I wonder what his motives were?
Because, i don't know, cars are not designed with killing someone else in mind?
And for the second thing, the fact that there are so many guns around makes it trivial to ban some people from having guns.
- - - Updated - - -
Gun rights people do not bring it up, because they want to keep their guns.
And again the "tool defence" right, because the tool totally isn't designed for killing.
Removing guns wouldn't solve the problem and likely increase murder as people would have to move from expensive weaponry that requires practice to be accurate with (guns), to cheap weaponry that can induce heavy and lasting damage simply from gravity (knives). If we want the gun problem to go away in the United States, we need to start pushing for people to be less emotional and reactionary and more even-keeled. We also need to start taking mental health far more seriously than we do, both in terms of research, diagnosis and understanding, because too many people who should seek professional help don't and misdiagnoses due to many differing illnesses having overlapping symptoms happens more often than it should.I know but surely removing the whole "right to bear arms" thing would make murders in general less frequent no?
Today I learned that understanding high school physics and the concept that inert objects will never pose harm to a living creature on their own without some kind of outside interaction is having a 'Murica' attitude. Life sure is amazing.Ssssshhh, the gun nuts will hear you! They'll tell you that "guns don't kill people, people kill
people!", and they'll annoy you to death by droning on and on about the 2nd Amendment,
before finally frustrating you with their Murica' attitude.
The Horseshoe Theory claims yet another victim.And finally, as usual, Republicans. They like their expensive toy guns, and fuck you and anyone
else who gets blown away. See the results of the Connecticut Massacre for an accurate example
of how Republicans feel about the choice between protecting you or their guns.
Can you please detail how removing firearms would lower the rate of homicides in the United States, as you are clearly implying that it would?The US's homicide rate is about 4 times that of its peers, NOT including suicides.
Of course it is. The problem is that morons do not understand that:And again the "tool defence" right, because the tool totally isn't designed for killing.
A: Anything can be used for killing
B: A tool designed for efficient killing (i.e. a weapon) cannot do anything on its own.
Go buy a pistol from Walmart and put it on your table and tell me when it loads itself and fires. Go on, I'll wait, I have time.
Its designed for penetrating from a distance. Much like a knife is designed for cutting/penetrating, or a hammer is designed for bashing. Just because you do not see it as a tool (one used for protection, personal enjoyment, and/or a means of obtaining sustenance), does not mean it isnt a tool.
No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.
Holy hell, gun free zones work so well! We need to ban gun free zones.
America gonna America... Nothing will change sadly.