#FireColbert, Triggered Conservatives upset again!

[callipygoustp]

No, the joke is funny because Trump's mouth is better used for pleasuring the guy he loves than for talking. Your weird ideas about the sub/dom relationship implied is ON YOU.

I have no objection to you taking it that way. Oral sex between two guys isn't overly funny to me, but, to each their own. I know too many gay people, some of which for decades now, to find that kind of normal healthy sexual activity to be weird enough to be considered funny. *shrug*

For me, its all about Trump being Putin's bitch. Even better saying Trump is Putin's cock holster. God dammit that still cracks me up.

[omfgreally]

I miss the Colbert Report

Damn he wouldve torn shreds out of Trump

"HE" don't you mean his army of leftist writers? Also torn shreds, LOL, I doubt that. #overrated

- - - Updated - - -

I have no objection to you taking it that way. Oral sex between two guys isn't overly funny to me, but, to each their own. I know too many gay people, some of which for decades now, to find that kind of normal healthy sexual activity to be weird enough to be considered funny. *shrug*

For me, its all about Trump being Putin's bitch. Even better saying Trump is Putin's cock holster. God dammit that still cracks me up.

Yeah, same can be said about Obama, you know his mouth was used as the Pope's cock holster or ISIS, the UN, the NWO, etc, etc.

[callipygoustp]

It's not the sex that's funny,

You're quoting the wrong person or once again you're implying I said something I did not. Maybe a combo of the two looking over your posting history.

it's that Trump should stfu and go back to doing what he does best with the cute little mouth. Keeping Putin happy. You keep missing this even though it has been reiterated by multiple people multiple times. I'm glad you finally understood basic English after this many pages though.

You choose to see the joke as relating to Trump making Putin happy. The dynamic of "cock holster" is more of a dominant nature over the giver rather than the notion of the giver doing so freely: the cock holster(Trump), doesn't have a choice in the matter <insert Putin making a grunting noise here>. Not the first time you have admitted to missing the point. It won't, I'm sure, be the last.

Cock holster.... LOL still loving it. Colbert is a genius!

And, again, the fact that you find oral sex to imply someone is someone else's bitch is sad for your significant other who might be moronic enough to perform fellatio upon you. Thanks for setting that point in concrete. =)

Never said nor implied. But you like to keep repeating said notion as that will somehow solidify it. Making up things out of thin air: the tool of someone who has absolutely nothing concrete to say. *yawn**yawn**yawn*

I could mention nuance again, but, clearly, its lost on you as you time and time again make clear. You don't get the joke. Why you feel the need to repeat it over and over again is beyond me.

[Mormolyce]

"HE" don't you mean his army of leftist writers? Also torn shreds, LOL, I doubt that. #overrated

Those evil leftists using the power of their intelligence and wit to construct jokes. Clearly that's an unfair advantage.

[callipygoustp]

Yeah, same can be said about Obama, you know his mouth was used as the Pope's cock holster or ISIS, the UN, the NWO, etc, etc.

And folks, if you look over in left field you'll find: omfgreally!

Don't quit your day job. You're not funny. Colbert however, now that guy is fucking funny. Trump, Putin's cock holster. I don't think that's ever going to get old.

[Orbitus]

How do you guys deal with your victim complexes?

Apparently daily. Have you seen how many claim that people get banned on here that think they get banned because they are conservative?

[BrerBear]

Well see I disagree.

Lets say our glorious leader was Palin. The joke wouldn't have been funny either... in fact probably less so. People probably would have wondered... wait is there an infidelity scandal I didn't know about.

If Putin was female, and had a strap on (Trump still the submissive) I think it would have made people more uncomfortable than funny.

I think the 2 being male "makes" the joke.

If this were between a man and a woman, the joke would have been the one we're all already familiar with... "He/she had his tongue so far up his/her ass/pussy that [insert clever punch line]."

It's insulting but not misogyny or anything like that. Same goes for the Trump/Putin joke. You're seeing it as homophobic because you consider it an insult to call them gay. That's on you. Apparently you didn't take the schoolyard lesson you referenced earlier to heart.

