2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
The rules are pretty clearly indicated, and pointing out the practices of a tiny fraction of a religion as what the whole religion does is bashing. It's been bashing and thus against the rules for years now. People keep doing it, despite knowing that they've been infracted for it time and again. It seems their silly pride and not letting go of their idea that every single muslim is a killer, wife beater, etc. is more important to them, so they keep on doing it.
Sometimes moderation can be wrong, which is why there's an appeal process. But people have been getting infractions for the exact same muslim bashing remarks for years. When kids burn their hands on the stove, they learn. So if kids can learn, why can't (supposedly) grown men/women? Is their need to tell the world that every single muslim is a terrorist and wife beater THAT strong?
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I haven't met anyone that is "desperate for Sweden to fail." That is just putting words in their mouth to falsely represent what people are saying.
When Trump pointed out some of Sweden's problems, he just did it as a way to say " we don't want that here," I didn't get any indication from that speech (or the speeches before and after or from his policy) that he "desperately wanted Sweden to fail."
Where are you even getting this from?
- - - Updated - - -
If you were lying on the floor, bleeding- about to die, do you think you would care whether it was a citizen or foreigner that shot you?
If you are, I would imagine that being shot by the outsiders might be worst, because you let them in to do this and could have completely prevented it.
Oh, the well informed columnists of the good, old, not completely bancrupt Grauniad. Judging from how happy they were with Venezuela's situation not too long ago:
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ca-oil-poverty
it's probably only a question of time till Swedes get imprisoned and shot for opposing the government and comb garbage dumps for food.
Last edited by mmocabce60bc47; 2017-04-17 at 06:31 PM.
Nope. Not going to be any imprisonment for opposing the government here. The government would kind of have to go against our constitution to do so and they're a minority government. Fastest way for them to lose power. There's 6 other parties in the parliament.
Last edited by mmoc6608731cf5; 2017-04-17 at 06:32 PM.
People hate to be proven wrong.
The wise wolf who's pride is her wisdom isn't so sharp as drunk.
Most recent murder rates under UNODC put the US at 92nd. To give you an idea of how that stacks up by country, Canada is 89th. Turns out you don't need guns to kill people. Who knew?
Also, the US should take its states into account, because not all of the US has a gun problem. A few of the highest states for gun deaths in this picture also don't have the crime or murder rates of some states (CA has a pretty high murder rate, but a low gun death rate).