Challenge Mode : Play WoW like my disability has me play:
You will need two people, Brian MUST use the mouse for movement/looking and John MUST use the keyboard for casting, attacking, healing etc.
Briand and John share the same goal, same intentions - but they can't talk to each other, however they can react to each other's in game activities.
Now see how far Brian and John get in WoW.
Old 54 trait shows that no, players can't handle an AP system that is possible to cap. With Concordance, every player will eventually find the point where they feel like getting another +200 on the proc isn't worth whatever amount of WQs or m+ worth of AP to get. The moment Concordance can be capped you'd see Mythic raiders going apeshit all over again.
But for now I'm just going to 'enjoy' the usual shortsightedness of players, complaining that AK40 instead of 50 is making them less likely to play alts when we haven't even hit 38 yet. These guys can't spend a lot of time thinking how narrowminded such complaints are. Reminds me of MoP beta where Blizzard increased exp to level and people whined about that too, instead of realizing that leveling past a zone when you've done a quarter of the quests isn't good either.
Nah, now people felt entitled to AK50 because it got past PTR.
Last edited by MasterHamster; 2017-05-23 at 02:08 AM.
Active WoW player Jan 2006 - Aug 2020
Occasional WoW Classic Andy since.
Nothing lasts forever, as they say.
But at least I can casually play Classic and remember when MMORPGs were good.
I mean, I don't really see why a stopping point was needed in the first place. I thought stopping at 50 vs just letting it scale infinitely until the end of the expansion was a mistake too. It feels good to get AK every 5 days, and it feels good to get a new trait about every 5 days. Concordance is already weak enough that there isn't a massive player power gain to be obtained by getting significantly ahead. However, wasn't the entire point of most of the Legion system changes to make content last longer, and to make repeatable content - whether it's world quests, 5 mans, farming raids, etc. feel rewarding, so people feel that they always have stuff to do?
Cutting AK gains off make traits past about 62-65 not reasonably obtainable, and essentially remove the value of AP as a reward. I don't see why that's a good thing given how much the Legion reward structure is built around the value of AP. Why would they want to give people less reason to do content? They already solved the problem in EN/ToV where there was too much of a player power reward from extreme AP grinding. This is just a pointless change that actively breaks their own reward structure, and I really don't see what they were thinking.
Because they'd lose their carrot on the stick. Can't have an end to the grind in Legion - gotta keep you loggin in.
OT: 50 or 40...doesn't make a difference to me. It just means every x days I wont have an additional Order Resource sink and will end up banking it because I already can't go through them fast enough. A little annoyed that they made such a pointless change though.
The reason they don't is because the bold part is a lie. It's not much point over point, but neither was the meta one the first time around(.5% iirc). But once you get 10 points out? 20? People, even those not in WF guilds, will chase it. And how to do end up balancing the Argus raid around whatever Concordance people have in a couple months? So you either choose to have a stopping point, which is laughable, or you devalue the reward into nothingness - which is what they've chose to do.
Last edited by cfStatic; 2017-05-23 at 02:36 AM.
With how trait costs and AK scaling works, there is literally no possible way you would get 20 or even 10 points ahead of another player. Even if player A is farming AP all day, and player B does nothing but their weekly M+, emissary caches and show up for raid, player B is still going to be within ~3 traits of player A. The scaling of costs, and the diminishing returns of repeatable content (M+ has pretty terrible AP gains per hour spent) make it impossible. The system was already fine.
Plus, it isn't comparable to the old paragon trait.
(1) Trait costs for the old paragon trait were only going up by about 10% per trait. They were flat enough that people could just hardcore grind and get way ahead. You can't do that with the Concordance (as explained above) because the trait costs are exponential.
(2) 0.5% player power per trait was not an insignificant amount. 1 point of Concordance is only worth 40-50 primary stat. We will probably be at ~70,000 primary stat in ToS gear, so you are looking at ~+0.06% gain to your primary, which is some level less than that in terms of gain to total DPS/HPS. Added Concordance traits are something like 1/20 as powerful as the 0.5% throughput traits were. If someone could only get a max of ~3 traits ahead (which I think is likely), the most they would be is like 0.1%-0.2% player power ahead of a player playing much less. This variance is too trivial to fucking matter.
Well this will make the ap grind for 868 trillion a lot more grandeur /s
Just buy the books every 5 levels for 1000 resources and mail to your alt.
- - - Updated - - -
Because 10 level * 5 days is 50 more days of people feeling like they need to keep grinding as the AK increases balance out the requirement for the next point. I swear I read AK boosted it by 30% and each new point is 30% more AP.
They want the remaining points to come naturally and not be something you should be grinding for.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Essentia@Cho'gall of Inebriated Raiding.
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/characte...ssentia/simple
http://masteroverwatch.com/profile/pc/us/Tharkkun-1222
10 levels is the same as getting another Concordance, its not small. 50 levels is 10k stat, have you ever played diablo 3 ? Getting Paragon levels is a pain in the abck but ppl that doe get a shitom of it are godlike. Trying to make ppl not grind AP by making the grind a chore is not a smart solution at all.
Concordance is literally useless beyond the first point.
800-1200 DPS per rank on Patchwerk. And each rank takes a full week to obtain roughly until we hit AK40 cap. Then it will start to take exponentially longer up-to a point where your standard AP farming(doing WQs+old/new raids) routine will give you 1 rank per month.
Finally good news, im tired to see blizzard catering to casuals... You must earn the right to have those procs
Bbbut muh completely fabricated claims that I need this to keep up with the rest of my raiders in my world ranked 75000 guild!1
If you honest to god think that is some meaningful gain worth spending 18 hours a day pointlessly grinding for a month please seek mental help. I'm 100% serious.
You are exaggerating to a ridiculous degree.
52 traits costs 2.2 billion total AP
55 traits costs 4.9 billion total AP
62 traits costs 31.1 billion AP
For someone to even get 3 traits ahead, they would have to do well over double the AP farming. To get 10 traits ahead, you'd have to earn ~15 times the AP. Unless you literally do nothing in game, you are not going to fall more than 3-4 traits behind even the hardcore. The top AP gainers in the world are only at 57 traits right now, while people playing very casually are hitting 52-53. It's a total non issue. 3-4 traits is probably like 0.2% more DPS. That hardly makes people "godlike". That small of a difference can be made up by having better crit RNG on a pull to pull basis or by having better RNG on getting Titanforged gear, etc. Any one that is saying they are losing on DPS meters to someone because they are 3-4 Concordance traits behind is just trying to make excuses really.
" Hotfixes
Classes
Warrior
When leaving Skyhold, Warriors are now protected by Val’kyr who insist that the player land safely and not disconnect. "
This is why I love Blizzard I'm glad they finally fixed it.
About the post: I actually don't think raising the AK to 50 was that mandatory... that's why this hotfix doesn't bug me at all. 40AK is OK to me and to everyone else. It's enough.
Edit: Dumb me, the hotfix I talked about here is actually from May 15th (don't mind that).
Last edited by mmocefc9cb3cf7; 2017-05-23 at 03:44 AM.