You're right that that's how moral decisions manifest on a cultural level. But that a culture makes such a moral decision does not ensure the decision's morality. On an individual level - someone can choose whether to do A or B, but simply making that choice does not ensure that the choice being made is moral, regardless of whether or not the individual believes it to be.
I get the feeling he/she is a forum chameleon, adopting values and knowledge and changing his/her narrative to fit the post rather than bringing his/her own values and thoughts. He/she is clearly too emotional.
The vast majority of humans that aren't interested in animals, are ignorant to how they function. Even among animal lovers, people stay ignorant. Many people still believe shit made up about animals by ignorant men from the 19th century despite new facts and findings being out there for all to see.
You proved my point in your own post. Quite hilarious.
Either you're ignorant, or you conveniently overlook just how common animal suffering is in the West because you have a need to view cultures as barbaric. Both are equally sad but one could at least be chalked down to lack of information and interest rather than blatant xenophobia.
How come these dogs needs saving, while the cows, chickens, and pigs on our farms does not?
In these countries, dogs does not have a history of companionship with humans, and are therefore not seen as pets. Them slaugtering dogs for human consumption is no different than us slaugtering cows got human consumption. Get some goddamn perspective people.
If you can't make this connection you are incredibly morally biased and lack the empathy.
I think it's pretty evident by now to most people in this thread what you are.
Calling it as I see it, and your entire argument in this entire thread has overlooked reality in some parts of the world whilst cracking down on reality in others, more convenient areas to your agenda.
While dog is never anything I intend to try, ever. I can't justify damning a whole culture for eating animals that are being raised for meat. I think if anything, people that are upset about this, should focus more on the animals being humanly raised and slaughtered. (I know nothing of the dog meat industry but I'm assuming, from reading this thread, that it's probably unnecessarily cruel.)
That's not to say the US doesn't have some stepping up to do in the cruelty department (Europe too), what comes to the top of my head are chicken industry in general (meat birds, hatcheries, layers),veal and foie gras.
That would fuck with ecosystems on a scale humans haven't even touched yet. Ecosystems require predators for population control and what about insects that need to feed on rotting meat or use the left overs for reproduction. Then you have animals that no longer have a predator grow out of control and this causes over consumption of plant life leading to major issues and so on. The whole " Nothing should eat meat if we can stop it" ignores how life and ecosystems that took millions of years to evolve works.
So because I don't like people eating dogs and torturing them, I'm racist because I don't see that the same way as people cooking lobsters alive. But I do, but because I'm not whining about the lobsters, I am an evil racist?
Here is the kicker. I don't hate Korean or Chinese people. Even when they torture or eat the dogs. I don't hate them because of their colour of their skin or that they are from china or Korea, I hate their culture, I hate their customs, but not the people.
That's not racism.
So basically its ok to take food off of peoples plates in Korea so we can just kill the dogs here in a kennel instead of over there for food.