For the fourth time: Go get other definitions to complement that one and give you a more comprehensive understanding of what it actually means.
You can't go and just cherry pick the first definition, off wikipedia, and then pretend it's the authorative and singular definition. Well you can, but then you just demonstrate your own ineptitude.
I would hope not. The point is, as I have said multiple times now. that "rape culture" encompasses more than just rape. It's about an attitude that leads to many forms of inappropriate sexual behaviour towards women (although the same can apply to men). But like I said, I think you need to do the reading on this topic, because clearly you have little or no knowledge of what the people who created the term meant by it, or what their plight was and (to a lesser extent today) still is.
That being said, as I understand it, if there is any country where there is no rape culture, Sweden is probably it.
What I'm saying is alcohol can negatively influence the actions of someone when at an age where sexual desires are at their height.
Increase the chance of misbehaving. Drink enough alcohol and most walls come down.
I'm talking about alcohol because the post I quoted mentioned people aged 18-24, which is college.
Where do two strangers try to get in the groove? College parties, house parties, bars... etc.
Everyone drinks alcohol.
No-one is going around and raping people in classrooms.
Edit: This is obviously true for both genders. There are many girls who go out with the plan of getting laid.
To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must prove that:
1. The defendant had sexual intercourse with a woman;
2. He and the woman were (not married/married) to each other at the time of the intercourse;
3. The effect of (a/an) (intoxicating/anesthetic/controlled) substance prevented the woman from resisting;
AND
4. The defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the effect of (a/an) (intoxicating/anesthetic/controlled) substance prevented the woman from resisting.
Sexual intercourse means any penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or genitalia by the penis. [Ejaculation is not required.]
So... women can't rape other women or men?
Actually... re-reading your link doesn't prove intoxication = rape. Literally says resisting. Striking up a conversation and convincing the girl of my sexual prowess doesn't mean I prevented her from resisting.
Last edited by Cirayne24; 2017-04-05 at 04:21 PM.
"Clearly every aspect of one's life, from financial stability to social popularity, to sexual prowess can be boiled down to 4 numbers: One's Arena rating" ~ Xandamere
W/e, I'm neither a rapist nor a defender of rapists. I don't see the point since these people are probably not going to care, but whatever. Doesn't affect me.
I have done the reading on this topic and I find it to be a ridiculous and pessimistic outlook on life. I can see some valid points in it but then again things like "Manspreading" (normal people call that men sitting comfortably when it bothers nobody else because itchy balls = bad) take away all the credence from the legitimate issues that are raised (such as the darker sides of hookup culture, especially when alcohol is involved.)
And the definitions are getting a tad too fluent for me, by the way. I've heard people arguing dozens of times now that if two drunk people have consensual sex, the man is by default the rapist if the women decides later she didn't want it.
These ridiculous moving the goal post and shifting the presumption of innocence strategies don't serve to improve anything, it just makes reasonable people sneer at the whole thing in general and dismiss it.
My 2 cents towards this.
Last edited by Magicpot; 2017-04-05 at 04:22 PM.
Google translate from politism about it:
It would seem that RAPE and NORMS relating to how victims are treated is actually pretty vital to it.The hallmark of a rape culture is that women are blamed for their own rape if they did not live up to the demands of rape culture has set on how women should protect themselves, and that men's sexuality portrayed as uncontrollable and all men as potential rapists.
Rape culture is created by a number of components that interact with each other.
- Victimblaming or focus on anything other than the perpetrator's act ( "Why she was so drunk she could not defend herself?")
- trivialization of sexual assault (very common in popular culture, see also Steubenville further down)
- Slutshaming ( "Whores can not be raped "), the indulgence of sexual abuse (" Take it as a compliment! ")
- Objectification of women and to express the view that women are in the public do not like what individuals anywhere but on men's terms and conditions (" to say to women always think about how they dress and behave to avoid being raped're no worse than telling someone to unlock the bike so it does not get stolen ")
- and a strong desire to believe in bare numbers of false rape reports ( "Many complaints are the fabricated to hide infidelity / shameful behavior that the woman regret the day after") are all important components of rape culture.
In this way, controls all women's lives by the constant threat of rape and need to protect themselves against rape if they are not to be coated debt for it. Internalized rape culture means that not only the environment but also the victim himself takes the blame for a sexual assault.
Last edited by mmoc6608731cf5; 2017-04-05 at 04:21 PM.
You don't need a universally accepted definition. The one that matters for US (which is what most posters focus on for one reason or another) is the US definition and maybe the state definitions. Things that don't meet it/them are not rape in that context and as such are meaningless. And unless someone argues in favor of narrowing it down or just not punishing certain behaviors that meet said definition, they aren't normalizing rape.
So what you're saying is that rape culture hijacks the term rape, projects it on things that aren't rape and effectively stretches it into meaninglessness (and then people that question this are proof it exists)? Also, out of curiosity, are the "more subtle forms of rape" mentioned at the end here the same as "less severe forms of sexual misconduct" mentioned at the start of that paragraph and/or "the things that don't actually meet the definition of rape" in the paragraph before?
