Anduin's flaw is obvious. He did not know when being diplomatic does not work. He struggled and learned. He tried to talk sense into someone like Garrosh and got almost killed by it. He had to learn that there are times that a leader must make hard decision. Varian also learned from Anduin that killing shits does not always solve the problems in the dwarven civil war. The story of both Varian and Anduin is about them learning from each other.
I don't know about WoW community but I for one have never said what DKs and DHs have done are morally right or even justified. What corrupted Arthas was his vengence and obsession. There was no reason to pursue Mal'ganis. His priority should have been tending to his people more than anything at that point. When he reached Northrend he burned his own ships and blamed it on the mercenaries and got them killed by his soldiers. He knew it that his cause was not justified and his men would want to leave, so he cut all means for them to leave. Also, Arthas was warned that what the blade would do to one who would wield it. You can not say that Anduin would also be corrupted if he was the one to took up the blade. Anduin would not pursue the same path as Arthas did in the first place.
Last edited by Wildmoon; 2017-04-22 at 09:28 AM.
You honestly compared Thrall to Arthas? I don't even...
- - - Updated - - -
It's that there aren't any, it's that they were never showcased.
For example, Sunwalker Dezco is what in game would be considered a protection paladin. It's about role preferences, not that paladins can't do all the Light magic and martial stuff.
It's more about what the situation demands to me.It's that there aren't any, it's that they were never showcased.
For example, Sunwalker Dezco is what in game would be considered a protection paladin. It's about role preferences, not that paladins can't do all the Light magic and martial stuff.
He knew it was a trap. The dais even said so. But in his hatred of Mal'ganis, he was unable to see the truth behind the words, unlike Muradin did.
- - - Updated - - -
Anduin even tried talking some sense into Garrosh again during the War Crimes novels. and according to the author, it almost worked until TIME TRAVEL! came into the picture.
I'm thinking you really don't like Anduin as a character for your own reason, and that's fine - but I think the charge of "Mary Sue" in this case isn't valid (in addition to it being overused as a way of saying "I don't like this character.") Anduin's flaws are lack of confidence and a reticence to act decisively - he has a tendency to over-analyse that, at times, extends itself to pure navel-gazing. These aren't the flaws of being too nice or too good - they extend from him favoring diplomacy over decisiveness and from a perhaps intrinsic timidity in his nature. The whole point of Anduin's current arc is about overcoming his shortcomings as a leader during wartime, and finding the level between his pacifistic roots and the figure cut by his father as a warrior-king. Anduin isn't perfect, and his flaws are the source of his imperfection and not just a crutch to make him more likable from an external sense, and so he fails the primary metrics of being a Mary Sue in my estimation.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Ok, let's analyze that for a bit.
By the time Arthas grabs the sword he has:
1) Murdered plague victims in Stratholme and set fire to the city to try and cleanse it.
2) In doing so ignored a direct order from his superior Paladin and in doing so pulls rank like a little bitch.
3) Ignores a direct order from his father the king to return to Lordaeron from Northrend.
4) Murdered multiple mercenaries that chose to work for him.
5) In the murdering of those mercenaries engineers a straight lie while stranding his men on another continent.
6) Ignores a warning specifically given that the sword will screw him over even worse than he currently is.
7) In grabbing the sword "kills" his best friend and another mentor in Mauradin Bronzebeard.
That's like ignoring 15 open manhole signs before falling down a storm drain and screaming "why does this always happen to me?!?!"
Arthas was weak but charismatic. His men loved him and would do everything for him but his hubris was such that he thought he could do no wrong. And the reason he thought so was the worst reason of all - because he would be king and as such the job itself would confer infallibility.
Arthas is perfectly culpable and knows exactly what his actions will cost. By the time he reaches for that sword he's stopped listening to the guidance of The Light for ages.
In regards to Demon Hunters, Death Knights, Warlocks and probably Shadow Priests - their actions are not seen as noble. They are all anti-heroes, often doing wrong things for the right reasons.
They are all viewed with distrust by the races and armies of Azeroth. Only trusted by a few higher ups that view them as useful for their power, like a large but ill-trained animal that you can barely trust but have to use. Demon Hunters only consider themselves noble, to their people they are considered power hungry lunatics that at this point may as well be more demon than mortal. Death Knights don't even consider themselves noble, rather they consider themselves useful nihilists that will either throw themselves into any suicide mission that comes along or since they are mistrusted will simply be given said suicide missions as a matter of course.
Then you have Warlocks that live in the shadows, only stepping forth when they think that their control over demonic energies can win them credit and reward. These are probably the most ill-trusted of all the classes because they actively seek out fel energies and use blood magic. Two things that are basically the equivalent of putting a giant "here we are! Come and get us!" to the Legion on the front lawn.
Finally you have Shadow Priests. Discounting the whole Forsaken Cult of the Fallen Shadow or whatever these guys are the ones people should be distrusting, but they don't know they are there. Not really anyway. They dabble in mind-control, enslavement, touching the dark things that are beyond even the Legion. They trust in the corruption that worms into the heart of Azeroth and their grip on control of their dark powers is even weaker than that of a Warlock over the powers of Fel. At any moment a Shadow Priest could fall to darkness and worse of all you'd never know it until it was too late.
Isnt he a priest? Wont Blizz charge him for class change? Has someone already done this joke?
I wouldn't be at all surprised if Anduin became a paladin, but I also wouldn't be surprised if he stayed a priest. Lore characters don't have to (and in fact rarely) follow the rather strict class definitions present in-game.
Them coats are turning quickly on these forums... This is great fun. But I like that Anduin is maturing. Maybe he gets "the Thrall treatment" and hordebois like me start calling him a Pink Pickle or something.
I see what you did there though Paladins for a long time have had hammers as part of their... hm, fantasy for a while. Uther for example holding a mace and possibly the grand daddy to the Paladin mystique which I can't remember exactly is before Thrall having the Doomhammer but still racial leaders don't really follow the class rules like we do so... It could be a new eraaaa!!
I think that Anduin can be both a priest and a paladin, as well as some other characters in the game use several specializations of the class
I certainly hope not. Blizzard has been slowly shitting on priests by making our campaign about needing the paladins, having one of the characters in the campaign literally become a paladin, and so on. Having one of the more well known priest characters become a paladin, just like usual, would be another nail in the coffin.
It wouldn't be another nail in the coffin. It would mean the absolute finality that priests simply aren't a class to be taken seriously or have a meaningful impact in lore.
But there's no would or wouldn't about it, but when. Because when it gets down to it, Anduin being a paladin would be cool to a great amount of people. This is even represented by the sheer amount of simple-minded troglodytes on reddit, the youtube comments of the cinematic, and even here going "YEA IT'S ABOUT TIME ANDUIN BECOMES A PALLY. NO LONGER A PUSSY PRIEST." Even as much as I detest the idea of him being one due to the sheer amount of evidence and rational thought otherwise, I'll admit it would be a little cool if he was.
And as we all well know rule of cool reigns supreme above all else in Blizzard's design philosophy. It's why just yesterday we got a cinematic of Genji riding on top of D.VA's mech and jumping off of it to slash at Diablo.
Last edited by Erbel; 2017-04-26 at 09:12 AM.
It's funny how people who use this argument never hold it against the period in Warcraft history that was saturated with paladins.
Anyway Moira is a major lore character in name only and PotM's are pretty much their own class. Tyrande doesn't even use a single in-game priest ability in WoW or HotS. This expansion is also the first time since Rise of the Horde that Velen has been relevant.
Anduin's a complete wimp and pushover and hardly a worthy paladin. The thought of him being our ruler makes my stomach sick.