[Delekii]

If this were between a man and a woman, the joke would have been the one we're all already familiar with... "He/she had his tongue so far up his/her ass/pussy that [insert clever punch line]."

It's insulting but not misogyny or anything like that. Same goes for the Trump/Putin joke. You're seeing it as homophobic because you consider it an insult to call them gay. That's on you. Apparently you didn't take the schoolyard lesson you referenced earlier to heart.

There's not really much point having the conversation anymore, we're 12 pages in and nobody is going to change their mind. People see what they want to see, even when it is absolutely wrong.

[ati87]

Yeah, same can be said about Obama, you know his mouth was used as the Pope's cock holster or ISIS, the UN, the NWO, etc, etc.

This does not even make any god dam sense and hence why you lot fail on so many levels, what's the context behind those comment anyway or is it a way to get bannend?

but guess trolls will be trolls.

[Cyberowl]

This does not even make any god dam sense and hence why you lot fail on so many levels, what's the context behind those comment anyway or is it a way to get bannend?

but guess trolls will be trolls.

4chan, The Donald, Breitbart, Alex Jones...

pick your poison

[ati87]

4chan, The Donald, Breitbart, Alex Jones...

pick your poison

Hmm since trump uses breitbart as a source I will exclude him

[Breccia]

http://thehill.com/policy/technology...-after-colbert

Why the FCC is unlikely to go after Stephen Colbert

It is highly unlikely that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will fine late-night host Stephen Colbert for an obscene joke he made about President Trump last week, experts say, despite remarks by the agency's chairman about reviewing complaints filed on the broadcast.

Colbert raised eyebrows with a joke during one of his monologues in which he suggested that Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in sexual acts.

“You talk like a sign language gorilla who got hit in the end. In fact, the only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s c--k holster,” the comedian said, with the profanity bleeped out.

The joke prompted criticism from conservatives, and FCC Chairman Ajit Pai was asked about them in multiple media interviews in the days following. He told Fox Business’ Neil Cavuto that he hadn’t seen video of the joke, but that the FCC would look into any complaints it receives, as it does with all objections filed to the agency by television viewers.

On Thurdsay, he told Philadelphia’s Talk Radio 1210 WPHT something similar after he had finally watched the clip.

“I have had a chance to see the clip now and so, as we get complaints, and we’ve gotten a number of them, we are going to take the facts that we find and we are going to apply the law as it’s been set out by the Supreme Court and other courts and we’ll take the appropriate action,” Pai said.

“We have received a number of complaints, as I said, and we’ll follow the standard operating procedures, as we always do, and make sure we evaluate what the facts are and apply the law fairly and fully,” he said later, adding that the most common penalty would be a fine.

Some critics of Trump seized on Pai's comments as a sign that he was preparing to crack down on political speech, even though it is standard for the FCC to look into all the complaints it receives.

“Pai’s remarks are just the latest in a series of statements by the current administration indicating a willful disregard of the First Amendment,” said Howard Rodman and Michael Winship, presidents of the west and east chapters of the Writers Guild of America.

But it’s unlikely that the agency will take action against Colbert. Programming after 10 p.m. is subject to more lenient rules governing what can be aired.

The FCC will likely be examining Colbert’s joke to determine whether it qualifies as “obscene.”

According to the FCC’s website, for material to qualify as obscene, it must “appeal to an average person's prurient interest; depict or describe sexual conduct in a ‘patently offensive’ way; and, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.”

Andrew Jay Schwartzman, a communications and technology law professor at Georgetown who has been critical of Pai, called the joke a “non-story.”

“What Colbert said, even if run unbleeped, probably wouldn't even meet the test for indecency that applies before 10 pm,” Schwartzman wrote in an email. “There is ZERO chance this could meet the obscenity test, which would require extended depiction of actual sex acts.”

The last time the FCC levied a fine for inappropriate material was in 2015, when it hit a Virginia television station for $325,000 for briefly showing an indecent image from a pornographic website.