Conjuring problems out of thin air is even easier. It's also easier to dismiss people disagreeing with your One True Truth as MRA circlejerks (and there's totes legit no hypocrisy here). And constructing your dogma in some circular logic way is the easiest setting there is. Also, what if the people who you say are victims of rape culture were actually victims of rape? I'd say culture on its own generally lacks in victimization capabilities.
Last edited by mmoc6608731cf5; 2017-04-05 at 04:29 PM.
These are typical bullshit statistics that are EASILY disproved... why?
The definition of rape.
Because their definition of rape is stretched to include things like looking at someone the wrong way, or brushing against someone in the corridoor. Or if you have had sex when you are drunk... that is 100% rape in these studies. I kid you not that is how they define rape in these studies.
They need to start a new forum, specifically just for tennisfag to post his inane bullshit. I wonder if you truly believe the crap you post, or if you are objectively the most elaborate troll of all time.
Rape culture is where you can freely assault a woman in the streets. Rape her, and then have her stoned for being such a slut she would allow herself to be raped.
Getting drunk, making poor decisions, succumbing to your lust because you are inebriated is not rape culture. It's your own poor decision making. Twisting someones words with an app is not rape culture.
If the texts had said the girl passed out, and he took advantage of the situation. That is rape. Not rape culture, however. If they planned to roofie the girls drinks, that is rape. They did not force anything. If you drink enough alcohol that you cannot control your actions, that's your fault, while someone who used that situation to their advantage may have pretty poor character, it's not rape unless it was made clear no sex was wanted or intended, but happened anyway.
Pull your head out of your asses, figure out how reality works, take responsibility for your actions. Don't make retarded movements and get authority involved constantly because of your poor life choices. This goes for any party involved.
@Njorun's definition is from Wikipedia. Was Wikipedia edited by the patriarchy or something? Wait, no, I've got this. You dismissing Wikipedia's definition is proof of Wikipedia definition (culture)!
Me thinks Chromie has a whole lot of splaining to do!
No, it doesn't.
This is a bit of a chicken little thing. Most of the time what they have to say is stupid. Everyone knows what constitutes rape: Lack of consent. Drunk sex is not inherently "rape". If no consent was given or consent was denied, it was rape. If consent was given, it was not. Even if they don't remember. Also, again, that which applies to women must also apply to men, lest it be inherently invalid.
To most "feminists", all men fall under that umbrella which is probably why they went with "culture" in the first place. The fact of the matter is that words have meanings for a reason. You can't just throw a couple of words together and say, "Well, it means this, not what it actually means" while others say, "We're going to use it like this and that's what it means". That's not how words work. Njorun's definition is the accurate and actual definition.
Outside of a pervasive, collective belief that believes rape is acceptable, "rape culture" does not exist. The notion that calling other, inherently fallacious definitions invalid, challenging someone's definition of "rape" or questioning the validity of a rape claim is indicative of "rape culture" is circular logic stupidity. (Note: I know you didn't claim this last bit, just throwing it in there for those who did.)
Ah, OK then. I've been stabbed. An act that clearly should be unacceptable. I, a victim, hereby redefine rape culture to including stabbings. I say it's reasonably accepted definition. And trying to exclude this from rape culture is pointless. If you disagree you'll just prove that rape culture exists (and will be a hypocrite for harping on the label). Because words are apparently meaningless.
Let's broaden the definition of rape too while we're at it. I'll say starting with it covering consensual sex as well is reasonable and acceptable as well. And gradually we'll work our way through genocide to celestial bodies and beyond. In few years we'll refer to moon and Sun as "rape". And eventually we'll be like Marklar from South Park, just with rape. Of course if you deny this you will also prove rape culture too. And so will anyone else who thinks that stretching the term rape to the point it's paper thin is moronic.
Exactly!! It is true if you believe drunken sex is rape (with drunken sex being replaceable with any situation that some think is rape and some don't).
That is the entire point. You take a group of people who think X Y Z are rape and they live surrounded by people who say only X is rape, and there is a law saying X and Y are rape. They feel under-represented, their laws don't reflect their beliefs, and they call that a rape culture because Z is seen as rape by them, but others think it is not. They then want to change the laws and/or the perception of other people to be in line with their own point of view.
Now they say drunken sex under a weird set of conditions is rape and you come in and say "there is no rape culture and drunken sex under that set of conditions is not rape", you are doing EXACTLY what they are accusing people of doing, EXACTLY what they are referring to as a rape culture, and therefore, you are making their life easier on this subject.
Again, in this case the law being on your side does not mean there isn't a rape culture, because the law can be what they are trying to change. So it doesn't matter if, from a legal point of view, this this and that. If you go to a country where a man can legally have sex with a woman if she looks him in the eyes, there is a rape culture in that country. If you go to a country where a man can legally have sex with a woman who is mildly drunk and doesn't object and you think that constitutes rape then you think there is a rape culture in that country.
It is all perception and not laws.
It was too inconvenient. Njorun pls, don't harp on the label. Only Raelbo... victims. I mean victims. Only victims are allowed to set the label. By "totally not harping" on labels like yours, that don't fit the dogma of the victims... wait, no, this time it was actually Raelbo... I'm so confused right now... Anyway, by them harping on your label. Goddamnit, I mean not harping. Because of values like consistency, integrity and intellectual honesty
This thread is super gross. Watching all the mental backflips from dudes trying to shout down their own conscience is making my head spin.