"The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it's indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference."
Elie Wiesel (1928 – 2016)
Why? The article claimed Rotherham as an example of underage sex. Rotherham in this context in the UK is synonymous with the Muslim grooming gangs having sex with underage children. This was clearly an intentional (if not misleading) example in the original article to get attention and so it's not hard to make the connection.
I wasn't being racist or anti-muslim. It's not my fault that all the men in those gangs that were involved in the rape of 1'400 girls in that case all happened to be Muslim. It's just a big coincidence.
Last edited by rogueMatthias; 2017-05-09 at 04:53 PM.
BASIC CAMPFIRE for WARCHIEF UK Prime Minister!
I would think the opposite would be just as problematic, assuming they've had no partners because they're a pure little 15 year old who has obviously never had any sexual attractions to people around them.
Teaching abstinence only doesn't work. We know this clear as crystal.
Do you call your parents every time you have sex? "Oh yeah mom, it was in the car after the movie. It was great."
The article seems to be nothing but religious drivel. Teenage sex has always been a part of growing up and it likely always will be as it's perfectly natural.
Probably because it only is in a legal context. The term "child" is defined as a "prepubescent human". Outside of relative references (as a substitute for "offspring"), people who use it colloquially to describe a teenager are typically just being hyperbolic.
Two points: First, using "slut" to describe promiscuous females is ignorant. Second, age of consent laws exist to protect children and teenagers from adults, not each other.
as an American I see nothing news worthy in that article. hell even in jesus fuck mid western america kids 15-16 having sex is nothing new or shocking.
Made zero sense to me.
Now that underage sex is considered normal, they avoid talking about it because it sounds judgemental?
And when it was not considered normal, they could talk about it freely?
How does that make sense?
No shit.. I personally don't see the problem in two underage people having sex.. Obviously a 13 year old having sex with a 20+ is fucking disgusting but if the age difference is only 2-3 years I really don't understand the issue.
I heard some children drink before 18 too, shocking!
Teens having or wanting to have sex? I'd never thought of such!
Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.
"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988
Having sex before the the age of consent has always been common in the UK, as it likely is in most if not all countries. 15 seems to be the common age to start which mentally speaking is little different than 16, not exactly shocking.
Denying contraception is absolutely fucking moronic though, may stop one in every few hundred cases. I started at 15 and didn't use condoms the first few times because I was a stupid horny young person, my school didn't provide any and clinics etc didn't promote the fact that they had them avaliable for free, we've come a long way since then and the current environment is far more healthy and safe.
That said quite a few of the girlfriends I've had became sexually active at 14 and their partners were 20/21 year old guys much like the article.. always seemed pretty odd to me but at least those guys were mature enough to always use condoms etc.
Her hall is called Eljudnir,
her dish is Hunger,
her knife is Famine,
her slave is Lazy,
and Slothful is her woman servant.
Jokes aside, it was a surprise for me personally to find out that close to half of my female classmates already had sex before they turned 16 when I was studying in East Sussex. Admitadly, it seemed like this number was lower for males (everyone likes to boast, so difficult to say exactly), but some cases were buffling in retrospect. A friend of mine (he was 15 at the time) dated a 27 year old woman for example.
I mean, my country definitely isn't known for conservative views towards sex, but in England, if you have not been laid by the time you are 17, you are definitely off the trend.
My theory is that this is because of a more conservative behaviour in England's culture in general. Teenagers tend to "rage" and go against the trend (forbidden fruit and all that) of the society in general. I do not think that this is due to sex education classes. So limiting them seems pointless.
Last edited by Gaaz; 2017-05-09 at 05:24 PM.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
If you consider all the cases of abuse and cover-up at care homes around the UK, the Plymouth ring as well as things like Jimmy Saville and other BBC celebs (plus the conspiracy around the Westminster dossier) then there is a worrying trend of reports or suspicions of child abuse not being acted on, but those cases might not be "multicultural" enough for you to care about.
- - - Updated - - -
They're trying to say that kids having sex with kids makes it impossible for authorities to act when adults have sex with kids, then they throw in some examples that only include abuse by Asian or British-Asian men despite there being some very high profile cases involving white-British men and women. I'm not entirely sure but I think they have some sort of agenda.