Um, the middle class is what creates jobs, not business owners. More educated middle class means wealthier middle class which means they can afford more goods and services which means more businesses are created to cater to the larger consumer base.
If there's no one to buy stuff then there will be no jobs created. It's simple economics.
“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: ‘O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.’ And God granted it.” -- Voltaire
"He who awaits much can expect little" -- Gabriel Garcia Marquez
This again; "creating jobs". You know who creates a job? Everyone does, whenever they buy a gallon of milk, or a set of tires, or hire a maid, etc.
Consumers create jobs. If there's a demand, someone will fill it. if there's no demand for something, Warren Buffett couldn't figure out a way to sell it.
" The guilt of an unnecessary war is terrible." --- President John Adams
" America goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy." --- President John Quincy Adams
" Our Federal Union! It must be preserved!" --- President Andrew Jackson
This is good. Haven't scrolled through this particular thread, but I have no doubt there are plenty of people simply fuming at the idea of anyone else catching a break.
Hopefully they extend something similar to folks who can't swing full time school.There is no age limit for the program; once students receive the Excelsior Scholarship they must be enrolled full-time with an average of at least 30 credits per year
This is wrong. Everyone can make a new business, I'd argue that is something that should be encouraged. Rich folk don't have a monopoly on that and in climate were people are risk adverse rich folk invest on existing large firms. I do agree though rich folk are the one that invest in new ideas.
Last edited by NED funded; 2017-04-12 at 03:22 AM.
this does nothing for the millions of people already $50k+ in debt...
Three things:
1) This just throws more money into the pit that is higher education. Without tuition caps NY will either have to revisit the measure, to reduce the expese of it, or increase revenues to pay for the inevitable inflation in tuition fees which are growing at least twice the rate of inflation.
2) One of the biggest change to the economy after the Great Recession is that a college degree is no longer enough to ensure a middle class lifestyle. ( http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/..._salaries.html ) Between 25-50% of the people gaining a bachelors degree have the same earning potential as some who only have a high school diploma.
If those degree's that actually have a chance to bring students into the higher earning teirs aren't encouraged then, while you will see the bulk of graduates gain a middle class earning potential, there will still be a very large pool of people who will have just wasted four years of the their life getting a degree that has the worth of a six pack of toilet paper, and is just as marketable.
3) This does nothing to resolve disparities in low income and minority attainment pre-college. There needs to be large investments in that level of education services to allow low income and minority students to rise to the challege of the rigourus course work in college.
This effort by NY is a laudable step, however time will tell if, in ten years or so, NY will see any benefit from it, or if there is any signficant increase earning potential of their college graduates, when all is said and done.
The Right isn't universally bad. The Left isn't universally good. The Left isn't universally bad. The Right isn't universally good. Legal doesn't equal moral. Moral doesn't equal legal. Illegal doesn't equal immoral. Immoral doesn't equal illegal.
Have a nice day.
This is what real progress looks like imo.
The income eligibility limit shouldn't have been implemented, and the credit hour requirement is a bit too steep for my tastes, but its a step in the right direction.
Hard capping it at $125k is kind of silly because means-testing a scholarship program at that rate is not going to really save a whole lot of money, plus it opens up the program to the whole "welfare" criticism; universal benefits (like Social Security) are far more popular and thus more politically stable than means-tested ones.
30 credit hours a year is close to the equivalent of a full time job, so low-income students are going to have a much harder time meeting the requirement and covering their living expenses.
The scholarship only applies to schools in the State University (SUNY) / City University (CUNY) systems, which already have tuition increase caps set by the state government.1) This just throws more money into the pit that is higher education. Without tuition caps NY will either have to revisit the measure, to reduce the expese of it, or increase revenues to pay for the inevitable inflation in tuition fees which are growing at least twice the rate of inflation.
Setting graduation goals for specific degrees for the purpose of economic utility is a mug's game, because you don't know what kind of degrees will be economically viable and which ones won't 10 or even 5 years out. Plus your efforts can just lead to over-saturating the labor pool with specific kinds of graduates; from 2008-2013 unemployment in the IT and CompSci fields consistently outpaced general unemployment because of all the degrees handed out during the tech bubble, but tons of people kept going for those degrees everywhere because of Silicon Valley propaganda about an IT worker shortage.2) One of the biggest change to the economy after the Great Recession is that a college degree is no longer enough to ensure a middle class lifestyle. ( http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/..._salaries.html ) Between 25-50% of the people gaining a bachelors degree have the same earning potential as some who only have a high school diploma.
If those degree's that actually have a chance to bring students into the higher earning teirs aren't encouraged then, while you will see the bulk of graduates gain a middle class earning potential, there will still be a very large pool of people who will have just wasted four years of the their life getting a degree that has the worth of a six pack of toilet paper, and is just as marketable.
Hypothetically, if New York State decided to explicitly fund only those degree programs that had current high utility, it would basically put everyone in a nursing program.
Last edited by Slybak; 2017-04-12 at 04:28 AM.
On a related note, Reagan, as governor of California, dismantled the University of California's tuition-free benefit for in-state residents in 1970, which by that time had been in effect for a hundred years.
His argument was that a degree you didn't pay for was going to be less valuable to prospective employers, so he was actually helping students out. He later said that trees cause more pollution than automobiles.