And in 2012, the Supreme Court threw out earlier fines the FCC had imposed on Fox and ABC for indecent material, but the court did not rule on the agency’s authority to police television content.

Emphasis mine.

[Delekii]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/james-com...214803630.html
Days after a request for increased funding into investigating Russia's involvement in the US election.


Open wide, in comes the aeroplane!

[Deleted]

God, i hate working nights.

Is there a reason you make declarations like this which are obviously false, on their face?
By way of example. By no means the only one I could pull up. There's absolutely nothing about the US court system that requires complainants to be resident in the USA to file a suit. Even over visas.

That wasn't the point of my argument, and you know it.
You can file suits from outside the US, and i never disputed that, i said that the Constitution doesn't apply.

whatever the procedure authorized by Congress is, it is due process as far as an alien denied entry is concerned

If the quote is, congress can make whatever rules they want, that's fundamentally incompatible with 'as the constitution dictates'.

- - - Updated - - -

Actually, according to your posts, nothing is very clear. We're all clear on what Colbert was doing, and you really haven't had a good answer to the main point, which is: unless you think being gay is bad think, Colbert wasn't being homophobic.

No, see the point of the Tirade was to insult, therefore, Colbert meant to disparage, therefore there was derogatory intent.
What part of that is hard to understand?
The premise of the joke is that its 'bad' (disparaging) to suck a man's cock.
It's not very complicated.

- - - Updated - - -

No, it doesnt. As has already been said twice now, the comment doesnt have its context change if either party changes to a woman. Subservience isn't specific to homosexuality. Trump could be a woman and still be subservient to Putin, or Putin could be a woman and Trump could still be subservient to her.

So you are subservient if you suck cock?
That then leads invariably to the homophobia.

[Hammerfest]

Mark Dice weighs in on a recent anti-Trump joke Colbert attempted to make that got derailed by his own audience... for which Colbert and his guest scolded the audience for...

[xuros]

The cock holster, er mouth of the left! Stay classy!

[KrazyK923]

Mark Dice is a joke.

[Delekii]

No, see the point of the Tirade was to insult, therefore, Colbert meant to disparage, therefore there was derogatory intent.
What part of that is hard to understand?
The premise of the joke is that its 'bad' (disparaging) to suck a man's cock.
It's not very complicated.

Again; no. The premise of the joke is that it is generally the case that the one giving oral pleasure is often subservient to the one receiving it - gender doesn't matter. A man giving a woman oral gratification could be equally said to be subservient to her. Stop projecting your own shit. Whether or not oral sex actually implies subservience is neither here nor there, the joke is based on the stereotypical joke trope that says it is.

So you are subservient if you suck cock?
That then leads invariably to the homophobia.

I realise that you are probably not as dense are you are acting and in fact realise that what you are saying is outright stupid, but in the aim of good faith argument:

Subservience is not specific to homosexual relationships, nor specifically to sucking dick rather than eating vagina. Nor is subservience necessarily a bad thing; except when it is the president of the united states being subservient to the president(?) of russia.

So, your multiple failings are:
1. Gender is not important to the joke in any fashion, and all iterations of gender for all parties in the joke work equally well.
2. Even if gender were important to the joke (which it isn't, as per [1]), it wouldn't be homophobic because it is only pertinent due to the relative position of the parties in the joke.
3. Subservience is not generically negative, but only negative because of the relative positions held by the parties in the joke. Trump can be subservient to whomever he likes, as can anyone else, but not when it involves decision-making when running a country.

So, to sum up: Stop applying your personal hangups and inferences to the joke and apply its own contexts instead.

[Orbitus]

Mark Dice weighs in on a recent anti-Trump joke Colbert attempted to make that got derailed by his own audience... for which Colbert and his guest scolded the audience for...

Again, who the fuck cares about that douche Mark Dice? You keep linking him, like he is fucking relevant.

[Breccia]

"Mr. Trump, there's a lot you don't understand, but I never thought one of those things would be show business. Don't you know I've been trying for a year to get you to say my name? And you were very restrained -- admirably restrained -- but now you did it. I won."

-- Stephen Colbert, Winner.