Teacher who seduced 13-year-old student with saucy yoga selfies facing jail time

[Freighter]

Even worse is the fact that the kid viewed her as a mother figure at first, and she gave him gifts. It's rather despicable that people are defending this woman.

Sounds almost like incest.

[Fiddlewick]

Sounds almost like incest.

Yes, rather nasty.
The woman deserves more than 1 year in jail.

[Tommi]

[Deleted]

So

xbox

phone

blowjobs


Yeah really bad situation for a 13y BOY

- - - Updated - - -

I know another kid who was with his teacher at 15 ... now he is gonna be the next president of france ... and her the first lady.

*

How about that MMO shitty therapists?

- - - Updated - - -

Also about all the dumbos writing "HURR DURR BUT HE SAW HER AS A MOTHERLY FIGURE DURR HURR"

At first the teen saw Albini as a “mother figure” when she befriended him in July 2015.

But soon they professed their love for each other and swapped sexually explicit messages.

Fucking learn to read.
He didn't saw really her as a motherly figure if later THEY professed EACH OTHER their LOVE.

His penis was tickling enough to "mhh better tell my parents about this situation? mhh no" so he is not really a victim.
But she ofc desever jail

[Ebalina]

Ahahaha good on him bad on her.

[Ealyssa]

As long as you think the same of a male teacher banging his 13yo female students, I cant exactly criticize you on that part,

Except he is talking about the boy persoective. We aren't in an abusive relation here, at all. That boy wasnt raped, wasnt kept captive and wasn't forced to sexual activites.

Circumstences are important in those cases. He was just fine with the situation. Should she be charged ? Maybe, yes. But facing jail time in this specific situation is stupid.

[Coconut]

I agree, the prevalent double standard in that regard is pretty sickening. A grown woman seducing a young boy is no more acceptable than the other way around; and her being "hot" or not is completely irrelevant as well. There is a reason why we have the age of consent.
It doesn't matter if someone here would have liked it happening to them at that age or not - that does not make it generally okay. And downplaying - or even making fun of - the issue with that reasoning is not okay either. At all.

The double standard in this case is perfectly reasonable, since a girl having sex at that age faces more serious risks than a boy. She can get physically hurt. If she becomes pregnant, she has to deal with that herself, which would be an absolute horror at that age. And even on a psychological level she would be a lot more affected, since in our culture we still have remnants of the idea that sex "devalues" women.

Boys on the other hand can just chalk it up as a growing up experience. That's not saying that there aren't serious risks, especially when the grown woman uses their sexual relationship to emotionally manipulate him, and I probably wouldn't want this woman to remain a teacher, but I can easily see cases where a 13 years old boy would see this as a positive and end up unaffected. It all depends on what kind of relationship they had. It might be worse for him if he ends up blaming himself for destroying her life.

[Mizix]

That sentence seems stupidly short, and why are many of the extra charges being withdrawn?!

Wondering the same... why withdrawn the other charges? O.o

[Raelbo]

I know another kid who was with his teacher at 15 ... now he is gonna be the next president of france ... and her the first lady.

They met when he was 15. When they started having sex is a different matter (some tabloids seem to suggest he was 16, but there doesn't seem to be any proof to back it up). The >3 year age difference is significant. Also bear in mind that in France the legal age of consent is 15.

[Liftbrul]

This is all I came here for.

[PL-Cibo]

I can't comprehend the logic of it. Tinder is a thing. Anyone can get laid - you don't need to bribe a sweaty teenage kid. Why put your career and future on the line?

well maybe shes a pedophile. Not some stupid Internet slang-word but the actual sexual disorder. which in a nutshell means that her preferred sexual partner is a child. read it up. and since when are rational choices part of "love"?

[Raelbo]

The double standard in this case is perfectly reasonable, since a girl having sex at that age faces more serious risks than a boy.

I would agree that the magnitude of the harm tends to be greater for a girl than for a boy. But that does not make it ok to take those liberties with a boy, nor does it mean it should be treated as a lesser offence.

It might be worse for him if he ends up blaming himself for destroying her life.

True. That could really fuck him up big time. Which is part of why what the teacher did was so wrong. She would be entirely responsible for this sort of outcome.

[Forum Action 22]

That poor boy lived the dream. Unlucky teacher though.

[Vorkreist]

Yes he is.

I totally get where you're coming from. For most 13 y/o boys this is a fantasy come true. And having such fantasies is all fine and well, but that is what they should remain - fantasies. This monster of a teacher has probably done huge harm to this kid's future ability to form fufilling relationships in the future.

It's a bit like feeding a child with loads of junk food leading them to become obese. They are happy to partake because they like the food, but ultimately it's very harmful.

The kid is scarred for life by this horrific experience. Bragging for the rest of your life that you banged a milf teacher when you were 13 is something really hard to deal with.

[Berengil]

This monster of a teacher has probably done huge harm to this kid's future ability to form fufilling relationships in the future.

Sentimentalist nonsense. Define "fulfilling relationship". I'll give you my definition (early 40s man here, btw): I get sex whenever I want. That's fulfilling. Everything else is so much window-dressing.

[Deleted]

The double standard in this case is perfectly reasonable, since a girl having sex at that age faces more serious risks than a boy.

Really?.

She can get physically hurt. If she becomes pregnant, she has to deal with that herself, which would be an absolute horror at that age.

Yeah being a dad at 13 is a walk in the part...
What the fuck is wrong with you?

[Fojos]

Interestingly the reaction is very mild, as always, compared to if a 41 year old male teacher had been doing this to a 13 year old girl.

[Raelbo]

Sentimentalist nonsense. Define "fulfilling relationship". I'll give you my definition (early 40s man here, btw): I get sex whenever I want. That's fulfilling. Everything else is so much window-dressing.

What is funny is that you are presenting yourself as the caricature of an irreparably emotionally damaged man. Not sure whether to take it seriously or if you're trying to support my argument...

[Coconut]

I would agree that the magnitude of the harm tends to be greater for a girl than for a boy. But that does not make it ok to take those liberties with a boy, nor does it mean it should be treated as a lesser offence.

True. That could really fuck him up big time. Which is part of why what the teacher did was so wrong. She would be entirely responsible for this sort of outcome.

I think it's a sort of case that should be judged based on the circumstances. She isn't necessarily a predator, this relationship could have been a one time thing, and the boy could have played his part too in making it happen. And while he's still a kid, he's old enough that it might be healthier for him if the whole thing isn't overly dramatized.

I suppose that's a matter of perspective, though. 13 is much closer to the dotted line in the EU, where the age of consent is mostly 14-15 than in the US where it is 16-18 (on both continents it used to be 12 or below until the early-mid 1900's). Hell, in Spain it used to be 13 until 2 years ago.

Really?.

Yeah being a dad at 13 is a walk in the part...
What the fuck is wrong with you?

A grown woman having sex with a 13 years old boy can potentially protect herself, and doesn't have to inform him if she's going to have an abortion (or a child for that matter). I didn't say everything would be ok if she has a child with him and involves him, I said it's worse for girls because pregnancy involves them implicitly.

Also, I'll refer you to what I wrote above. 13 is pretty young, but there are still countries where it is legal, or was legal until very recently. Do I think it's ok? No. It's horribly irresponsible, but then again so would be someone in their early 30s having sex with a 17 years old. Is it sick and worthy of jail? Kind of debatable.

[Berengil]

What is funny is that you are presenting yourself as the caricature of an irreparably emotionally damaged man. Not sure whether to take it seriously or if you're trying to support my argument...

Please do explain the bolded and underlined part. A happy person who enjoys their life (I am and I do) is hardly damaged.

Now, if by "damaged" you mean " doesn't agree with a rom-com's definition of a relationship", I plead guilty.

My man card will follow me to my grave; bet on it.