http://www.dictionary.com/browse/ulster
Ulster
[uhl-ster]
noun
1. a former province in Ireland, now comprising Northern Ireland and a part of the Republic of Ireland.
2. a province in N Republic of Ireland. 3123 sq. mi. (8090 sq. km).
3. Informal. Northern Ireland.
I do not believe you do not know that.
It's a common mistake, Ulster is nine counties, while Northern Ireland is six counties. Monaghan, Cavan, and Donegal being the three counties of Ulster not part of Northern Ireland.
I'll also point out, it really depends on who you talk to in Northern Ireland as to whether or not they refer to the six counties as Ulster. Unionists tend to do so, Nationalists not so much. I don't cause while I support neither Nationalists nor Unionist with any fervor, I recall Ulster being the nine counties.
Last edited by Felnoire; 2017-04-28 at 07:36 PM.
I'd be tempted to move to a Unified Ireland
Ulster is not a name for Northern Ireland, it is the name for the 9 counties that make up the Province of Ulster. Unfortunately six of those counties are still under British rule
It's a mistake in that the Province of Ulster contains Northern Ireland, but is not Northern Ireland in and of itself. Like calling Yorkshire England, while it's in England it's not England in and of itself. I don't get irked by it in any real sense, but I do like pointing out the facts of what Ulster is. Wouldn't be Northern Irish if I didn't take some modicum of pride in giving up some of it's trivia.. still going to call an Ulster Fry an Ulster Fry.
Last edited by Felnoire; 2017-04-28 at 08:00 PM.
Its also the name of an Irish 9 county province that includes the 6 counties that form Northern Ireland.
That it was a Belfast Telegraph pollEvidence it was inaccurate.
[quote]
People paying attention. Between Brexit, Mays contempt and arrogance and the toxicity of austerity Scotlands on its way out. NI is a little greyer but has a good likelihood of leaving within 15 years thanks to the way the DUP is alienating voters.Everyone being?
The prospect of huge economic damage didn't stop the English voting to leave the EU in pursuit of the non existent glories of Empire. It didn't stop them believing the world owes them a living or thinking that the Commonwealth would leap for joy at the prospect of trade deals with the "Home Nation". They are wrong...but that didn't stop them.Good luck to the Scots in maintaining current public spending levels, they will need it.
Why do you think such arguments would work on Scotland? Especially as they have the option of rejoining the EU to mitigate the damage, the likelihood of joining the EFTA and an actual plan on how to handle Independence. All stuff England won't have.
No. But between Brexit and the DUP, reunifications is only a matter of when...not if. The Nationalist and Unionist communities are about equal now and while many from the Nationalist community would vote to remain in the UK, that in turn depends both on the economy and the knowledge that the Nationalist community is being respected. Brexit will damage the economy and the DUP have been acting like bigots recently and alienating the votes they need to defeat any border poll.Is Eire going to try and conquer Ulster?
The Welsh Independence movement is now where the Scottish one was about 50 years ago and May is already treating it with the same contempt she shows Scotland and NI. A government that sees the UK as England with three attached colonies is not one that is going to be very successful at keeping the United in United KingdomThe Welsh say "Hello boyo".
Hah!!! The UK has such a beastie right now. You think that austerity policy is a cenrist policy? Cutting back on public services? Underfunding the NHS to prepare it for privatisation? Their assault on the poor and their right wing politics based on racism and hatred of the other? Ten years ago the polcies the Tories have now were proposed by the BNP.Lucky for us we do not, and are unlikely to have for the foreseeable future, a far right Tory government then.
So yeah....right wing extremists is a good descriptor.
Sure...but they won't be quick, they won't be lucrative, they won't replace the deals the UK has now and the UK lacks the size, power and influence to craft deals that would benefit it instead of the US or China. Look at the deals between the US and Japan or China and Switzerland.The fifth/sixth largest economy in the world will be able to strike trade deals, just so you know.
The UK will...eventually...get trade deals but if yoy're expecting anything good from them, you'll be out of luck. Tbe US already sees Brexit as a chance to asset strip the UK and its desire to force tbe UK to "open up" the NHS is well known.
It does work.
I do not give a shit about what happened one or two centuries ago, otherwise how far do you go back? Should you not get a vote on anything that determines the future of Britain? You are in an area that had a large influx of Anglo-Saxons, so chances are your ancestors did the same if your family has not moved around a lot.
Part of my family came over with the Normans, should anyone with Norman heritage not get a vote? What about those with Roman ancestry? Where is the cut off point?