why the fuck you wouldn't let your own media into your own white house. and russians got inside? sweet jesus on a crutch.
Actually that's easy.
Russian media is predominantly state-run. American is not.
Russia tells their media what they can, and can't, print. Trump cannot.
Russia is interested in "negotiation" in the sense that they want more control of Syria, more control of Arctic oil, a better trade situation with Iran and easement of sanctions for flat-out conquering part of Ukraine with soldiers out of uniform. The US, for the most part, is not willing to "negotiate" in this sense.
Russia is interested in telling, nay, proving to its people that Trump is Russia's cock holster. Trump seems less than thrilled with the topic.
Oh, and there's Tillerson and Exxon, too. They're not ready to make that public yet.
It was the "news media" which was barred, so to be accurate, there was American media there: The White House Official Press Corp guy. You know, the guy who's very lively-hood and job depend on towing the shiny orange line. Kind of bizarre that the White House released literally NOTHING from that meeting, while the Russians were tweeting photographs from it minutes after it started. But yeah, totally nothing to see there.
And before somebody points it out: The Russian Guy was their "diplomatic" equivalent to the WH press corp guy. The difference is that while the WH guy is basically just a glorified photographer, the Russian Guy is basically the equivalent of a full on reporter, since the Russian Media is state run.
Can't be under FBI investigation if there is no FBI director
Whole thing smells of left hysteria. Did Comey overstep his boundaries? Multiple times, always to serve left. He broke protocols, made press conferences about things that aren't even his business, tried to do US attorney's job. He was as corrupt as politicians can get.
He is supposed to be unbiased.
So good riddance. Now left are crying because one of theirs got sacked for not doing his job properly.
Did you even read that article? It was just one photographer, not media.
Clickbait title. There were no reporters at all. Just one photographer to make photos.
Last edited by mmocbeba583bd0; 2017-05-11 at 07:10 AM.
Did I mention reporters? And since when are Photographers not media? Way to totally miss the fact that that Russian Photographer is part of their State Run media, so pretty much every photo he took ended up directly in some PR Spin Rag directly under Putin's thumb.
If the regular media photographers from other news organizations were denied access to the meeting, why allow the Russian Guy, being that he is functionally exactly the same?
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe you should take your own advice, as you pretty clearly didn't read the article at all. And if you did, then I pity your reading comprehension and critical thinking skills if your takeaway was "this is all good".But the Russians, who have a largely state-run media, brought their own press contingent in the form of an official photographer. They quickly filled the vacuum with their own pictures of the meeting with Mr. Trump, Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, and Sergey I. Kislyak, Moscow’s ambassador to the United States.
Within minutes of the meeting, the Foreign Ministry had posted photographs on Twitter of Mr. Trump and Mr. Lavrov smiling and shaking hands. The Russian embassy posted images of the president grinning and gripping hands with the ambassador. Tass, Russia’s official news agency, released more photographs of the three men laughing together in the Oval Office.
The White House released nothing.
Last edited by Surfd; 2017-05-11 at 07:24 AM.
Except for the tweeting by Russian sources the entire time keeping a constant commentary.
"But Breccia! That was the official Kremlin twitter account, not the Russian press!"
*ahem*
State-run media.
Did you look at those tweets? Just photos stating that meeting has started and they shook hands. Basic photo op, nothing was actually reported.
But I do see problem with it. White House photographer should have been doing photo op, not Russian photographer. However whole issue is overblown and exaggerated massively. Its just a photo op, nothing else.
edit: appears there was a White House photographer there too. So there is absolutely nothing wrong with that meeting.
Last edited by mmocbeba583bd0; 2017-05-11 at 08:53 AM.
There was one Russian and one White House photographer. That's it. No other "media" was there.
Here you can see their entire "scoop":
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mfarussia/
- - - Updated - - -
That's not "Kremlin" account, it is Ministry of Foreign Affairs account. Same ministry Lavrov leads... you know, the guy on photos? That's his photographer doing them.
Last edited by Shalcker; 2017-05-11 at 08:19 AM.
Wait, so there was a White House photographer?
That makes whole thing the perfect example of fake news.
@Breccia
Last edited by mmocbeba583bd0; 2017-05-11 at 08:54 AM.
Well we swear loyalty to the Constitution, at least if you get a government job.
Comey was Trump's employee who signed a contract that said Comey could be fired by Trump for any reason.
Comey basically got Trump elected by reopening an investigation into Hillary's email problem 3 days before the election, no doubt giving voters some doubts about Hillary. I don't have any sympathy for Comey.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
He also immensely overstepped into the political arena when he "cleared" Clinton of the previous investigation, essentially saying "what she did was wrong, but it wasn't illegal so there's nothing to charge her with," a negative sentiment that he was later forced to recant by being put before a Senate investigation committee under oath.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland