She should be allowed to give a speech imo. It seems to me if people just let the old cook go and talk it would get a lot less coverage and no one would care.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/26/us/ann...eech-canceled/
Police say there were security concerns over the conservative commentator's planned event, and even though she won't be on campus, they still are planning for possible violence.
- - - Updated - - -
Glad I am and not biased such as yourself
The right wing talking point is that there were threats of violence.
There were no threats of violence. The school didn't provide them an indoor venue, so the speech was going to be held outside, and the school's police department didn't want protesters and speech attendees clashing.
There were no threats of violence made by people.
Why can't you stop lying?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...Bnation&wpmk=1
The university first announced Wednesday that it was canceling Coulter’s April 27 appearance following several political protests in Berkeley that turned violent. But amid mounting criticism and national attention, the school reversed its decision Thursday, saying that it had found a safe venue to hold the speech on a different date, May 2.
- - - Updated - - -
Fucking dishonest posters, no wonder we can't ever come to agreements.
You know your side is in a bad way when you can somehow make Ann Coulter look like a victim. When you say democrat now all I think of now is masked college kids and professors with bike chains.
This is something that some people fail to get. We are having to defend people we find ideologically unpleasant, because extremists are using/advocating violence to stifle speech.
The bizarre thing is that those supporting violence in political debate, often do not think they are extremists. We have posters on here who think it is perfectly acceptable to punch people with political views they do not like.
Police taking antifa's masks away? They probably won't get violent now.