Trolls and Goblins have absolutely beautiful females...
Fact (because I say so): TBC > Cata > Legion > ShaLa > MoP > DF > BfA > WoD = WotLK
My pet collection --> http://www.warcraftpets.com/collection/FuxieDK/
A simple change that can improve the female worgen:
http://tinypic.com/r/1zq7p0g/7
No, I picked only Female gender and only level 110 (to exclude bank characters). You can see on picture and try it by yourself here: https://realmpop.com/us.html
Last edited by mmoc09d949bcd0; 2017-04-08 at 06:42 PM.
What is it with peoples' obsession with 'most popular' races, and anything that isn't is comparatively not worth any time despite plenty of people actually playing them?
Also why is that the general argument AGAINST more races?
I, uh, don't think that makes them not a success.
Ah I see what you mean. But we are still comparing female gender only. It doesn't matter if male from the same race is played more or if it's played less than female part. The overall male/female ratio is 60% male 40% female. Ideally it would be 50/50 and all races equally popular.
Last edited by mmoc09d949bcd0; 2017-04-08 at 06:54 PM.
Looking at that realm pop data, you are correct, there are indeed mroe orcs, taurnen, and undead than Draenei... .3-1.2%. Which is significant enough to break the first theory.
Of course, the theory at its base isn't entirely wrong. For instance, the races with the lowest percentages, worgen, dwarves, gnomes, Goblins, and Pandaren (both factions) have women that fall outside modern definitions of beauty, while the ones that do (blood elves, humans, and night elves) have the largest.
Correlation != causation, but there is a pattern worth investigating.
A simple change that can improve the female worgen:
http://tinypic.com/r/1zq7p0g/7
Your OP implies that the overall success of a race is dependent on its female population.
Semantics aside, I agree that there's an obvious correlation between the number of played female characters and whether they're considered attractive.
I'll have you know that all goblins and gnomes are beautiful and deserve more attention.
They're responding to my post, in which I was referring to both male and female.
This thread needs a lot more pictures. I am disappoint.
They always told me I would miss my family... but I never miss from close range.
We have a holy Nathrezim (Lothraxion) and he is f.king amazing btw, so we could have holy sayaad or smt like that too I guess?
I really want to see more holy "demon" races.
I don't think that this poll is fair, because in this expansion we received exclusive hero class that is available for just two races. So it obviously boosted the number of elves.
I wouldn't also say that just because elves are more popular it means that others are ugly. Quite the opposite, new Character model gave a lot of justice to many females, like dwarf, troll, tauren, orc.
But admiteddly they need more customisation options, specially tauren. Trolls also could get some.
They all look great in their own right. And tbh I was never fan of humans (too default), and I don't like characters with glowing eyes.
And well I think my warrior looks stunning ^^ :
http://i.imgur.com/dUZoanz.jpg
Last edited by Ramz; 2017-04-08 at 07:22 PM.
I miss Mists of Pandaria
A simple change that can improve the female worgen:
http://tinypic.com/r/1zq7p0g/7
Why would you look ugly?
Playing a game is distancing yourself from reality(not that im saying you are ugly). Eventually you want everything to be ideal, including appreance.
That is also why belfs are so popular and gnomes are so much less popular.
There is also this rumor going on:
If you have low confidence, you go with something pretty, where if you are avg. or more confident type, you can pull off a gnome or dwarf. All this is not because of appreance, but that you dare to stand out proud(eventually telling the world CBA).
Last edited by mmocd6fe3ee806; 2017-04-08 at 07:25 PM.