? It's their money let them do what they want with it. I won't personally if they are going to allow the older version to play with the newer one since I run it fine on Windows 10.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •